• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
end of this series spoiler (merged)
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
geraniums
13-05-2007
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/s...name_page.html



Spoiler
I think it may be a reference to Tre. He`s a family man.
jazz_joe
13-05-2007
OMG!!!!!!!

Spoiler
It might not be Tre...but arent there a final four (with a live final) so he has 3 more to pick from?
jazz_joe
13-05-2007
because it only says there are a final two there.......
geraniums
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by jazz_joe:
“OMG!!!!!!!

Spoiler
It might not be Tre...but arent there a final four (with a live final) so he has 3 more to pick from?
”

Spoiler
Am trying to think who would quit to spend more time with their family............could be Lohit?

I can`t believe they`d put themselves through that hell and then quit at the final hurdle. Incredible!
jazz_joe
13-05-2007
The only ones who have family who are still remaining are Jadine (one daughter), Kristina (one son) and Tre (one son)

Spoiler
I would lieterally scream at the TV if one of the two women quit as those two women have been my faves this whole time. What i want to konw is that, how can SA get down to his last 2.......that hasnt happened yet. According to other sources, SA has revealed he is having 4 in his final!
geraniums
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by jazz_joe:
“because it only says there are a final two there.......”

Spoiler
But he has to decide which two to go into the final after they all go through the rigorous interviews from SAS`s advisors. So he could have offered a job to this person, been turned down and then had to offer it to his third choice. Probably the person who turned it down was sworn to silence.

Come to think of it - it might be Katie. He asks if they are there to raise their profile, or genuinely want to work with him.

Grrrrrrrrrr! I want to now RIGHT NOW!!!!

And someone doesn`t have to have a child to quit - they could be quiting to look after their parents, for example.


I see DS have the story now. Don`t click, if you don`t want to know!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/realityt...ice-final.html
jazz_joe
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“
Spoiler
But he has to decide which two to go into the final after they all go through the rigorous interviews from SAS`s advisors. So he could have offered a job to this person, been turned down and then had to offer it to his third choice. Probably the person who turned it down was sworn to silence.

Come to think of it - it might be Katie. He asks if they are there to raise their profile, or genuinely want to work with him.

Grrrrrrrrrr! I want to now RIGHT NOW!!!!

And someone doesn`t have to have a child to quit - they could be quiting to look after their parents, for example.


I see DS have the story now. Don`t click, if you don`t want to know!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/realityt...ice-final.html”

true but it says there is a LIVE FINAL on the 13th of june with 4 people in other papers!
*Laura*
13-05-2007
Spoiler
This really does call the vetting of contestants into question. I don't really believe the "looking after the family" as a reason for not accepting the job. After all these are supposed to be high flyers who want to learn from one of the country's most successful businessmen. By offering this as a reason for not accepting the positions offered to them they have reduced the show to a BB type series. This really is a slap in the face for people like Adam who genuinely joined the show to learn.

NB: Someone did post this news earlier in the week (and was slated for it) saying it was Kristina and then re-posted saying he got the name wrong. Therefore I'm guessing it's Katie. If it is Katie then the people like Nick and Margaret are also at fault for not spotting this earlier.

Last edited by *Laura* : 13-05-2007 at 11:48
adamcm
13-05-2007
just because some contestants don't have children doesn't mean they don't have families.
bigbrother
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by *Laura*:
“
Spoiler
This really does call the vetting of contestants into question. I don't really believe the "looking after the family" as a reason for not accepting the job. After all these are supposed to be high flyers who want to learn from one of the country's most successful businessmen. By offering this as a reason for not accepting the positions offered to them they have reduced the show to a BB type series. This really is a slap in the face for people like Adam who genuinely joined the show to learn.

NB: Someone did post this news earlier in the week (and was slated for it) saying it was Kristina and then re-posted saying he got the name wrong. Therefore I'm guessing it's Katie. If it is Katie then the people like Nick and Margaret are also at fault for not spotting this earlier.
”

I really wouldn't place the blame on Nick and Margaret, even SAS knew that
Spoiler
Katie
was possibly not quite "in it to win it"???
*Laura*
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by bigbrother:
“I really wouldn't place the blame on Nick and Margaret, even SAS knew that
Spoiler
Katie
was possibly not quite "in it to win it"???”

Spoiler
I'm not placing the blame solely on N&M but, they see a lot more than we do and must have picked up on it. I also agree that SAS must also accept responsibility for not firing these people once they're in the BR but, he is probably acting on the advice of those who are with the candidates. However, on the whole it's the vetting procedure which is at fault, for not sifting out the "wannabee BB candidates" as opposed to those who genuinely want to learn about Big Business.

With Michelle unable to finish her contract, and now this, the show is beginning to lose credibility. As far as I know this hasn't happened in the US version, and maybe our producers should look at how they manage to choose winners who last the course.
geraniums
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by bigbrother:
“I really wouldn't place the blame on Nick and Margaret, even SAS knew that
Spoiler
Katie
was possibly not quite "in it to win it"???”

Spoiler
You could be right. He did have doubts about her prior to this. But I wonder if it is her, then what she hoped to gain? She`s not coming across as a very good person and is quite a back-stabber. Who the heck would want to employ her after watching her on the show?!
ah83
13-05-2007
Katie has two children, at least.
moogester
13-05-2007
Spoiler
The BBC website says Katie is a single mother of two. If it is Katie that turns SAS down the editing she is getting makes sense.
hannahb39
13-05-2007
Spoiler
It sounds a lot like Katie to me from the descriptions. I'll be quite annoyed if she gets that far and that is who SAS wants Whatever happens its gonna be very interesting!
geraniums
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by moogester:
“
Spoiler
The BBC website says Katie is a single mother of two. If it is Katie that turns SAS down the editing she is getting makes sense.
”


Spoiler
Her editing isn`t sympathetic, that`s for sure. But then they didn`t put the words into her mouth that she spouted. The things she said about some of her fellow contestants were really quite vicious.
Balti
13-05-2007
I reckon it's:
Spoiler
Kristina

This person seems most likely to appeal to sral. Although I agree that family is a fairly lame excuse for ducking out as all of them must already have compromised on family time at some point to have achieved in their careers.
tamasooz
13-05-2007
Spoiler
Oks, if it is Katie, maybe she did it cos she's realised how badly she's come across on the TV and doesn't want the job cos she knows none of the public will support her. I also would not be one bit surprised if it was her cos she's completely ruthless at heart.
jonnythemoose
13-05-2007
Spoiler
I can't really see Katie being SAS's favourite above others at that point, but if she's a single mother, then maybe it's possible.

I also think it's the kind of thing that Katie would do.

God I hope it's not Kristina...but then again if it's Katie, that means she doesn't get fired! And we don't get to see her face when she's fired!

Grr...I wish I hadn't read that story, but I couldn't resist!
Sidespin Nid
13-05-2007
Why are people posting in spoilers in a thread which has the words "major spoiler" in capaitals in it's title , surely people who want to know what happens will look at the spoliere anyway and those who don't want to look won't open the thread
oulandy
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/s...name_page.html



Spoiler
I think it may be a reference to Tre. He`s a family man.
”

It's interesting that it says two work for him for three months - elsewhere I have read that it is six months. I wonder which it is.
geraniums
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by oulandy:
“It's interesting that it says two work for him for three months - elsewhere I have read that it is six months. I wonder which it is.”

I always believed it was six months as well.

Originally Posted by Ansildrall:
“Why are people posting in spoilers in a thread which has the words "major spoiler" in capaitals in it's title , surely people who want to know what happens will look at the spoliere anyway and those who don't want to look won't open the thread”




People post in spoilers in a spoilers thread because - believe it or not - some people who don`t want to know spoilers click on the thread and then complain the information isn`t in spoilers. Daft, I know. But take it up with them!!
oulandy
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“I always believed it was six months as well.






People post in spoilers in a spoilers thread because - [b]believe it or not - some people who don`t want to know spoilers click on the thread and then complain the information isn`t in spoilers.[/ Daft, I know. But take it up with them!!”

How very true!
Alrightmate
13-05-2007
Originally Posted by *Laura*:
“
Spoiler
This really does call the vetting of contestants into question. I don't really believe the "looking after the family" as a reason for not accepting the job. After all these are supposed to be high flyers who want to learn from one of the country's most successful businessmen. By offering this as a reason for not accepting the positions offered to them they have reduced the show to a BB type series. This really is a slap in the face for people like Adam who genuinely joined the show to learn.

NB: Someone did post this news earlier in the week (and was slated for it) saying it was Kristina and then re-posted saying he got the name wrong. Therefore I'm guessing it's Katie. If it is Katie then the people like Nick and Margaret are also at fault for not spotting this earlier.
”

Laura, I agree with you. If anybody reads your spoiler text then you can see why.....
Spoiler
....somebody may get the name wrong when both names begin with the letter 'K'. It would be quite a natural mistake to make.
Woodbeam
13-05-2007
Spoiler
I can well understand why someone might get to the end of the series and change their mind without N and M seeing signs. Some people like the chase more than the victory.

I can also see Katie, Tre or Katrina having the strength of mind to decide they don't want the job and taking some delight in saying so. Its the perfect way to get attention. In fact, who would want a job at Amstrad and a fairly average salary for a high flyer after all that media exposure
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map