I don't care who it is as long as it isn't Katie. She is vile personified and does not deserve to be in the final two.
end of this series spoiler (merged)
2 of 3
Originally Posted by jazz_joe:
“The only ones who have family who are still remaining are Jadine (one daughter), Kristina (one son) and Tre (one son)
”
“The only ones who have family who are still remaining are Jadine (one daughter), Kristina (one son) and Tre (one son)
Spoiler
Spoiler
In previous series I'm sure the finale is filmed with ALL possible outcomes. i.e Ruth Badger filmed a scene of her losing (which was shown) and also a scene of her winning and Michelle losing (and nothing is announced until it's air date....so the finalists don't even know who has won until the final day- even though it's pre-recorded.......probably to avoid spoilers like this) -
Given that is the technique they use, I can't see how this spoiler can have any credability.
Given that is the technique they use, I can't see how this spoiler can have any credability.
Originally Posted by Pres.F:
“In previous series I'm sure the finale is filmed with ALL possible outcomes. i.e Ruth Badger filmed a scene of her losing (which was shown) and also a scene of her winning and Michelle losing (and nothing is announced until it's air date....so the finalists don't even know who has won until the final day- even though it's pre-recorded.......probably to avoid spoilers like this) -
Given that is the technique they use, I can't see how this spoiler can have any credability.”
“In previous series I'm sure the finale is filmed with ALL possible outcomes. i.e Ruth Badger filmed a scene of her losing (which was shown) and also a scene of her winning and Michelle losing (and nothing is announced until it's air date....so the finalists don't even know who has won until the final day- even though it's pre-recorded.......probably to avoid spoilers like this) -
Given that is the technique they use, I can't see how this spoiler can have any credability.”
That`s not true. SAS took the Badger and Michelle to lunch and told them both his decision before the final show was screened and the winner announced. He said at the time that it was the right thing to do.
Spoiler
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“That`s not true. SAS took the Badger and Michelle to lunch and told them both his decision before the final show was screened and the winner announced. He said at the time that it was the right thing to do.”
“That`s not true. SAS took the Badger and Michelle to lunch and told them both his decision before the final show was screened and the winner announced. He said at the time that it was the right thing to do.”
Wasn't that on the final day?
After Tim's and Michelle's experiences with Sugar, I would have thought it would have been crystal clear that one of the main priorities of working at one of his corporations is that family comes a distant second to work.
The selection process is rigorous and one thing to be remembered as we watch heavily edited segments which go to produce what is primarily an entertainment programme is that all 16 finalists have shown some exceptional qualities off screen to make it to the televised stages.
The selection process is rigorous and one thing to be remembered as we watch heavily edited segments which go to produce what is primarily an entertainment programme is that all 16 finalists have shown some exceptional qualities off screen to make it to the televised stages.
I'm sure someone mentioned on another thread that
was now working for their organisation which would indicate they were out of the running for the final. Though as one of the other posters has said, if they are the one at the heart of this story it means we're robbed of seeing their face when fired
Spoiler
so the person that started this other thread
sold his story as he had said...he also said he was mistaken about the person in question being
Spoiler
Last edited by Cavegirl : 14-05-2007 at 12:32
Originally Posted by Cavegirl:
“so the person that started this other thread
sold his story as he had said...he also said he was mistaken about the person in question being
”
“so the person that started this other thread
sold his story as he had said...he also said he was mistaken about the person in question being
Spoiler
Spoiler
I'm with you Pres.F. I can quite see the person you mention being among sral's favourites. Furthermore
Also, in today's Mirror, Tony Parsons says that the "bombshell" will be dropped on "this week's edition of The Apprentice". That can't be right can it? Is it this week?
Spoiler
Also, in today's Mirror, Tony Parsons says that the "bombshell" will be dropped on "this week's edition of The Apprentice". That can't be right can it? Is it this week?
Come on it's obvious Kristina and Tre were the final 2 and single mum Kristina bowed out and Tre won!I preferred Kristina.:sleep:
Originally Posted by Zongo:
“unspoiler tagged post”
“unspoiler tagged post”
there's just no need...why didn't you use spoiler tags?
Originally Posted by Zongo:
“Come on it's obvious Kristina and Tre were the final 2 and single mum Kristina bowed out and Tre won!I preferred Kristina.:sleep:”
“Come on it's obvious Kristina and Tre were the final 2 and single mum Kristina bowed out and Tre won!I preferred Kristina.:sleep:”
I saw the end of the interview with SirAlan on Jonathan Ross show. the two people they discussed and brought pictures up were of Tre & Katie and I therefore assumed they decided to discuss them as they won't be in the final rather than have SirAlan make comments on finalists?
If people are basing it someone who'd leave to look after their kids then surely that rules Kristina out - her son is 18.
If you base it on leaving for family reasons then it could be any of them.
If you base it on leaving for family reasons then it could be any of them.
Originally Posted by goochy04:
“If people are basing it someone who'd leave to look after their kids then surely that rules Kristina out - her son is 18.
If you base it on leaving for family reasons then it could be any of them.”
“If people are basing it someone who'd leave to look after their kids then surely that rules Kristina out - her son is 18.
If you base it on leaving for family reasons then it could be any of them.”
That's the 'excuse' the person uses - that they are leaving to look after their 'family' (not neccessarily kids but Jadine, Katie, Kristina and Tre all have children). SAS says it's really because they wanted to 'raise their profile'.
Originally Posted by Cavegirl:
“so the person that started this other thread
sold his story as he had said...he also said he was mistaken about the person in question being
”
“so the person that started this other thread
sold his story as he had said...he also said he was mistaken about the person in question being
Spoiler
They said they`d sold their story to "The Sun" - but it actually appeared in the "Sunday Mirror" - so I`d take it with a pinch of salt, really.
It has Katie written all over it, to me. She didn't go in there looking for a job with Siralan; she wants a media career. The "have to look after my family" line is a fantastic way of neutralising some of her "bitch" persona, so she has benefited from all the attention from being horrible, but she'll manage to reduce the extent to which she's hated by the public with that move, making her more palatable for future media jobs. This way she gets to have her cake and eat it. Well played, that woman. She really is frightfully clever!
No way she sucks. Who he hell would employ her now? She's about as attractive as Jade Goody. Punters are hardly gonna queue up to watch a show fronted by bitchface. 
Originally Posted by brightlights:
“It has Katie written all over it, to me. She didn't go in there looking for a job with Siralan; she wants a media career. The "have to look after my family" line is a fantastic way of neutralising some of her "bitch" persona, so she has benefited from all the attention from being horrible, but she'll manage to reduce the extent to which she's hated by the public with that move, making her more palatable for future media jobs. This way she gets to have her cake and eat it. Well played, that woman. She really is frightfully clever!”
“It has Katie written all over it, to me. She didn't go in there looking for a job with Siralan; she wants a media career. The "have to look after my family" line is a fantastic way of neutralising some of her "bitch" persona, so she has benefited from all the attention from being horrible, but she'll manage to reduce the extent to which she's hated by the public with that move, making her more palatable for future media jobs. This way she gets to have her cake and eat it. Well played, that woman. She really is frightfully clever!”
She is very clever - not a very nice human being, but she knows how to work the media! I'm sure she is very aware that someone out there will give her a job - or she has loads of publicity to start her own business on the back of this.
If AS ever offered her a job, I'd eat my hat - if I had one
Originally Posted by brightlights:
“It has Katie written all over it, to me. She didn't go in there looking for a job with Siralan; she wants a media career. The "have to look after my family" line is a fantastic way of neutralising some of her "bitch" persona, so she has benefited from all the attention from being horrible, but she'll manage to reduce the extent to which she's hated by the public with that move, making her more palatable for future media jobs. This way she gets to have her cake and eat it. Well played, that woman. She really is frightfully clever!”
“It has Katie written all over it, to me. She didn't go in there looking for a job with Siralan; she wants a media career. The "have to look after my family" line is a fantastic way of neutralising some of her "bitch" persona, so she has benefited from all the attention from being horrible, but she'll manage to reduce the extent to which she's hated by the public with that move, making her more palatable for future media jobs. This way she gets to have her cake and eat it. Well played, that woman. She really is frightfully clever!”
I don`t think so. The woman has become the most hated Apprentice candidate ever. Heck - even the audience on "You`re Fired!" has taken to booing her whenever she appears on the screen.
She has no likeable traits whatsoever IMHO. She uses people and spits them out. Plus, I really don`t think she is much good at the job - and her sycophantic, pretentious and snobbish behaviour during the painting/photography task was beyond a joke.
If she is the sort of person SAS wants in his business then it says more about him than it does anything else IMHO.
Originally Posted by geraniums:
“I don`t think so. The woman has become the most hated Apprentice candidate ever. Heck - even the audience on "You`re Fired!" has taken to booing her whenever she appears on the screen.
She has no likeable traits whatsoever IMHO. She uses people and spits them out. Plus, I really don`t think she is much good at the job - and her sycophantic, pretentious and snobbish behaviour during the painting/photography task was beyond a joke.
If she is the sort of person SAS wants in his business then it says more about him than it does anything else IMHO.”
“I don`t think so. The woman has become the most hated Apprentice candidate ever. Heck - even the audience on "You`re Fired!" has taken to booing her whenever she appears on the screen.
She has no likeable traits whatsoever IMHO. She uses people and spits them out. Plus, I really don`t think she is much good at the job - and her sycophantic, pretentious and snobbish behaviour during the painting/photography task was beyond a joke.
If she is the sort of person SAS wants in his business then it says more about him than it does anything else IMHO.
”
If it was me or you geraniums, you're absolutely right. Katie would have no place in my business. However Alan Sugar has shown right throughout his career that he is quite happy to work with people he doesn't like as long as it produces a mutual benefit. Classic example was Jurgen Klinsmann who he took back at Spurs only a couple of years after vowing never to work with him again.
I guess that's why I would never make it on that programme. I am just not ruthless enough to put personal feelings aside.
Originally Posted by horsesmouth:
“If it was me or you geraniums, you're absolutely right. Katie would have no place in my business. However Alan Sugar has shown right throughout his career that he is quite happy to work with people he doesn't like as long as it produces a mutual benefit. Classic example was Jurgen Klinsmann who he took back at Spurs only a couple of years after vowing never to work with him again.
I guess that's why I would never make it on that programme. I am just not ruthless enough to put personal feelings aside.”
“If it was me or you geraniums, you're absolutely right. Katie would have no place in my business. However Alan Sugar has shown right throughout his career that he is quite happy to work with people he doesn't like as long as it produces a mutual benefit. Classic example was Jurgen Klinsmann who he took back at Spurs only a couple of years after vowing never to work with him again.
I guess that's why I would never make it on that programme. I am just not ruthless enough to put personal feelings aside.”
I think there are some people Sir Alan can appreciate rather than like on a personal level - but I don't see Katie being one of them!! If she continues to rub people up the wrong way, be judgemental and downright rude, she would be very disruptive in any organisation
I am so consfused. Could someone please explain it to me?? Reading below may ruin the programme
I understand that someone refuses a job but what is all this about two temporary jobs??
2 of 3
