EXCLUSIVE: Triple firing-2 in the final spoiler!
Originally Posted by Kyle123:
“Oh good
I never believed all the 4 in the final stuff really
Nor did i like it”
“Oh good
I never believed all the 4 in the final stuff really
Nor did i like it
”
Me too!
Originally Posted by jonnythemoose:
“thanks for the spoiler in the title, bigbrother...
”
“thanks for the spoiler in the title, bigbrother...
”
Hardly a spoiler, it would have been higlighted on the previous week's show and "Your Hired!". I'm sorry for any upset I may have caused.
I don't like the interview episodes, they seem sort of unfair, people who've worked well over the however many weeks seem to lose out sometimes because of interviews with people who've never met them before.
Problem is, if it's true and the winner does turn down the job, then the final could be quite pointless.
(Although if the winner in fact hasn't been chosen, that rumour can't be true.)
Problem is, if it's true and the winner does turn down the job, then the final could be quite pointless.
(Although if the winner in fact hasn't been chosen, that rumour can't be true.)
This is no different from the previous years, they're just stopping the tasks at final 5 instead of 4, how is this a spoiler?
It's only a spoiler if you were gullible enough to believe the papers.
It's only a spoiler if you were gullible enough to believe the papers.
Well that's hardly surprising. It has happened in the past two series - more than one goes out at the interview stage. Two are left to fight it out, usually arranging a special evening do somewhere, with the help of previously fired Apprentices.
Originally Posted by Pete Callan:
“This is no different from the previous years, they're just stopping the tasks at final 5 instead of 4, how is this a spoiler?
It's only a spoiler if you were gullible enough to believe the papers.”
“This is no different from the previous years, they're just stopping the tasks at final 5 instead of 4, how is this a spoiler?
It's only a spoiler if you were gullible enough to believe the papers.”
Thank you.
I'd be inclined to question the "evidence".
Wilkipedia lets anyone create and edit entries.
This might be complete hogwash.
Wilkipedia lets anyone create and edit entries.
This might be complete hogwash.
Originally Posted by Red Barrell:
“I'd be inclined to question the "evidence".
Wilkipedia lets anyone create and edit entries.
This might be complete hogwash.”
“I'd be inclined to question the "evidence".
Wilkipedia lets anyone create and edit entries.
This might be complete hogwash.”
Er...I screenshoted it from Windows Media Centre TV Guide.
Originally Posted by bigbrother:
“Er...I screenshoted it from Windows Media Centre TV Guide.”
“Er...I screenshoted it from Windows Media Centre TV Guide.”
And it's the same on my BTVision box
Originally Posted by araucaria:
“Stop putting spoilers in the title you idiot !!!!!!
”
“Stop putting spoilers in the title you idiot !!!!!!
”
what they said
how is this fool not banned?
(not you araucaria!)
it's not exactly a spoiler though is it? 
There have been two previous series where they cut it down to 2 finalists by having an 'interview' stage. So it's not exactly surprising that they are doing it again.
There have been two previous series where they cut it down to 2 finalists by having an 'interview' stage. So it's not exactly surprising that they are doing it again.
