We all know bookies can´t afford to get it wrong.
Why is it that Ben has more favourable odds to Keith, when Ben has been in the bottom two several times and Keith has never been there - when its the same public that decide on the winner?
Is it because people have placed more bets on Ben to win? If so, does this mean there is likely to be a turn in the voting trend as it gets nearer crunch time and peoples money depend on it?
Why is it that Ben has more favourable odds to Keith, when Ben has been in the bottom two several times and Keith has never been there - when its the same public that decide on the winner?
Is it because people have placed more bets on Ben to win? If so, does this mean there is likely to be a turn in the voting trend as it gets nearer crunch time and peoples money depend on it?
But im guessing Lee is the favourite?