• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Past Reality Shows
  • Any Dream Will Do
Zoe interview
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
shoequeen
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“I absolutely agree with this theatregeek. First of all, it's perfectly legitimate to voice concerns about Keith as a performer. This is not 'Keith bashing', it's not personal in any way, it's just stating opinion. For me, acting is a very, very important part of the role and I am not convinced that Keith will do it justice. If he proves me wrong on Saturday, then I'll be delighted. You will notice aswell, that almost every comment that expresses concern about Keith's acting, begins by saying 'he has a lovely voice' - that's hardly bashing, that's just being fair and trying to see the whole picture.

But I really agree with what theatregeek has said about the panel, I don't know why, but they have never addressed this problem which is doing him a big disservice (I think Andrew has, but just in a rather veiled way which has simply confused Keith). It isn't just that Keith's acting needs work, I also believe that he doesn't really understand himself how important it is. This is hardly his fault, because the panel have never told him. And if Andrew decides to make a big deal out of it in the final, and tear him to shreds over it (as he did with Siobhan at exactly the same stage of the competition last year) then that won't be very fair to Keith.”

Laurie - excellent post. Spot on

I think the interesting things is that to me, Ben and Keith have almost entirely opposite strengths and weaknesses. Ben's weaknesses have been discussed at length whilst Keith's haven't.

At the risk of continuing the Ben Debate, I saw his appearance on BBC Breakfast on Monday and he said he thought the winner should be Lee.
LaurieMarlow
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by shoequeen:
“Laurie - excellent post. Spot on

I think the interesting things is that to me, Ben and Keith have almost entirely opposite strengths and weaknesses. Ben's weaknesses have been discussed at length whilst Keith's haven't.

At the risk of continuing the Ben Debate, I saw his appearance on BBC Breakfast on Monday and he said he thought the winner should be Lee.”

Thank you shoequeen Absolutely agree about Ben, they challenged him so much with that 'crying' song, Keith has never been given anything that challenges his acting abilities. I don't know why the panel decided that some contestants should have to jump through hoops every week (like Daniel, 'we need to see you do angry', then next week 'okay, now lets have some heartbreak') whereas others have just been allowed to do their thing and get on with it.
Gillypoots
08-06-2007
My take on the judges attitude to Keith in comparison to say, Ben, is the difference in training and experience that they have had.

Ben, like Lewis, attends a Stage School therefore he has gained far more help and advice over the past couple of years.

Keith on the other hand, in comparison to the remainder of the contestants, is an amateur who happens to have a natural gift and talent that still needs guidance and honing. At the stage he is, he is still learning rights and wrongs and is a work in progress. He does receive criticism and advice on a Saturday night and takes it on board.

The others know a great deal more but have made errors of judgement in their performances when they should have known better.

I have never advocated that Keith should win this contest but should he do so, then good on him!
bluepenguin
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“Thank you shoequeen Absolutely agree about Ben, they challenged him so much with that 'crying' song, Keith has never been given anything that challenges his acting abilities. I don't know why the panel decided that some contestants should have to jump through hoops every week (like Daniel, 'we need to see you do angry', then next week 'okay, now lets have some heartbreak') whereas others have just been allowed to do their thing and get on with it. ”

That is a really good point.
loobyloo11
08-06-2007
Could someone enlighten me to what happened on BBC News 24 yesterday and who was on there and said what, as I think I have lost the plot?
LaurieMarlow
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by Gillypoots:
“My take on the judges attitude to Keith in comparison to say, Ben, is the difference in training and experience that they have had.

Ben, like Lewis, attends a Stage School therefore he has gained far more help and advice over the past couple of years.

Keith on the other hand, in comparison to the remainder of the contestants, is an amateur who happens to have a natural gift and talent that still needs guidance and honing. At the stage he is, he is still learning rights and wrongs and is a work in progress. He does receive criticism and advice on a Saturday night and takes it on board.

The others know a great deal more but have made errors of judgement in their performances when they should have known better.

I have never advocated that Keith should win this contest but should he do so, then good on him! ”

But according to the Joseph website, Keith is doing a HNC in musical theatre in Telford College in Edinburgh and he has also been involved in Stagequest in Edinburgh for years. And I'm not sure about the details, but hasn't he done some professional work too, a ten day UK tour or something? He too has access to professionals to help him hone his talent. I take your point, but I have an idea that Ben hasn't been in stage school for that long and maybe there isn't that much difference in their training.
Gillypoots
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“But according to the Joseph website, Keith is doing a HNC in musical theatre in Telford College in Edinburgh and he has also been involved in Stagequest in Edinburgh for years. And I'm not sure about the details, but hasn't he done some professional work too, a ten day UK tour or something? He too has access to professionals to help him hone his talent. I take your point, but I have an idea that Ben hasn't been in stage school for that long and maybe there isn't that much difference in their training.”

The HNC at Telford College is just the equivalent of an A Level. StageQuest is a theatre workshop which whilst helpful, is not in the same league as a Stage School. His 'tour' was his prize for winning Chigago Rock Cafe Rock Idol which he never undertook because of being given the opportunity of taking part in 'Any Dream Will Do.'

Hardly much in the way of access to professionals on the scale of the others.
loobyloo11
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“But according to the Joseph website, Keith is doing a HNC in musical theatre in Telford College in Edinburgh and he has also been involved in Stagequest in Edinburgh for years. And I'm not sure about the details, but hasn't he done some professional work too, a ten day UK tour or something? He too has access to professionals to help him hone his talent. I take your point, but I have an idea that Ben hasn't been in stage school for that long and maybe there isn't that much difference in their training.”

Ben has been at Italia Conti for about 1 1/2 years. Lewis since the age of 13. I would say that doing a musical theatre course is a lot different than being at a theatre arts school as these are so difficult to get into. Ben was about one of 60 to get a place in the year he went ot of 4000 applicants. I don't know how long Keith has been at his college.
theatregeek
08-06-2007
Laurie - that is exactly my concern re the panel - I have suddenly a horrible concern that its Keith's turn to be stitched up because they really, really want Lee with Lewis as understudy allowing Lewis to take over and Lee to go back to Phantom as a bankable lead. But maybe I'm too cynical.
Talantra
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by theatregeek:
“Laurie - that is exactly my concern re the panel - I have suddenly a horrible concern that its Keith's turn to be stitched up because they really, really want Lee with Lewis as understudy allowing Lewis to take over and Lee to go back to Phantom as a bankable lead. But maybe I'm too cynical.”

Your idea has legs, but surely Lee must keep doing Joseph for a year or so because of the people that have voted for him? Do you think ALW is really scheming for 2009 already?

(Obviously making some foregone conclusions here)

Lee for new lead in Phantom 2?
theatregeek
08-06-2007
Quote:
“Ben, like Lewis, attends a Stage School therefore he has gained far more help and advice over the past couple of years.

Keith on the other hand, in comparison to the remainder of the contestants, is an amateur who happens to have a natural gift and talent that still needs guidance and honing. At the stage he is, he is still learning rights and wrongs and is a work in progress. He does receive criticism and advice on a Saturday night and takes it on board.

The others know a great deal more but have made errors of judgement in their performances when they should have known better.”

Sorry but that sounds like you think Ben (and Lewis) should be penalised because they have had more training. Couldn't Keith also have gone to London to train if the course he is doing is not good enough? I agree some allowance in the early stages is good but by now isn't it a bit late. Follow that argument to the end then Lee should not win because he has more experience.
Phil2003
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by theatregeek:
“Sorry but that sounds like you think Ben (and Lewis) should be penalised because they have had more training. Couldn't Keith also have gone to London to train if the course he is doing is not good enough? I agree some allowance in the early stages is good but by now isn't it a bit late. Follow that argument to the end then Lee should not win because he has more experience.”

I agree. The argument about who's had the most training could be relevant if we're talking about who has the most potential, but this show is about casting someone now.
theatregeek
08-06-2007
Quote:
“Your idea has legs, but surely Lee must keep doing Joseph for a year or so because of the people that have voted for him?”

No its a limited run - less than a year but can't remember how long - that of course can always be extended.
LaurieMarlow
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by theatregeek:
“Laurie - that is exactly my concern re the panel - I have suddenly a horrible concern that its Keith's turn to be stitched up because they really, really want Lee with Lewis as understudy allowing Lewis to take over and Lee to go back to Phantom as a bankable lead. But maybe I'm too cynical.”

Hmm, interesting idea there theatregeek, you might well be right. It is my opinion that right from the start, Andrew and Bill (though none of the others) have wanted Lewis in the part, but as you say, runner up would work too, because that way strings could be pulled to get him involved.

They might well try to stitch Keith up on Saturday, but I doubt it will work, because I just don't think Lewis has the fan base to overtake him. No matter what happens, I think Lewis will be the also-ran in this final.

And in reply to Gillypoots, everyone's training is relative, but we need to bear in mind that not one of the top 12 Josephs were genuinely picked off the street, no matter what angle has been emphasised by the BBC.
Gillypoots
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by theatregeek:
“Sorry but that sounds like you think Ben (and Lewis) should be penalised because they have had more training. Couldn't Keith also have gone to London to train if the course he is doing is not good enough? I agree some allowance in the early stages is good but by now isn't it a bit late. Follow that argument to the end then Lee should not win because he has more experience.”

Not at all. I'm just making the comment that Keith has not taken the same path as Ben, or Lewis for that matter and therefore isn't as enlightened as they are.

How can anyone know the reasons why Keith has stayed put. I do know that you can't just walk into Stage School no matter how talented. It may be financial constraints or it may be that up until now Keith has been happy to remain at home with his family. Alternatively, he may well have been considering his options as to what direction he wanted to go musically.

No matter what the reasoning or thinking, the mere fact that even with his limited experience, his natural talent and ability has brought him a long way in this contest. That says it all for me.
Vix1
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by Gillypoots:
“The HNC at Telford College is just the equivalent of an A Level. StageQuest is a theatre workshop which whilst helpful, is not in the same league as a Stage School. His 'tour' was his prize for winning Chigago Rock Cafe Rock Idol which he never undertook because of being given the opportunity of taking part in 'Any Dream Will Do.'

Hardly much in the way of access to professionals on the scale of the others.”


Sorry to pick you up on this but an HNC is not an equivalent of an A level. I run an HNC at a University (in something entirely different) and it counts as the first year of a degree course. YOu need an A level to get on to an HNC.

I agree Keith has a natural talent but he leaves me cold and his attitude is appalling. When he gets praise he stands their nodding "oh how right you are when you say I am brilliant" kind of thing.

Personally I hope he goes out first on Saturday.
Gillypoots
08-06-2007
[quote=LaurieMarlow;15146588]Hmm, interesting idea there theatregeek, you might well be right. It is my opinion that right from the start, Andrew and Bill (though none of the others) have wanted Lewis in the part, but as you say, runner up would work too, because that way strings could be pulled to get him involved.

They might well try to stitch Keith up on Saturday, but I doubt it will work, because I just don't think Lewis has the fan base to overtake him. No matter what happens, I think Lewis will be the also-ran in this final.

And in reply to Gillypoots, everyone's training is relative, but we need to bear in mind that not one of the top 12 Josephs were genuinely picked off the street, no matter what angle has been emphasised by the BBC.[/QUOTE]

I don't believe that I have made much more of previous experience than any other poster on this forum who wished to comment.

My remarks were simply to make the point that Keith is much more an amateur with talent and a lot less training, that's all.
Phil2003
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by Vix1:
“Sorry to pick you up on this but an HNC is not an equivalent of an A level. I run an HNC at a University (in something entirely different) and it counts as the first year of a degree course. YOu need an A level to get on to an HNC.

I agree Keith has a natural talent but he leaves me cold and his attitude is appalling. When he gets praise he stands their nodding "oh how right you are when you say I am brilliant" kind of thing.

Personally I hope he goes out first on Saturday.”

Interesting about the HNC - I also had the impression it was a much lower level than it clearly is.

I'm not quite sure about your point about Keith's attitude - what's he supposed to do if the judges like him? Disagree?
LaurieMarlow
08-06-2007
[quote=Gillypoots;15146918]
Originally Posted by LaurieMarlow:
“Hmm, interesting idea there theatregeek, you might well be right. It is my opinion that right from the start, Andrew and Bill (though none of the others) have wanted Lewis in the part, but as you say, runner up would work too, because that way strings could be pulled to get him involved.

They might well try to stitch Keith up on Saturday, but I doubt it will work, because I just don't think Lewis has the fan base to overtake him. No matter what happens, I think Lewis will be the also-ran in this final.

And in reply to Gillypoots, everyone's training is relative, but we need to bear in mind that not one of the top 12 Josephs were genuinely picked off the street, no matter what angle has been emphasised by the BBC.[/QUOTE]

I don't believe that I have made much more of previous experience than any other poster on this forum who wished to comment.

My remarks were simply to make the point that Keith is much more an amateur with talent and a lot less training, that's all.”

Well apologies if I took you up wrongly

My only point is that although there is a clear difference in amount of previous experience, none of the top 12 had been picked off the street, having never had any training or experience at all.
theatregeek
08-06-2007
Quote:
“They might well try to stitch Keith up on Saturday, but I doubt it will work, because I just don't think Lewis has the fan base to overtake him. No matter what happens, I think Lewis will be the also-ran in this final.”

I agree that is where it does rather fall down - but I shall be watching on Saturday for evidence of Josephgate

And on Sunday I'm off to disprove the moon landing.
Eryndil
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by theatregeek:
“I agree that is where it does rather fall down - but I shall be watching on Saturday for evidence of Josephgate

And on Sunday I'm off to disprove the moon landing.”

I don't believe there are really any Josephs at all - it's all done with mirrors
bev2110
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by Eryndil:
“I don't believe there are really any Josephs at all - it's all done with mirrors ”


The Apollo landing all over again??

.
Eryndil
08-06-2007
Originally Posted by bev2110:
“The Apollo landing all over again??

.”

Bah 'moon landing' - it was filmed in my spare room you know Or else it was aliens...or something
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map