Michelle came across as a nasty, venomous cow who couldn't put together a reasoned and measured dissection of Katie's contribution in the show.
Fine, Katie certainly did overstep the mark on a number of occasions with unnecessarily nasty snipes about fellow contestants and sections of the public. However, she didn't have the knives out for me specifcally as I am not a Northern car sales-person called Mavis who watches home shopping channels whilst sat on a rug
Personally (and I know this won't be popular) I think Katie was articulate, intelligent, had a better head for business than most of the candidates in there (despite a couple of notable lapses) and conducted herself with more decorum than MM could possibly muster. In the interests of balance, yes, she was definitely scheming and duplicitous. Incidentally, has she had "work done" since the filming - she seemed to look a lot better in the "You're Fired" show?
I earn less than £90k but consider myself a success (well, to some degree at least!) I think MM's comments here could be considered disparaging by quite a large cross-section.
As pointed out previously, the bloke she "stole" has to take equal share of the blame for this, although I am certainly not sticking up for her conduct. This is in any case, very amoral and if this constitutes a mere 8 out of 10 on the ruthlessness scale...
Finally, and most importantly, what gives that presumptuous, self-important, over-made-up, publicity hungry, condescending b***h (oh, maybe clarification needed here - Michelle!) the right to say she "SPEAKS FOR THE NATION"*.
* Don't know if she is a Scottish Nationalist, in which case, being English, I may actually be ruled out of her speaking on behalf of the nation.