Originally Posted by pinkee:
“I'll give the interviewer the benefit of the doubt, I don't think he meant to connect privilige with going to Cambridge.
Cambridge is not like it used to be. My daughter is there at the moment and a majority of her fellow students are just like her, from 'ordinary' backgrounds but obviously hard working and very intelligent. I know how hard she had to work to get there and how high the standard is that is expected of her.
If Simon graduated a year early with a 2:1 he must be incredibly intelligent but has probably not found the right vehicle for his potential.
Love Mary x”
“I'll give the interviewer the benefit of the doubt, I don't think he meant to connect privilige with going to Cambridge.
Cambridge is not like it used to be. My daughter is there at the moment and a majority of her fellow students are just like her, from 'ordinary' backgrounds but obviously hard working and very intelligent. I know how hard she had to work to get there and how high the standard is that is expected of her.
If Simon graduated a year early with a 2:1 he must be incredibly intelligent but has probably not found the right vehicle for his potential.
Love Mary x”
I agree.
There are all sorts of benign reasons why people underachieve or fail to fulfil their potential. It doesn't necessarily mean they lack drive or that there is something wrong with them. It just means they haven't yet been given the right working opportunities to allow them to shine. Or there might be personal circumstances or personal illness that disadvantages them. You can have all the talent and ambition in the world but it is no use if it is not matched by job opportunities.
Also I read an article in a science journal that pointed out that highly intelligent, able people can be prone to depression or burnout if their job is not sufficiently stimulating or doesn't match their expectations or aspirations, resulting in disillusionment and withdrawal.



