I think the press are reacting to Simon winning in an completley inappropriate way. Kay Burley was just interviewing him on Sky News and was just incredibly rude to him. It's not Simon's fault Sir Alan picked him.
Simon went with Rory's idea on the basis that the team preferred it overall - and it was a highly striking design. It may have resembled something slightly phallic - but that in itself would generate publicity for the building, which at the end of the day is what SAS wants.
The dancing girls were neither here nor there. However I thought that they made Simon's presentation look much more polished and professional than Kristina's. His team had planned all the aspects of their presentation, whereas it felt like Kristina just had a CD player and a speech.
Simon's presentation was alot stronger than Kristina's. At the end of the day, what the building looked like didn't really come into what Sir Alan was looking at. It was just a base for them to set their whole presentation around. He wanted to know who could draw up the financial plans, put together a presentation and sell something in a speech to a large group (which ultimatley is what the end job was based around)
Kristina relied too heavily on Paul - who as the unseen clips show on the website - completley mucked it up. And by alienating Adam and Natalie, I don't think she really generated any team spirit.
Margaret picked up on Simon having an A Team and B Team, but he toned his down and bought his team together, whereas with Kristina she always had Paul and Naomi as her A Team and Adam and Natalie as the B Team.
Simon was better than Kristina in the final task in my opinion and that is what gave him the edge over her when it came to picking a winner.
At the end of the day it's a tv show. In the long run who is employed by Sir Alan doesn't actually affect anyone.