Every time im flipping through the channels and I see a clip of EE, he is allways pulling the same smirking face in every scene.
Sean EE
1 of 2
Originally Posted by xxxkikixxx:
“ha he needs to invest in some new facial expressions!
”
“ha he needs to invest in some new facial expressions!
”
Nooo I like the ones he has now.
For me he is a bad version of the Joker in Batman 
I know he has his fans but personally I can't stand the character.
But then it would be boring if we all liked the same characters wouldn't it?
I know he has his fans but personally I can't stand the character.
But then it would be boring if we all liked the same characters wouldn't it?
Yeah true...
As people on here know I aint a fan of his...
Its mainly becuase of the way the writers make him out to be a hardman, he doesn't give off the image...
I think he is much better as a womaniser.
I would like to see a storyline which involves him being in some sort of debt to a gangster.
As people on here know I aint a fan of his...
Its mainly becuase of the way the writers make him out to be a hardman, he doesn't give off the image...
I think he is much better as a womaniser.
I would like to see a storyline which involves him being in some sort of debt to a gangster.
Originally Posted by JxT-Ent92:
“I would like to see a storyline which involves him being in some sort of debt to a gangster.”
“I would like to see a storyline which involves him being in some sort of debt to a gangster.”
nooo! Eastenders went through a tunnel of that a little while ago, and has been dragging its arse along the carpet ever since!
ever since the whole London Mafia thing they had going on started, the show's been rubbish.
I find Sean to be a poorly written, boring, confusing and unlikeable character with no redeeming qualities, and the smirking does indeed wear thin.
Originally Posted by Fizzy Dog:
“I find Sean to be a poorly written, boring, confusing and unlikeable character with no redeeming qualities, and the smirking does indeed wear thin.”
“I find Sean to be a poorly written, boring, confusing and unlikeable character with no redeeming qualities, and the smirking does indeed wear thin.”
I agree. I just don't see his purpose in the Square. He shouldn't be there.
Originally Posted by Fizzy Dog:
“I find Sean to be a poorly written, boring, confusing and unlikeable character with no redeeming qualities, and the smirking does indeed wear thin.”
“I find Sean to be a poorly written, boring, confusing and unlikeable character with no redeeming qualities, and the smirking does indeed wear thin.”
I think he himself has partly to blame for that. His suspension meant he was away for ages and that means people are going to care for him alot less now.
I also think they need to crack on with the Jean storyline ASAP!! Gogogo
Originally Posted by kyri:
“I agree. I just don't see his purpose in the Square. He shouldn't be there.”
“I agree. I just don't see his purpose in the Square. He shouldn't be there.”
I really do not understand this...he's Stacey's brother, one of the Slater brood if you don't see his purpose now maybe you will see it when the Jean story (if there is one...I'm beginning to wonder) comes out.
Of course he has a purpose in the square, to entertain us and for an awful lot of us he's doing that.
Originally Posted by Rysen:
“I really do not understand this...he's Stacey's brother, one of the Slater brood if you don't see his purpose now maybe you will see it when the Jean story (if there is one...I'm beginning to wonder) comes out.
Of course he has a purpose in the square, to entertain us and for an awful lot of us he's doing that.”
“I really do not understand this...he's Stacey's brother, one of the Slater brood if you don't see his purpose now maybe you will see it when the Jean story (if there is one...I'm beginning to wonder) comes out.
Of course he has a purpose in the square, to entertain us and for an awful lot of us he's doing that.”
you mean there might not be a stacey/sean/jean story???
Originally Posted by soapaddictDS:
“you mean there might not be a stacey/sean/jean story??? ”
“you mean there might not be a stacey/sean/jean story???
”
Well there was supposed to be but they haven't got round to it yet.
Originally Posted by Rysen:
“I really do not understand this...he's Stacey's brother, one of the Slater brood if you don't see his purpose now maybe you will see it when the Jean story (if there is one...I'm beginning to wonder) comes out.
Of course he has a purpose in the square, to entertain us and for an awful lot of us he's doing that.”
“I really do not understand this...he's Stacey's brother, one of the Slater brood if you don't see his purpose now maybe you will see it when the Jean story (if there is one...I'm beginning to wonder) comes out.
Of course he has a purpose in the square, to entertain us and for an awful lot of us he's doing that.”
So what if he is Stacey's brother? Didn't stop his character walking out on her all those years ago did it? He just wouldn't be in the Square, he would be travelling or something. Not stuck in some grotty East end pub.
Originally Posted by Rysen:
“Yeah well he's sticking around lol. An awful lot of us like him kyri so he has a purpose.”
“Yeah well he's sticking around lol. An awful lot of us like him kyri so he has a purpose.”
I couldn't care less if he had the biggest Eastenders fanbase ever. I don't really hate him that much - i just don't see why his character would be in the square
Originally Posted by kyri:
“I couldn't care less if he had the biggest Eastenders fanbase ever. I don't really hate him that much - i just don't see why his character would be in the square”
“I couldn't care less if he had the biggest Eastenders fanbase ever. I don't really hate him that much - i just don't see why his character would be in the square
”
Because he's entertaining us.
1 of 2
