Originally Posted by Fox Mulder:
“yes i had a great great grandmother who survived the disaster but her husband did not, yes some may find it offensive but you normally find those that do have no direct link to the tragic events of 1912, i do and i can't see how anyone can be offended by the possibility of the titanic in dr who, many films have been done about various real world events i.e world trade centre, ww1 and 2 ect yet no one complains, we can't live for the past we move on and live for the future, as my granny said of the titanic film of the 50's, nothing will bring her dad back but people have survived worse and after all its a story that will be told be it thru fiction, fantasy or true life, her words not mine.
its time to wait and enjoy a good story to come and for the obsessives to live a little bit”
I completely respect your opinion and understand where you are coming from.
I am most certainly not an obsessive though.
I was just pointing out that the real tragedy that was the sinking of the
Titanic should not be used frivilously i.e. showing it being sunk by the TARDIS or Sea Devils etc.
That is rather different from a
historical epic like the movie (although even that was questionable when it suggested the lookout was distracted by Rose and Jack).
That all said, I do strongly suspect that it will NOT be the supposed "real"
Titanic that is involved in the Christmas plotline.