Originally Posted by Coolies:
“well she has won when she has needed to”
That's true. But there have also been times when she has won when she hasn't needed to. For example the last POV, once it was just her and Amber, she could have let Amber win. Amber would have used the Veto, and Dani would still be able to put Jen up just the same. However, doing it that way, it it would have appeared less like she had deliberately set out to backdoor Jen all along and it would have made the target on her back smaller, cos if I was one of the others, her winning all the comps, would make her a huge target to get rid of.
Quote:
“Jen totally went down in my estimations when she was nominated she acted like a spoilt child "I'm not going to sequester" etc”
Trouble is, we do not really know for sure what was going through Jen's head at this time (does anyone ever know?

). Was this for real, was it an act or (spoilers as this is a non-live feed thread)
Quote:
“Put it this way who would you rather win Amber, Zach, Jameka or Danielle? I'd rather have someone who has played the game”
This is the trouble with the US BB, by this stage, there is usually no one I would rather win!
If I had to pick, then I think I would like Zack to win. Unlike others, I see the floaters as using just as legitimate a tactic (and in some ways a harder tactic to pull off), as those who supposedly 'Play the game'. But sure, I can also understand why those who like the full on gameplayers and don't take personality into account would go for Dani.