|
||||||||
Les Batterby's trial |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
Les Batterby's trial
I had thought that previous convictions couldn't be given in evidence in a criminal trial until after sentence, the idea being that the the jury should deal with the facts of the case only. Previous convictions only become relevant after conviction and the judge (not the jury) takes these into account for sentencing.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I thought about that too. But of course, what happend in the land of soaps, Ric?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: UK, South West
Posts: 16
|
Re:
How's he going to get out of jail (speculation please)........!?
Will he rot in prison (like that McDonald chap) or will Emma come clean? If she does, will SHE get sentenced and go on the run - taking Curly with her (so they can write him out)...? Will Janice slip him a cake with a file in it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
Emma doesn't come clean and she gets promoted to the rank of Inspector and moves away with Curly. Guess he will rot in jail, unless it goes to appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Disconnected from Reality
Posts: 375
|
And are witnesses allowed to sit in the public gallery after giving evidence??
That didnt seem right to me even if they are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
Quote:
Originally posted by simalo Yes they are although it is up to them. The Police generally stay as it is they who have initiated the prosecution by the initial charge. What they cannot do in criminal trials is to be in Court before they give evidence (as demonstrated by PC Mick and Sgt Emma loudly arguing about possible perjury outside the Court). By contrast in a civil Court the witnesses can sit in Court and hear all the evidence given.
And are witnesses allowed to sit in the public gallery after giving evidence?? That didnt seem right to me even if they are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,101
|
As soon as the defendant (les) or his solicitor attacks the character of any of the prosecution witnesses, the posectoion is entitled to attack his character, by, for example, revealing his previous convictions.. That's why Les was told not to say what he did.
It is, howver, normal to ask permission from the judge though |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: London
Posts: 13
|
Aside from the 'shield' principle (attacking a the character of a prosecution witness, resulting in the loss of your character shield) there is a second common method of your previous convictions being put before the court.
I don't watch Corrie so apologies if this would not apply. The similar fact rules of evidence can result in previous convictions being revealed. The idea being that if someone regularly goes round beating people up, biting a chunk out of their ear and then kissing the victim on the head before they flee (wacky example I know) then if they have been indicted of the same thing again, the jury/magistrates can be told of the person's so called 'signature' style. On the whole soap trials are an awful misrepresentation of court procedure. Whilst I agree that much of what takes place in a court room might not make great TV, the fact remains that more people watch soaps than have attended a trial and sadly have a warped view of what goes on in court. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
So, basically if Les hadn't mouthed in Court off he'd probably have got off considering he had a "surprise" witness (was his evidence disclosed to the CPS?)
It looks as if he'll do his time and we can watch as Kirk and Fizz visit every now and again. Well, it will only be a couple of months and by the time Les gets out Emma (die, Emma, die) and Curly will have moved out of the street
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,142
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ishan I made a similar comment in another forum. So glad to see someone agrees with me.
[B On the whole soap trials are an awful misrepresentation of court procedure. Whilst I agree that much of what takes place in a court room might not make great TV, the fact remains that more people watch soaps than have attended a trial and sadly have a warped view of what goes on in court. [/b] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,142
|
Re: Les Batterby's trial
Quote:
Originally posted by ric9380 Coronation Street excel in twisting Court procedures so you should take their trials with a large pinch of salt. In reality, Les would not have been sentenced on the same day as being convicted. The Judge should have asked for probation reports and his barrister would have made representations on his behalf to try and reduce his sentence.
I had thought that previous convictions couldn't be given in evidence in a criminal trial until after sentence, the idea being that the the jury should deal with the facts of the case only. Previous convictions only become relevant after conviction and the judge (not the jury) takes these into account for sentencing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
Yeah, but it makes good telly.
In fairness to the producers they have acknowledged that their aim was to entertain. The vast number of trials that I've attended (in a professional capacity, of course) have been far from enteraining although there's always the odd one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North-West UK
Posts: 2,820
|
Quote:
The vast number of trials that I've attended (in a professional capacity, of course)
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Essex
Posts: 322
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ric9380 Q: What do you call a geordie in a suit?The vast number of trials that I've attended (in a professional capacity, of course) ...[/b] A: The defendant
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Posts: 721
|
Quote:
Originally posted by John8418 Q: What do you call a geordie in a suit? A: The defendant
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:03.

