First of all, can I just say that I don't want this to turn into a fanboy's "mine's better than yours" thread, as far too many of these things seem to...
Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that for me, Bluetooth is a marvelous technology, that "does exactly what it says on the tin". Yet for some reason the majority of manufacturers seem to be ignoring it, or at best offering support for a limited number of profiles.
Sony-Ericsson released the first real mass-market phone incorporating Bluetooth over 18 months ago, with the T68, and later the T68i. The BT functions of this phone were well ahead of their time -- even now, no other phone (except SE's P800, which uses the same Bluetooth subsystem) has come close. The trouble is, no-one seems to want to, either.
But why is this? It's a mystery to me. A system where you can get into your car, turn on the ignition and be instantly connected to the handsfree kit seems like a good thing to me. A system where you walk into your office, your computer detects your presence and downloads your schedule to your phone/PDA. A system where you can use your mobile as a remote control for the media player on your PC, so that it pauses when you go out of the room and switches on when you come back. All this can be done today, at very little cost (I bought a Bluetooth USB adaptor a couple of months ago for £20). It's a mystery to me why phone manufacturers continue to only incorporate Bluetooth in their high-end product, rather than following SE's lead and including it in mainstream phones.
I know I'm going to get people's backs up with this, but I think a lot of the blame lies with Nokia. They're the market leaders, and where they go, others follow. Yet they have been painfully slow on the uptake with Bluetooth. The 7650, a supposed 'smartphone', doesn't support bluetooth for anything but data transfer. Nokia's flagship 3650, an otherwise fantastic phone, doesn't support the "Headset" profile used by, er, bluetooth headsets (ironically, this means the official Nokia BT headset doesn't work with it, while the latest Sony-Ericsson one -- which uses the 'handsfree" profile as well as "headset" -- does).
If Nokia had made the decision to include Bluetooth in the 6xxx and 7xxx ranges, and the 3510i (their mainstream handsets) then we would see a much quicker adoption of bluetooth by the general public. Prices would fall, and manufacturers would begin to look for new and innovative uses for this great technology.
Sorry to eulogise there, but you get the point -- I really like Bluetooth. It frustrates me that no other phone I look at to replace my T68i supports it as well as that phone, if at all. This must be a ploicy decision on the part of the manufacturers to hold back bluetooth from thier popular models, but I really can't understand why. Please explain!
Anyway, the point I was trying to make was that for me, Bluetooth is a marvelous technology, that "does exactly what it says on the tin". Yet for some reason the majority of manufacturers seem to be ignoring it, or at best offering support for a limited number of profiles.
Sony-Ericsson released the first real mass-market phone incorporating Bluetooth over 18 months ago, with the T68, and later the T68i. The BT functions of this phone were well ahead of their time -- even now, no other phone (except SE's P800, which uses the same Bluetooth subsystem) has come close. The trouble is, no-one seems to want to, either.
But why is this? It's a mystery to me. A system where you can get into your car, turn on the ignition and be instantly connected to the handsfree kit seems like a good thing to me. A system where you walk into your office, your computer detects your presence and downloads your schedule to your phone/PDA. A system where you can use your mobile as a remote control for the media player on your PC, so that it pauses when you go out of the room and switches on when you come back. All this can be done today, at very little cost (I bought a Bluetooth USB adaptor a couple of months ago for £20). It's a mystery to me why phone manufacturers continue to only incorporate Bluetooth in their high-end product, rather than following SE's lead and including it in mainstream phones.
I know I'm going to get people's backs up with this, but I think a lot of the blame lies with Nokia. They're the market leaders, and where they go, others follow. Yet they have been painfully slow on the uptake with Bluetooth. The 7650, a supposed 'smartphone', doesn't support bluetooth for anything but data transfer. Nokia's flagship 3650, an otherwise fantastic phone, doesn't support the "Headset" profile used by, er, bluetooth headsets (ironically, this means the official Nokia BT headset doesn't work with it, while the latest Sony-Ericsson one -- which uses the 'handsfree" profile as well as "headset" -- does).
If Nokia had made the decision to include Bluetooth in the 6xxx and 7xxx ranges, and the 3510i (their mainstream handsets) then we would see a much quicker adoption of bluetooth by the general public. Prices would fall, and manufacturers would begin to look for new and innovative uses for this great technology.
Sorry to eulogise there, but you get the point -- I really like Bluetooth. It frustrates me that no other phone I look at to replace my T68i supports it as well as that phone, if at all. This must be a ploicy decision on the part of the manufacturers to hold back bluetooth from thier popular models, but I really can't understand why. Please explain!