|
||||||||
Calling neutrals! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 373
|
Calling neutrals!
Was I the only one whom watched Big Brother 3 who couldn't give a fig who won in the end!
Was I the only one who was a neutral last year? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 8,914
|
lol Probably - we all had views last year - I wanted Spanky to win......
mmmmmm Spanky.......... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 8,627
|
I'm pretty neutral, and was last year too. Think of me as a kind of Switzerland, only without the Nazi gold and cuckoo clocks.
I'm keeping the Toblerone though! ![]() I did find most of them quite laughably shallow last year, some of them intensely annoying, but at no point was I even slightly tempted to 'support' any of them. To paraphrase a comment I once saw in this very forum, I find all of them, for different reasons, equally contemptible. That's actually a bit harsh, but you get my drift.BBG |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
Originally posted by asjonesuk hang on a minute!!!!! anyone you don't fancy????lol Probably - we all had views last year - I wanted Spanky to win...... mmmmmm Spanky.......... it was Lewis less than a minute ago!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 361
|
I, in the end wanted Kate to win. Not quite sure why, I didn't like Alex much and Jonny was a definite no-no for me - too much of a loud mouthed gobshite for my liking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,184
|
Erm i wanted Jade to win!
Though for CBB2 i didn't give a "dogs cack" who won lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 373
|
Too be honest I never really liked any of them. I thought they were all playing game. That none of them were themselves, I suppose that was understandable considering where they were.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 373
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Boutros B Ghali Great I am not the only then!
I'm pretty neutral, and was last year too. Think of me as a kind of Switzerland, only without the Nazi gold and cuckoo clocks. I'm keeping the Toblerone though! ![]() I did find most of them quite laughably shallow last year, some of them intensely annoying, but at no point was I even slightly tempted to 'support' any of them. To paraphrase a comment I once saw in this very forum, I find all of them, for different reasons, equally contemptible. That's actually a bit harsh, but you get my drift.BBG |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: York, UK
Posts: 4,511
|
There's degrees of neutrality though, aren't there.
It's only natural to favour some housemates over others while it's running, that's rather the point of the show after all. However! I'm completely gobsmacked that anyone still claims to care enough about Alex, Kate, Jonny or Jade and their respective Ajax-ads, presenting jobs, pantomime Buttons or driving tests to think it's STILL worth getting worked up on a forty-plus-page holy war thread defending / attacking them even today. To me they're ALL a bit last year, even though I liked some/hated some at the time. I mean, does anyone still claim to be a 'Helen & Paul fan'? I mean, wish them well and all that, but a 'fan'?! Will they still be bickered over so fiercely by Monday? Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Planet Jedward
Posts: 11,202
|
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not what you'd call a BB fan.
It was Alex that cought my attention and Alex I'm still interested in. I dipped into BB2 and had favorites of course, but as you say, wished them well and then forgot them. Alex is different and I can't explain why. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 11,669
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bob.stone Totally agree with you. I totally lost interest in them all after BB.There's degrees of neutrality though, aren't there. It's only natural to favour some housemates over others while it's running, that's rather the point of the show after all. However! I'm completely gobsmacked that anyone still claims to care enough about Alex, Kate, Jonny or Jade and their respective Ajax-ads, presenting jobs, pantomime Buttons or driving tests to think it's STILL worth getting worked up on a forty-plus-page holy war thread defending / attacking them even today. To me they're ALL a bit last year, even though I liked some/hated some at the time. I mean, does anyone still claim to be a 'Helen & Paul fan'? I mean, wish them well and all that, but a 'fan'?! Will they still be bickered over so fiercely by Monday? Bob
BUT, this will interest you, here's a site full of devoted Paul and Helen fans, www.thisisbigbrother.com They are still fascinated by them two years on! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: York, UK
Posts: 4,511
|
I bet they like blinking, they do...
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 373
|
I was a neutral! Most of the time I just laughed about how stupid the HM's were and couldn't believe the way they behaved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,693
|
I didn't care really. I wanted Johnny to go first just for the look of surprise on all of their faces.
I was fine with Alex or Kate winning. As long as pig features didn't win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,184
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gazza71 Lala loves jadeAs long as pig features didn't win. Well Kates is an awfull presenter, and as for Alex........ well i can't comment on him because i don't know what he is doing now. At least is making the most of it and isn't stuck up like the rest of them. She knows her fame won't last and she's not kidding her self and going into presenting .......unlike Kate |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,175
|
I'm not a neutral by any means, cause in every series there seems to be at least one contestant who repels me, and I get disappointed cause the people I like never win, but I suppose I'm a bit neutral in that I never vote and I never will!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,693
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lala Only because she can't read.
At least is making the most of it and isn't stuck up like the rest of them. She knows her fame won't last and she's not kidding her self and going into presenting |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bob.stone You leave my thread alone damn you Bob.stone.......There's degrees of neutrality though, aren't there. It's only natural to favour some housemates over others while it's running, that's rather the point of the show after all. However! I'm completely gobsmacked that anyone still claims to care enough about Alex, Kate, Jonny or Jade and their respective Ajax-ads, presenting jobs, pantomime Buttons or driving tests to think it's STILL worth getting worked up on a forty-plus-page holy war thread defending / attacking them even today. To me they're ALL a bit last year, even though I liked some/hated some at the time. I mean, does anyone still claim to be a 'Helen & Paul fan'? I mean, wish them well and all that, but a 'fan'?! Will they still be bickered over so fiercely by Monday? Bob
I hated Jade...........Everything else was incidental... Of course on Monday it will be Jade who? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: The Black Country, Bostin!
Posts: 3,366
|
<SEXIST>
I wanted Kate to win, but only coz she had a nice arse! </SEXIST>
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gazza71 BWAAAHH!! I like Jade but that was funny.
Only because she can't read. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 20,184
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Digital.Diablo I am sorry, speaking as a women i don't think Kates arse was great, full of cellulite! She's no Kylie is she <SEXIST> I wanted Kate to win, but only coz she had a nice arse! </SEXIST>
And how are you sexist just because you said Kate has a good arse? Mad world |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
I wonder how much jars of boiled Kate Knicker Soup would go for on EBay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lala That's a pretty high standard you are setting there !!I am sorry, speaking as a women i don't think Kates arse was great, full of cellulite! She's no Kylie is she ps good luck tomorrow, media studies, piece of cake !!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: The Black Country, Bostin!
Posts: 3,366
|
Ahh your damned if you do, and your damned if you dont!!
HeHe Kate has (or maybe had - I haven't seen her in a while) had a nice arse, coz it was natural - Not perfect, not moulded in the Hollywood-buttmachine 2000, but natural. Its nice to see a normal ass on telly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 42,514
|
Alison's ass was natural as well......
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54.




That's actually a bit harsh, but you get my drift.
