On her Capital show on Sunday, Kate said that they were really pleased because the programme had got its best ever listening figures. I imagine contracts will be up for renewal in October, so this looks like good news.
I've spent a bit of time looking for any supporting information. I haven't found any specifically about their programme, but the recently released Rajar figures are mentioned in a Media Guardian article which discusses Capital but concentrates on breakfast.
Earlier articles giving poorer figures were posted with alacrity, but not this one. Hmmmmm. Anyway, the link is
http://media.guardian.co.uk/radio/st...009641,00.html
She also mentioned that she had received an e-mail asking about her and Ray. She said very clearly that the newspaper report was untrue. Ray also said on BB Diaries that it was a load of bleep, they hadn't slept together but they had kissed. He actually sounded sincere to me.
There is no doubt that denial is the second phase of a publicity process, but it is also the valid reaction to an untruth.
A thread on this subject was closed following heavy argument. I avoided posting in the 'full heat' and I'm only raising it now because she did. I hope we can avoid repeating the bile and the course of the original thread.
I agree with this post
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...80#post1162080 from that thread with the following additions. A high proportion of this type of tabloid story are ridiculous, the Tania chocolate story probably leads the field, but it does conflict.
Kate has said in the past that the 3am girls were her least favourite of the tabloid press, based on previous experience. Anything they say about their targets I take with an extra pinch of salt.
With her present success, I doubt that she wants or needs this sort of publicity. Six or nine months ago it may have been different. On the other hand, It's possible that Ray's agents could feel he does already need it to maintain his perceived Beatlemania level of adulation, but my favourite is the ongoing 3am issue..
It may have been her idea, but I suspect the party was inspired by the docu-makers. I also suspect that her mentioning it in advance was an attempt to avoid this type of article by being open about it. If so, it didn't work, but that does not mean it wasn't the intention.
The article doesn't mention the time the party finished, and the convincing sources are (from memory) a spy and an insider. Kate and Ray were on RI:SE the next morning (Thursday) along with Jon (and Fed?). I know there's makeup, but none of them looked the worse for wear to me.
Indeed, having declined to do his allotted piece on tv once earlier in the week due to tiredness/fragility, he did do it with the mediocrity consistent with his first attempt.
Thursday was also the morning where Kate managed to come out with Anna Korkinova in the first news piece. The way she dealt with that and even turned it into something funny/positive was not the product of someone with severe sleep deprivation.
None of this proves anything, but I think it's clear where I stand.

It's time to post some good news to balance the account, so I say well done on the Capital listening figures.