• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Former HMs News.
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Candice
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
I was talking to Eejay. ”

I had the same opinion as Eejay, didn't see you requote him so your reply could have easily applied to me and I had a different take to you.

Pardon me for not grasping it had become a private discussion on an open forum.
EddyBee
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Maxiii
'Been there'? She is extremely unlikely to have Eejay and well you know it!
Kate was never trying to fool anyone, she was merely expressing views in exactly the way teenagers do so she could be identified with by those very teenagers - she has an audience to keep identifying with and a radio show to keep up.
Adults are not supposed to be fooled by her remarks.
”

1 - The comments were not made tongue in cheek. She was serious ..... and making the same remarks over and over again. She knew that she was not addressing a kiddie audience. Now she is back tracking... probably because the producers at RI:SE and her agent told her that she was in danger of developing an image of being a cheap slut.. not suitable for daytime telly !

2 - Kate is sufficiently experienced to know what the media will do with the contents of interviews like that. Kate was sending signals to Ray ! She has used the media like this in the past to send messages to Alex, Duncan and more recently Spencer. Having used the media to make her feelings towards Ray as clear as crystal.... she proceeds to invite him round for dinner ...Ho Ho Ho !

3 - Kate's past must also be taken into account.

Did she ? Probably !

If not, it's because Ray did not want to !
Last edited by EddyBee : 09-08-2003 at 20:21
EddyBee
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
Its fair enough, in my opinion, for her to deny it if she sha***d him. Its nobodies business but theirs.

And at least he's an improvement on the ghastly Duncan James.
”

darling
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Candice
I had the same opinion as Eejay, didn't see you requote him so your reply could have easily applied to me and I had a different take to you.
Pardon me for not grasping it had become a private discussion on an open forum.
”

It was immediately below Eejay's post. If I'd wanted to reply to you I would have quoted you - since your post wasn't immediately above mine.

It wasn't a private conversation but I do object to your assumption that I was replying to you - especially since you then took offence at it!
darling
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
”

Candice
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by darling
It was immediately below Eejay's post. If I'd wanted to reply to you I would have quoted you - since your post wasn't immediately above mine.

It wasn't a private conversation but I do object to your assumption that I was replying to you - especially since you then take offence at it!
”

Generally I don't take much notice of the location of posts.

I didn't assume that you were replying specifically to me, I don't believe I said that. I thought it was aimed towards anyone hence why I responded. I was not offended by your first post - so you are wrong in your assumption, perhaps if I was I would have used a mad face like you did. Like I said I had a different take to you and I answered your points.

I was quite surprised at your 'mad' face but that's up to you darling.
EddyBee
09-08-2003
Candice & Darling ........... you are both such good mates of mine, so I hate to see you fall out. Please just let this go.
Candice
09-08-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Eejay
Candice & Darling ........... you are both such good mates of mine, so I hate to see you fall out. Please just let this go. ”

OK Eejay, it's leaving a nasty taste in my mouth and I think it's a genuine misunderstanding
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map