|
||||||||
advice? Panasonic TH-42PZ700 or Pioneer PDP-428XD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: South Devon/London
Posts: 963
|
advice? Panasonic TH-42PZ700 or Pioneer PDP-428XD
Ok guys, i need some advice. My current fat 32" tv has just blown so i need a new flat screen. I've narrowed it down to these two, can anyone give me their recommendations on which is the best one or which one they would buy. Also, which shops/stores would you purchase them from?
Thanks for your help. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
Ok guys, i need some advice. My current fat 32" tv has just blown so i need a new flat screen. I've narrowed it down to these two, can anyone give me their recommendations on which is the best one or which one they would buy. Also, which shops/stores would you purchase them from?
So I would suggest the Panasonic, who are a MUCH higher rated manufacturer in any case. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 16,680
|
We have a Panasonic and it is excellent with Sky HD.
When this began last year the Pioneer was creating reports of HDMI problems and for months there was a mammoth thread on AV Forums about this issue (still there, I think, if you look). It effected Pioneer far more than other sets. This may have been fixed by now, but check it out if Sky HD is to be used as people were forced to use component inputs whilst Sky and Pioneer argued over who was to blame. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ireland
Posts: 601
|
I've got the older PDP-427XD and am very happy with it. It's an excellent set and even got "Home Cinema Choice" best buy. http://www.homecinemachoice.com/cgi-...?reviewid=6994 I think you won't go wrong with either choice though. Pioneer and Panasonic are both the leaders in plasma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: South Devon/London
Posts: 963
|
what do people think is more important? resolution or contrast. The panasonic has a 5000:1 contrast whereas the panasonic has a 16000:1. The panasonic has a better resolution though.....decisions....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
what do people think is more important? resolution or contrast. The panasonic has a 5000:1 contrast whereas the panasonic has a 16000:1. The panasonic has a better resolution though.....decisions....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 631
|
reviews are saying the 8th generation pioneers are the best flat screen TVs ever.
I have always liked the pioneers too |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: South Devon/London
Posts: 963
|
oops sorry nigel. the pioneer has a 16000:1 and the panasonic a 5000:1 contrast ratio. From the few reviews i've read it says that the pioneer is better at SD broadcasts compared to the panasonic.....so now i'm veering towards teh pioneer. The only problem is if i'm spending that sorta money i kinda think i should be gettin a 1080 full hd set, just for futureproofness....hmmmm.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14.

