Sony Bravia at Woolworths ?? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Services: BT Vision, BT Broadband, BT HomeHub 3, Motorola Xoom, XBOX 360, SGII
Posts: 3,668
|
Sony Bravia at Woolworths ??
Sorry if already discussed, I saw an advert outside my local woolies at the weekend advertising a 32" Sony Bravia HDTV for £399.99!!
Anyone else see this, must be a catch? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
What model?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Services: BT Vision, BT Broadband, BT HomeHub 3, Motorola Xoom, XBOX 360, SGII
Posts: 3,668
|
http://www.woolworths.co.uk/web/jsp/...p?pid=50783016
Looks like they all sold out, I went yesterday and the sign was removed, too late :-( |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moon Base Alpha
Services: Samsung Sky+HD 2mix+ESPN TvLink Sony40NX713 PS3(320gb) HtcSensationXE
Posts: 386
|
Bravia KDL32U2001U for £400! Bargain... shame they're all gone
Only catch I could see is you'd have to be happy with having a silver telly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 12 Grimmauld Place
Services: At the Ironing Board
Posts: 575
|
I phoned my local store and they said that they can be ordered from the store but they go back up in price on Monday, if anyone is interested, so I would try ordering through the store
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,386
|
Back in stock but now £479.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Services: BT Vision, BT Broadband, BT HomeHub 3, Motorola Xoom, XBOX 360, SGII
Posts: 3,668
|
Suppose it's only another £80, is this TV worth it then??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,812
|
Better than MOST of the cheap sets, but at £480 for a 32" TV i'd rather go for the Tosh 32C3030DB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Midlands, England
Services: Virgin Media TV & BB
Posts: 2,746
|
Go for a Phillips. In my experience, they handle the none-HD better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,812
|
Quote:
You ARE joking, right? Philips (NOT Phillips) have the worst reliabilty record of ANY manufacturer out there. The picture quality is no better than a well calibrated Panasonic or similar. Wouldn't touch one with a bargepole... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
Philips Ambilight screens with the Pixel Plus processing are certainly top notch quality.
Use your own eyes to judge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,812
|
Shame the firmware is bug ridden and the hardware is so unreliable, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
Quote:
And HDTV test quotes: "Watching the Philips 42PF9831D side by side with our resident Panasonic PH9 and Sharp XD1E, we can say that the Philips is a strong performer at higher colour temperatures from D65. The Philips gives an above average performance for SD freeview (with Pixel Plus 3 on), fast action sports and HD movies. Despite of our reservations in the Picture Quality department, the Philips 42PF9831D is an impressive set on its own terms and is a welcome addition to any modern household." Pioneer has reliability issues with cloudy screens, Panasonic has purple snake issues, Samsung has firmware problems, Sony has ghosting and tearing problems. In fact, name me a manufacturer that hasn't had problems, it happens with products of this nature. Not saying I would buy a Philips, but I wouldn't class all of them as unreliable and bug ridden. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,812
|
I'm not disputing that every manufacturer has issues of some kind.
Just Philips and Samsung seem to have a lot more than everyone else! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,447
|
I'd say that was accurate, Philips do seem to have a knack of releasing fairly poor screens (compared to the Japanese and Koreans) and the lower end scrrens seem to be plagued with reliability issues.
Samsung are the largest global supplier of TVs in the world now though (based on revenue) so there are bound to be far more problems with them due to them being the size they are, but the M87 firmware issues are well known (that is what put me off buying one, opting for the Toshiba 42X instead) I'd go for a SharpLC-42XD1E for watching SD (due to the 100Hz) or wait for the Toshiba 42Z and Sony series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,812
|
The Sharp's seem to have a really poor HD picture, which is surprising considering they're about the best for SD!
I'd never buy a Samsung or Philips though, you're just asking for trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moon Base Alpha
Services: Samsung Sky+HD 2mix+ESPN TvLink Sony40NX713 PS3(320gb) HtcSensationXE
Posts: 386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: "Not so great" Yarmouth!
Posts: 27
|
If only Woolworths still existed as a "brick and mortar" store instead of only as an online store! It would have been interesting to see what good offers they would have had on Freeview HD equipment in their stores. Yes, I know on their online store, they sell Freeview HD equipment, but it would have been rather interesting to see the offers on Freeview HD equipment in their "brick and mortar" stores vs the offers on Freeview HD equipment on their online store.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 671
|
Zombie thread time! Yeah, er, thanks for resurrecting this one after five years(!)
Quote:
So speculating about what they might have done in 2012 is really just fantasy. Quote:
It's meaningless to talk about "they" (the present-day online "woolworths.co.uk") as if they're the same company as- or even have any connection with- the old Woolworths. They're not. The only thing they have in common is the name which the new owners bought for its recognition value and slapped on their own website. "They" (the new owners) never owned the old Woolies stores, (*) and we can assume have no intention of opening any. (*) The parent of the "new" woolworths.co.uk is actually descended from the owner of the former Littlewoods stores... and *they're* all closed too! |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55.



