I'm still unsure on Kelsey!

may be because she was the one that introduced the new girl to SJ.
in the new show, I reckon the new girl will introduce, the new lad that replaces Kelsey to SJ, in process this will give new viewers just enough back story to enjoy the show. that's my take anyway.

As much as I know it's going to be absolute rubbish. I'll probably be watching it anyway

Why watch it if you think it is going to be rubbish?

I enjoyed watching the pilot again, shame the EPG data on my sky plus was totally wrong. I'm looking forward to this afternoons story.

Anyone see SJ on BBC Breakfast this morning?

Remembered to set my video this morning, which is a bonus!

I'll be watching today's episode and see if it is worth carrying on watching next week before setting a timer for it.

If you're talking about the description of the episode, that was wrong everywhere including the BBC's own listings page!

Whoever created the original description must have got mixed up when they were told it was the first episode being shown on Sunday and didn't realise there'd been a pilot.

it was ok but it wasn't great. I think i'll delete it from my Toppy.

It was Ok...Hope it gets better!

according to DWM, Kelsey was dropped because they thought the boy-girl balance was uneven. however thats a load of b*llocks!!!

Second episode better than the first (more jokes). I'd give it 6/10. My kids, however, loved it. Which is, I guess, who it's aimed for...

K

And the third episode is better than the first two combined!

Some seriously creepy stuff in there. Worthy of Doctor Who itself.

Though the nunnery did look rather like Wayne Manor from the Tim Burton Batman films.

with you there Fizz. the third episode is well scripted and paced. great clifhanger..worthy of classic Who!

I'll third that opinion, gets a high 8 or even a 9 out of 10 from me.

Thoroughly enjoyed epi 3! Creepy!

Creepy and good. I thought I caught a glimps of Jean Marsh playing the old foggie (in the quick preview last week) but it wasn't.

Is each story going to be a two parter in this series? Just like old times

Better story than most of series 3 of the real thing.

If they keep this up the penny will drop that you can have Dr Who stories without the doctor or without a male lead - just as long as you don't get the stories.concept, setting and cast wrong and call it Torchwood.

Ahhh, it's been bugging me who the head nun was played by.

Just realised it was Suze from Gimme Gimme Gimme.

This episode was creepy. Just what kids ned to see at 5.30!

For a children's programe the episode had quite a lot of tension which surprised me.

And when I heard "Sontarans" my heart gave a little beat!.

Not sure what budget the have for this series, but if it is not as much as TW they are certainly spending it well!
Pitched just right, my daughter (5) was more scared of this episode than anything on DW yet! I'm enjoying it too!

[quote=Black Guardian;18413365]with you there Fizz. the third episode is well scripted and paced. great clifhanger..worthy of classic Who![/QUOTE]

I agree,infact I thought the start of ep 3 was darker than any of the new who stories,even the music score seemed more menacing which really helped build up the tension.Overall great!

I'm glad I was sitting down when I read that, BG giving praise? Hold the front page! I do agree though, and although I really shouldn't be watching this program (but it's Sarah Jane, innit...) it is totally enjoyable - episode three especially so...

why the shock twinkle? I always praise the actors, writers and directors..when it is deserved...