Has Topfield already built in obsolescence into the new TF5810?
It strikes me that the Topfield PVR's main strength is in its customizable nature (i.e. user-written applications or TAPs). With the recent channel changes, and new channels coming onboard, it is ridiculous that the current and new models (not yet released) don't have built-in WiFi so that applications and data can be easily updated.
It is such a pain searching around for updated channel logos, new versions of TAPs etc etc. With built-in WiFi, TAPs could be written to automatically download new logos or even update themselves with new versions.
I guess there might be expensive and convoluted ways of adding WiFi, but this is not really satisfactory. If this feature were instantly accessible then we'd see TAP writers considering internet access as a standard process, rather than a complicated bolt-on. Just imagine MyStuff updating its logos automatically or applications downloading extra programme or actor information from the Internet. Science fiction? No - the technology exists today - it's cheap and readily available.
Shirley the new model should have addressed this issue, especially considering that it is going to be quite pricey compared to other PVRs. Heck - they're adding WiFi to everything these days, anyway. Why should the Toppy be different?
In this WiFi-enabled age, hasn't Topfield missed a golden opportunity and lost the plot? Or is it planning another WiFi-enabled model in a year's time after everyone has shelled out for the TF5810? Would that be ethical?
It strikes me that the Topfield PVR's main strength is in its customizable nature (i.e. user-written applications or TAPs). With the recent channel changes, and new channels coming onboard, it is ridiculous that the current and new models (not yet released) don't have built-in WiFi so that applications and data can be easily updated.
It is such a pain searching around for updated channel logos, new versions of TAPs etc etc. With built-in WiFi, TAPs could be written to automatically download new logos or even update themselves with new versions.
I guess there might be expensive and convoluted ways of adding WiFi, but this is not really satisfactory. If this feature were instantly accessible then we'd see TAP writers considering internet access as a standard process, rather than a complicated bolt-on. Just imagine MyStuff updating its logos automatically or applications downloading extra programme or actor information from the Internet. Science fiction? No - the technology exists today - it's cheap and readily available.
Shirley the new model should have addressed this issue, especially considering that it is going to be quite pricey compared to other PVRs. Heck - they're adding WiFi to everything these days, anyway. Why should the Toppy be different?
In this WiFi-enabled age, hasn't Topfield missed a golden opportunity and lost the plot? Or is it planning another WiFi-enabled model in a year's time after everyone has shelled out for the TF5810? Would that be ethical?




