Originally Posted by simoncapewell:
“A serious omission would be the inability to watch a programme that was recording (hang your head in shame, v1.0 of the Humax 9200 firmware). Without wireless it functions as a PVR quite happily. With it, a few people wouldn't have to lug it to within 5m of their PC to update their TAPs once in a blue moon, and a few more would discover the tedium of turning TV into DVDs (hmmm haaah, illegal?). Since there's no mechanism for a TAP to pull information in over USB or network connection, even on the TF6000, having a permanent connection to a router isn't going to bring anything to the party. You must have a PC, NSLU2 or Asus WL500 deluxe with some custom software on it to push the data across.”
“A serious omission would be the inability to watch a programme that was recording (hang your head in shame, v1.0 of the Humax 9200 firmware). Without wireless it functions as a PVR quite happily. With it, a few people wouldn't have to lug it to within 5m of their PC to update their TAPs once in a blue moon, and a few more would discover the tedium of turning TV into DVDs (hmmm haaah, illegal?). Since there's no mechanism for a TAP to pull information in over USB or network connection, even on the TF6000, having a permanent connection to a router isn't going to bring anything to the party. You must have a PC, NSLU2 or Asus WL500 deluxe with some custom software on it to push the data across.”
OK - so I've won the "is WiFi appropriate" argument and now we're onto challenging the semantics of the thread title.
Having dabbled with another STB which has WiFi access, I know that (even having to run software on another PC) the ease of operation far outweighs any disadvantages.



