|
||||||||
SPOILER - Round 2 bottom 2 couples |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#376 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...2#post18670032
Please visit the above proposal and comment on the longstanding problem of unrepresentative voting results. |
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#377 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Anton's Arms
Posts: 342
|
Have any of you just listened to yourselves ,I thought the programme was called Strictly Come Dancing NOT
Strictly Tear Kate and Anton apart ! I for one thought Kate danced very well considering how little training she had and Arlene and Craigs insults were unbelieveably cruel. As for sympathy voting -what rubbish . |
|
|
|
|
|
#378 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,636
|
Quote:
So if the judges give bad marks we criticise them. And if the judges give good marks we criticise them.
What are we suggesting the judges should have done? It may also have been best if honesty had prevailed and the extent of the injury made clear . I think she looked very unsteady , stepped gingerly and danced poorly . I felt very sorry for her and admired her effort , but I would never have voted for her . That may well have been down to lack of practice , but tendonitis is truly horrid , excessively painful and will not clear up quickly. Now she will have to dance next week or we have another 2 person final ; that being the case if the outcome is similar to this week , more " sympathy" voting takes place and someone else with more chance of progressing goes . Sorry waltzingmatilda , sympathy voting does happen , you can look at every series and see that clearly . |
|
|
|
|
|
#379 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
|
[quote=SCD-Observer;18663362] I can see there are a lot of Anton's (and Kate's?) fans voting like mad to keep them in...
QUOTE] Nope; I'm a complete Anton fan and voted for Stephanie & Vincent. Much as I love Anton I would hate to see Kate risk permanent damage to herself. 2008 will be the Don of the Dancefloor's year!! xxx |
|
|
|
|
|
#380 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
So if the judges give bad marks we criticise them. And if the judges give good marks we criticise them.
What are we suggesting the judges should have done? |
|
|
|
|
|
#381 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,978
|
Im going to look on the brightside of this and so yes i did like stephanie and vincent but now that their out we can see alot more of vincent on it takes two hopefully with louisa!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#382 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Moscow
Posts: 1,081
|
Quote:
Now she will have to dance next week or we have another 2 person final ; that being the case if the outcome is similar to this week , more " sympathy" voting takes place and someone else with more chance of progressing goes . |
|
|
|
|
|
#383 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,826
|
Tonight we will see if we agree that Letitia showed more potential than Stephanie. It is possible you know!
I thought Stephanie was wonderful. To me, the travesty of justice is that she was in the bottom 2. I thought it would be Kate and Letitia, and that Kate would go. I suppose we, the voting (or not) public are the ones to blame. (just going to check that this is the correct thread before I post it! <blush> Yes, it is the spoiler thread) |
|
|
|
|
|
#384 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Yes indeed Little_Me, it was the sin of omission not commission what done Stephanie in. The following thread
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...0032contained: one suggestion that SCD voting should be for eviction not retention, and a suggestion that the vote should be the nett difference between Retention Total and Eviction Total. |
|
|
|
#385 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
Tonight we will see if we agree that Letitia showed more potential than Stephanie. It is possible you know!
I thought Stephanie was wonderful. To me, the travesty of justice is that she was in the bottom 2. I thought it would be Kate and Letitia, and that Kate would go. I suppose we, the voting (or not) public are the ones to blame. (just going to check that this is the correct thread before I post it! <blush> Yes, it is the spoiler thread) ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#386 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
Yes indeed Little_Me, it was the sin of omission not commission what done Stephanie in. The following thread
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s...0032contained: one suggestion that SCD voting should be for eviction not retention, and a suggestion that the vote should be the nett difference between Retention Total and Eviction Total.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23.




