|
||||||||
The end of strictly as BBC shoots... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,008
|
Mr T says:
I pity the fool who can't stop posting spoilers! Back on the actual topic - the Sunday results show doesn't bother me as such because I always look at the results beforehand if they're available. I don't get all this grand deception talk either since it is very common practice for broadcasters to record shows as live which go out a day or two later. Friday night with JR pretends it's Friday when it's not - do people get irate about this too? I think I'd be more concerned actually if it was shown live today as waiting for 24hrs for the result would be rather torturous once you get to the crazily involved stages later in the series. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 68,698
|
Quote:
And if the result is unexpected, as it was last night, it's going to be impossible to contain the leaks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 7,647
|
Quote:
Consider this for scenario.
The public is so upset by voting system changes that they deliberately set out to make things difficult for the Judges/BBC. If they persist, I fear that this will continue. BTW I didn't vote at all. Quote:
Mr T says:
I pity the fool who can't stop posting spoilers! I sympathise. I don't mind knowing the results but it's a shame people can't keep the comments about who has gone to one spoiler thread. It's a selfish attitude towards those who don't want to know in advance.Quote:
Back on the actual topic - the Sunday results show doesn't bother me as such because I always look at the results beforehand if they're available. I don't get all this grand deception talk either since it is very common practice for broadcasters to record shows as live which go out a day or two later. Friday night with JR pretends it's Friday when it's not - do people get irate about this too?
My thoughts exactly. There hasn't been any pretence at it being a live show on Sunday. They simply say it's Sunday night. If people have assumed it's live then that's not actually the BBC's fault.Quote:
I think I'd be more concerned actually if it was shown live today as waiting for 24hrs for the result would be rather torturous once you get to the crazily involved stages later in the series.
Good point. Also, being realistic about it, they're simply not going to drag all the performers back for a live Sunday night show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 885
|
I'm glad the judges have the final say now. Look at Series 1 when Chris Parker actually made it to the final! If he had won, in my view there would have been no point in having any more Strictly series. It would have been a joke, since the man couldn't dance and didn't take it seriously.
Then we had the series when Darren Gough won purely because of his devoted fan base, robbing Colin Jackson of what should have been his title. The final in that series ought to have been between Colin and Zoe - Darren shouldn't even have made it that far. Last year I was pleased Karen won but I wasn't sure the result would have been the same had Emma Bunton gone through. At least this way the public and the judges share limited power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 744
|
If the GBP vote to keep someone in that they find entertaining then all the dance experts complain that it's a "dance competition." When the judges get more clout, then the cry changes to "it's entertainment." You are just so not going to please all of the people all of the time.
But what the majority of us do seem to agree on is the sheer stupidity of the Sunday show. I actually found myself getting angry last night that I wasn't going to be able to see the results show later in the evening. It has really spoiled my enjoyment of SCD as I enjoyed SCD on Saturday's, and now it's like watching half a show --there's something missing. And watching the results on Sunday (when I already know the result) it's just lame. Does anyone know what the ratings were for last Sunday's show? The Saturday night show ratings were published but I didn't see anything about Sunday's. It would be interesting to know and also to see if the ratings for the Sunday show rise, fall or stay consistent. If they fall then it bodes well for next year! |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
Back on the actual topic - the Sunday results show doesn't bother me as such because I always look at the results beforehand if they're available. I don't get all this grand deception talk either since it is very common practice for broadcasters to record shows as live which go out a day or two later. Friday night with JR pretends it's Friday when it's not - do people get irate about this too? I think I'd be more concerned actually if it was shown live today as waiting for 24hrs for the result would be rather torturous once you get to the crazily involved stages later in the series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
Quote:
Does anyone know what the ratings were for last Sunday's show? The Saturday night show ratings were published but I didn't see anything about Sunday's. It would be interesting to know and also to see if the ratings for the Sunday show rise, fall or stay consistent. If they fall then it bodes well for next year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,212
|
I'm more annoyed by the Sunday thing than anything else, but I agree about the changes to the voting/elimination sucking big monkeys balls
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sofas are deities
Posts: 16,123
|
Quote:
If the results leak every week (as they no doubt will) I can imagine the ratings for the Sunday show starting to fall. If people already know the result they may be less inclined to tune in.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,396
|
Quote:
The judges vote is to restore order after the public voting last year where the two strongest dancers didn't make the last two and strong people lincluding Carole and Spoony went much too early. The voting has always thrown up some underdogs who should have gone and some good people who don't get rewarded but until last year they didn't lose so many good people early or end up with two weak finalists. it also gives them a chance to resist the usual pro-male, pro under-dog , anti-judge, pro sportsmen and anti ethnic minority voting bias. The judges in 2006 ended up looking ridiculous as they marked to try and counter the voting (which backfired) and the show ended up with a final two who were only any good at half the dances. Rather than have another series with incredible results that had little to do with dancing, bizarre marking as the judges responded and results that ignored the judges and made them look ridiculous, I imagine someone in the BBC decided on the change or the judges demanded it. (We know all of this because two of the judges have told us when asked by Claudia)
The second show is y there to fill more airtime with little extra cost. If people like the show they are now getting more of it - the price is its largely filler and the suspense has gone. If they wanted to make the judges decision really fair they should have brought in another judge so Len wouldnt need to have casting vote, because that means in effect he chooses who goes, and that judge should have been a dancer with judging experience of both types of dancing. I dont have a problem with the results being a day later except that it is filmed in front of an audience on Saturday and that leads to the obvious leaking of the results and less people voting, so less money for CIN. Also the childish fighting with X factor is really tiresome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: pimple on the bum of back end
Posts: 18,770
|
Quote:
I'm glad the judges have the final say now. Look at Series 1 when Chris Parker actually made it to the final! If he had won, in my view there would have been no point in having any more Strictly series. It would have been a joke, since the man couldn't dance and didn't take it seriously.
Then we had the series when Darren Gough won purely because of his devoted fan base, robbing Colin Jackson of what should have been his title. The final in that series ought to have been between Colin and Zoe - Darren shouldn't even have made it that far. Last year I was pleased Karen won but I wasn't sure the result would have been the same had Emma Bunton gone through. At least this way the public and the judges share limited power. At the end of the show, they may just as well say to Len - righti-ho matey - who do you want to go? and save the charade! I have to say that I think the winners for each series would always have won regardless of this method of eviction. The audience take a certain pleasure in keeping the entertaining ones in, but when push comes to shove the winners are generally worthy winners - either through the <braces self> 'journey' (there, said it ) they have had - like Darren Gough and Mark (who would have beaten anyone in the final last year) or Jill and Natasha. Most of the people I know find the joy of the programme is taking someone who can't dance and turning them into someone who can - rather than taking someone who is already half way decent and just polishing them up a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 227
|
Quote:
Why have viewers vote for their choice then give Arlene and co the say on who stays and who goes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: portsmouth
Posts: 475
|
i think the o/p's is correct if for example last week i had voted for caborn & not k logan & if caborn had been second bottom overall then i have wasted my money on a vote. as judges at the 2nd bite booted him off sorry but i wont be voting again as its a rip off.
i would also like to point out that this new result show loses children in need between 22/24 hours of voting revenue as lines are closed from 9pm saturday. WELL DONE BBC |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,055
|
Der Chef says
I propose a slight change to the format ![]() As its quite clear its Alesha, Penny and Kelly ear marked for the final The other female celebs should be thrown out every other week ![]() and the Male Celebs are relegated to doing a highly entertaining group dance EVERY WEEK ![]() ![]() ![]() Ohhh Yeah
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I agree, this is the worst ever and its all because of the new format, its ruined it for me.
Judges getting more power too, its all wrong I am not liking it at all. bring back the old format, the much better one. or this will be the end. I will not vote anymore
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 142
|
Unless there's a dramatic turnaround by the faceless gits in suits at the BBC, Come Dancing is most definitely dead and buried for me, and I hope the rest of the audience agree.
I had to drive like a maniac to get back in time for the results show, and after watching it, I'm wondering why I bothered - watching an echo of what happened last night just doesn't cut it. It'll limp out another series to dwindling viewers and then begin to die a long and miserable death. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,067
|
Quote:
Back on the actual topic - the Sunday results show doesn't bother me as such because I always look at the results beforehand if they're available. I don't get all this grand deception talk either since it is very common practice for broadcasters to record shows as live which go out a day or two later. Friday night with JR pretends it's Friday when it's not - do people get irate about this too? But for a results show to be shown 22 hours after the result is known is just ridiculous. I have to completely avoid this forum for all of Sunday because I know I will accidentally find the answer otherwise. I want to view the results show in ignorance of the result. Otherwise, why watch? Okay you've got lots of nice dancing but the main focus for me is to find out who went. I noticed tonight it seems they are showing Robin Hood twice - in a slot which could be occupied by SCD results on Saturday, and then again before the SCD Sunday Show. How on earth can they justify this. ![]() As for the judges vote... as Arlene pointed out, it made no difference this week, the judges all obviously wanted Kate out but the public prevented them firing her. I originally thought the judges having the final say was a good thing, but I am rapidly changing my mind. As others have said, it not just about dance, it is about entertainment. Julian Clary would never have got past the judges in this format. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 788
|
Quote:
Der Chef says
I propose a slight change to the format ![]() As its quite clear its Alesha, Penny and Kelly ear marked for the final The other female celebs should be thrown out every other week ![]() and the Male Celebs are relegated to doing a highly entertaining group dance EVERY WEEK ![]() ![]() ![]() Ohhh Yeah ![]() To steal your Duffman catchphrase...Oh Yeah!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,785
|
Quote:
Mr T says:
I pity the fool who can't stop posting spoilers! ![]() May have missed this but what have the mods said about putting a 'sticky' about spoilers in this forum like they have in Cult? o/t they should have Mr T. on DWTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,431
|
Apart from the utter stupidity of moving the results show to Sunday night instead of having it after Casualty (as in previous years).
I think it is a good idea for the judges to decide who should be eliminated out of the bottom 2, but with one amendment....... In event of a 2-2 tie, Len should NOT have the casting vote. In this instance it should go back to the public vote, and the couple that received the least number of votes from the great British public is out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,055
|
Quote:
In this instance it should go back to the public vote, and the couple that received the least number of votes from the great British public is out. Agrees Ohh Yeah
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 924
|
Quote:
Unless there's a dramatic turnaround by the faceless gits in suits at the BBC, Come Dancing is most definitely dead and buried for me, and I hope the rest of the audience agree.
I had to drive like a maniac to get back in time for the results show, and after watching it, I'm wondering why I bothered - watching an echo of what happened last night just doesn't cut it. It'll limp out another series to dwindling viewers and then begin to die a long and miserable death. There's nothing quite like a little bit of over-reaction! |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Propping up Bar Cutler
Posts: 2,323
|
Quote:
Der Chef says
I propose a slight change to the format ![]() As its quite clear its Alesha, Penny and Kelly ear marked for the final The other female celebs should be thrown out every other week ![]() and the Male Celebs are relegated to doing a highly entertaining group dance EVERY WEEK ![]() ![]() ![]() Ohhh Yeah ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 104,946
|
I predict catastrophic ratings for the Sunday show when Emmerdale and Corrie get back to occupying the 7-8 slot. People will probably turn to the internet to find out the results. I would also venture to say that many (though not all, of course!) viewers who watch SCD are the same as those who watch ITV on a Sunday night. I'm sure we'll be back to a live Saturday results show before the end of the run, and the BBC saying it was never planned for the results show to be on Sundays throughout the run
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 296
|
Quote:
Am I the only person who's perfectly happy for the results show to be on Sunday and be recorded?
Waynebird |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23.




I sympathise. I don't mind knowing the results but it's a shame people can't keep the comments about who has gone to one spoiler thread. It's a selfish attitude towards those who don't want to know in advance.
Good point.
.
) they have had - like Darren Gough and Mark (who would have beaten anyone in the final last year) or Jill and Natasha. Most of the people I know find the joy of the programme is taking someone who can't dance and turning them into someone who can - rather than taking someone who is already half way decent and just polishing them up a bit.
