I like both about equally. Both have their foibles and advantages.
Pip is a far better presenter than the dreadful Brucie IMHO, but I really wish he'd drop the shouting. Holly & Tess are literally interchangeable.
Strictly makes much better use of its pros whereas they hardly get a word in on DOI.
ITT really enhances Strictly for me whereas DOI is crying out for a
decent companion show. NOT some knockabout /attention span of a gnat/ slapstick/ yoof orientated rubbish like the late, non-lamented Defrosted! Instead we need proper, in depth insider stuff, not only straight training footage but maybe things like the pro's showing us in detail how various moves are supposed to work, how they teach them to their celebs etc. Then we can get a better insight into what to look for on the Sunday Night. I've learned loads about various dances and their integral moves from SD and ITT - and love to sit there appreciating a great Fleckel or whatever when watching Strictly. Wouldn't it be great to do the same about Ice Dancing?
I hope that the sucess of Jayne's opening dances with the Pros during Chris' injury will convince the ITV producers to keep including them right through. The Pro dances are always good fun on Strictly.
I've never had any problems or been distracted by the backing music in DOI, and agree pre-recorded is appropriate for ice dance. In contrast, the live band in Strictly have often had me screaming at the telly for butchering something or other which is a huge distraction from the actual dancing.
On the whole, I think the costumes etc are better on Strictly. On DOI I think they tend to be a bit tacky/garish, and on more than one occasion so badly made I find myself wondering if they'll fall apart before the end of the routine. Whoever did the make up for last Sunday's show should be shot.
I hate the SD "Sunday" results show. Well done ITV for not following suit on a ratings hunt.
The ads on DOI are a real pain. I appreciate they're a necessity but do they really have to cram in so many, so often ...?
As a non soap-watcher, there are always loads of contestants I've never heard of on both shows. But actually, I quite like that, and enjoy "getting to know them" through the series. It also tends to avoid me having (often mis-placed) pre-conceptions about people and their abilities too. As a big rugby fan, I just knew Austin Healy was an egoistcal pain the the arse and a large part of me really wanted to see him make a right prat of himself .... but of course he turned out to be really quite talented, and much more personable than I'd thought and I finished up voting for him!
I agree too often the judges on SD pick favourites and reflect it in their scores. That's less of a problem on DOI. But there Jason is just too OTT in his comments sometimes and I don't get what Ruthie's there for at all. I'd much rather hear the more considered, and in my view, more relevent comments, and constructive criticism of Karen, Nicky and Robin
I do think Strictly offers a more level playing field. A week female skater can get through for weeks based on being pulled around and lifted by her partner, whereas there's nowhere to hide for the men.
Finally, I hate, loathe and detest the flying in the DOI final.
Gosh, reading back that seems like a long list of gripes, and a long old post too, sorry

But bottom line is, whatever their various shortcomings, I love both shows and am delighted that they are not scheduled to overlap - I hate it when both are off air and I can't get my weekend fix of dancing one way or another