• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
ITT Monday 29 October 2007
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
arddunol
29-10-2007
What, you mean it isn't just Mark and Karen ?

Cally's mum
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by arddunol:
“What, you mean it isn't just Mark and Karen ?

”

You're obsessed, woman!

(Says she, who is not obsessed at all. Oh no. Not me. Never. Not a jot. Haven't set Sky+, two videos and called a friend to ensure theirs is also set .... )
SalsaFan
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by arddunol:
“What, you mean it isn't just Mark and Karen ?

”

I wish!

Dear BBC........
bearwatcher
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by Miah:
“Because they didn't get a winner's interview - which they deserve. Because they are popular with many of the viewing audience. But above all because it's MAREN TUESDAY again!

Besides, aren't Alesha and Tish on tomorrow as well? It's not as if all of ITT is going to be taken up by interviewing the reigning champs (more's the pity, frankly)...”



I agree that is a shame - there should be a winner's ITT

Dear BBC
mia75
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by SalsaFan:
“Do the words "current champions" mean anything to you? ”

I prefer 'Last Year's Winners'
It's a new series. They need to move on.

I'd prefer to see how this year's dancers were coping with their dances this week tbh
pickledgherkin
29-10-2007
I think it is good that Mark and Karen will be on. No-one is interviewed for very long on ITT and it will be good to hear what they have to say about this year's show. The show will still have plenty of current performances and practice, etc.

Claudia was good tonight.
SalsaFan
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by mia75:
“I prefer 'Last Year's Winners'
It's a new series. They need to move on.

I'd prefer to see how this year's dancers were coping with their dances this week tbh”

And I'd prefer that winner's interview we were denied last year!
bearwatcher
29-10-2007
Same here SF and little_ me
Tissy
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by beanbean:
“
Looking forward to Alesha/matt and Mark and KAren on tomorrow.”

Ohhhh Matts birthday too
Coronis
29-10-2007
Same here SF, Bear. Now, now we can't always get what we want. Double treat; Matt and Alesha on too. Happy Birthday to Mr. Cutler!
arddunol
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by mia75:
“I prefer 'Last Year's Winners'
It's a new series. They need to move on.

I'd prefer to see how this year's dancers were coping with their dances this week tbh”

I think this is the appearance held over from week 1 of ITT .
I think it may be recorded , but I hope not .

SCD needs to move on or Mark and Karen ,?

We will split the difference ...reigning champions is the correct phrase .

We don't see much of this week's training until mid week and I doubt Mark and Karen will be on long , you can go and make a cup of tea whilst they are talking .

Gazbo
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by little_me:
“I think it is good that Mark and Karen will be on. No-one is interviewed for very long on ITT and it will be good to hear what they have to say about this year's show.”

Unfortunately, Karen is on the BBC payroll now - she's unlikely to say anything controversial, everything will be lovely
Coronis
29-10-2007
Aren't they all (those still on the show) on the BBC payroll?
Romus
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by sjw8:
“OMG - Len furious saying the BBC put him in a position he didn't want to be put in Yet the judges have always said that they should have the final say between a good dancer and a bad dancer - sounds like they wanted their cake and eat it but it's bitten them in the b*m.

Interesting that Len said that he wasn't keen on the idea in the first place ”

I thought Len's ridiculous bleating about the judging methods was pitiful. Why didn't he do what Craig did, and vote for Gabby - then we would have retained a really good dancer and lost Penny, who isn't really up to much.
Romus
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by *Nikie*:
“I felt so sorry for Gabby, James and Len. Len was never keen on the idea and him, James and Gabby all paid the price.

I have much more respect for James now after that interview. He looked like he was about to cry again at the end of that interview.

Craig for once spoke sense and I think Brendan should be taken out of the competition. I'm annoyed for Craig blaming the public though... Why! If the other 3 loved Gabby so much they would have saved her wouldn't they derrrr!”

Surely if Brendan is taken "out of the competition" Kelly will have to be found another partner at short notice?
Romus
29-10-2007
Originally Posted by Lemon Lyman:
“I agree. Very very slow samba which made it easier for her to dance to.”

There was hardly any content in Penny's samba. All she did was prance or walk around the room rotating her hips. One of the judges even praised the routine

Her jive was also easy. I didn't see her do much fancy footwork in her quickstep either. It seems to be that all her routines are crafted to be technically easy and bland to suit her lack of dancing talent.

Then she stands in front of the judges and sees herself marked above those with superior talent. Absolutely ridiculous.

I have to add, to be fair, that Penny's carriage and movement (apart from her feet) during her quickstep were smooth and quite good, although the performance was not as light as some of the other dancers.



I also don't care to see her "height" used as an excuse for her abysmal performances. I'd like both her and the judges to shut up about this.

As for the legs - I think Leticia, Kelly and Alesha have got those nailed.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map