I have a moderately sized tattoo on my lower back (about 15cm by 5 ) but I do think there is a certain point on men and women where you have too many, too visible too often and that does not look good at all.
I don't think tattoos on legs ever look good on either sex but that is my opinion.

Is this a class thing?

'Cos I've read "Council Estate Girls" and "Middle Class Girls" bandied about.

Is there some snobbery on this Forum?

Are you all just a bunch of snobs?

Is that the reason you slag some celebs. off and not others?

Oh, she's working class so doesn't deserve fame and fortune, or, she thinks she's upper class but she's not really?

Heaven Forbid that that is the case, of course...LOL

I think it looks foul

Nope.

It just looks nasty.

I don't care what class she is, I don't care what tattoos she has...she's just vile

But the tattoos certainly don't help.

I think the thigh one looks awful. I read in an interview with her once that she really regrets that tattoo

I'm not surprised. It's not attractive, IMO.

I have several but can't say that hers are any great shakes.

It's where you put them and what you get that makes them look good or bad and, just as people with the same hair colour don't all share the same traits and attributes and all look the same, not everyone with tattoos is tarty etc. and not all tattoos look the same.

I'm not down on people because they don't have tattoos so I've never understand those that are down on people that do.