It's acceptable that the Queen is credited among those Glamorous Women, but Kate Moss??? I don't think she deserves the predicate. Even when it comes to the word glamor as what the magazine has described, "about how you wear something, not about what you wear," still Moss isn't the best choice i think. She's a mess in anyway

Dear old Queenie is a frump IMHO.

& whilst Stella McCartney designs nice clothes she usually looks like she's been dragged through a hedge backwards with unkempt hair and that sour expression.

As for Moss - great style but not glamorous.

Agree about Mirren though - she always looks great.

Oh no, I think Her Maj looks fine in what she wears. She can't be expected to be a fashion plate a la Mrs Beckham or wear outrageous fashions like Kate Moss. For a start, she's too old, and for another it wouldn't be becoming dignity wise.

Some may think she's frumpy, but for the job she does and for her age, what she wears is appropriate. Her shoes are a bit clumpy, but I'll bet with all the standing she has to do, they're comfortable as hell.

Ooo a new folder!

I'd agree; for her age, the Queen dresses elegantly and smart. At 81, she can't be expected to be flouncing around in high heels!!

As for Kate Moss, she may apparently be a 'trend-setter' but glamorous she ain't. She can't even be bothered to brush her hair most of the time.

Why is she still being nominated for these things? She needs a bloody good steam bath.

As far as the fashion world is concerned, Mossy can do no wrong.

She could go out clad in an old binliner and they'd still hail it as a triumph.

The Queen dresses very well. Better in this decade than in her middle age, I think. Maybe that's down to 70s and 80s fashion though.

She's made the matching hat and overcoat-type-thing set off with a brooch iconic.