|
||||||||
can anyone tell me why sharon never got to pick a replacment for emily? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,573
|
can anyone tell me why sharon never got to pick a replacment for emily?
i was really surprised they never replaced emily. it was still early in the show, so y not bring back one of the girls that jus missed the final 12?
was anything ever said about this? plus its a week less the xfactor will make money from phonecalls ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 52
|
I think that was the week they had planned a double elimination so they didn't want to bring anyone else in for that reason.
To be honest, Emily was never much cop anyway and it serves Sharon right for going with the sob stories instead of picking the best singers. Sharon will never win the X Factor whilst she continues to pick her acts using her heart and not her head. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waterloo Road Drama Classroom
Posts: 1,636
|
Emily was awful, she should have picked Steph, she was absolutely amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,843
|
Lowering the age limit was a terrible idea, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,391
|
Emily just dissapeared, she's never beem mentioned sinced. Being it was early on, I feel they could have replaced her, but with all the phone voting scandels, I guess they decided not to push things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
Lowering the age limit was a terrible idea, IMHO.
It's too much to cope with at that age (well, at older ages as well, but even more so at 14 or 15.) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:38.


