|
||||||||
I like Len but does his one-man standing ovation P anyone else off? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, or thereabouts
Posts: 1,437
|
I think a lot more people would've loved Matt's waltz if Len hadn't done a standing ovation/ got a perfect 40... people now concentrate on finding everything that was negative about the dance in order to disagree with the judges, whereas if he had got a 38 or so, people would've overlooked some of the faults but agree that overall it was a great dance (like with Alesha's and Gethin's). Shame that the judges' behaviour are taking it away from what was a great waltz.
![]() I thought it was rather sweet at the time but that's because I was stuck in this air of relief/pride/awe etc etc that my favourite had not only managed to get through the routine, but do a great one. Looking back though, it *is* a bit cringeworthy and I wish he hadn't done it. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19,412
|
Quote:
It's a bitter pill to swallow.
I loved Alesha's waltz. I loved Gethin's waltz. I didn't feel Matt's justified a 40 over and above theirs. I thought Matt did a fantastic job last night but i also thought Gethin and Aleshas waltz was lovely. I think the reason why Matt got the 40 and neither of them did was because he was the last one to perform it? And also because of the stage fright he suffered last week... Although i am interested to hear Craigs reasoning for giving his first 10 of the series..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,143
|
Quote:
I assume you are starting another rant thread. But I guess it's true everyone is entitled to their own opinion...
I for one thought their Waltz was PERFECT as far as a male celeb goes. I remembered Gethin's Waltz was near-excellent, except for some missed heel leads and I think it was the same with Alesha (and both Gethin and Alesha edged Matt a little in PERFORMING the Waltz), but I thought Matt held himself very well and didn't put a foot wrong. Only his facial expression on two occasions (I thought it was one but I realised he did it twice when watching the dance again): i.e. he stuck out his tongue to wet his lips (either because he was nervous or he's trying to remember what to do next). But I guess the judges was swept away by the romance they so completely portrayed in the Waltz... Bruno was more swept away by his come-back as he already said in his comments. Craig, I believe truly mark according to his criteria, music, choreography (performance) and technicalities... I think I am the only one who thinks Matt's Waltz deserved a perfect 40. I have an impression that even Matt's most dedicated fans beg to differ with my opinion... I don't mind being alone in this! For me his Waltz is on par with last year's AT by Mark and Karen: one dance which I will NEVER get sick of watching again and again... |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,073
|
Quote:
I thought it was rather sweet at the time but that's because I was stuck in this air of relief/pride/awe etc etc that my favourite had not only managed to get through the routine, but do a great one. Looking back though, it *is* a bit cringeworthy and I wish he hadn't done it.
A plaintiff and a defendant came up before him. The plaintiff made his case. Justice Len stood up and applauded, with the defendant still to speak. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, or thereabouts
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
I have to admit that t I was more impressed by Matt's waltz when I re-watched him doing it in the dance off. After its performance it was obvious that Matt thought that he had nailed it technically. Maybe his problems stem from a perfectionist streak. I recall earlier criticisms that he was concentrating too hard about what came next. I now think that the judges had nowhere else to go. They had already given very high scores to Gethin and Alesha who for me were better in the more subjective aspects of performance and extra chemistry. A mark or two should have been deducted but that would have resulted in him getting the same score as a technically inferior dance.
), while the other two had good performance but perhaps not as technically good. Maybe it'll make more sense if they had two scores out of 5, one for performance and one for technicality - but then it would never have the same impact as the "9! 8! 10! 10!" kind of scoring!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,068
|
Quote:
I think a lot more people would've loved Matt's waltz if Len hadn't done a standing ovation/ got a perfect 40... people now concentrate on finding everything that was negative about the dance in order to disagree with the judges, whereas if he had got a 38 or so, people would've overlooked some of the faults but agree that overall it was a great dance (like with Alesha's and Gethin's). Shame that the judges' behaviour are taking it away from what was a great waltz.
![]() I thought it was rather sweet at the time but that's because I was stuck in this air of relief/pride/awe etc etc that my favourite had not only managed to get through the routine, but do a great one. Looking back though, it *is* a bit cringeworthy and I wish he hadn't done it. To be honest, the marking has been so erratic this year that I've started to ignore it, whether or not Matt and Flavia deserved their 40, it was a lovely waltz. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, or thereabouts
Posts: 1,437
|
Quote:
I think this has happened several times in the series with various couples due to overmarking. I'm thinking particularly of Alesha's Cha Cha Cha, which I thought was an absolutely fabulous performance but seemed to start a backlash because she scored 39 for it. That night we also saw a brilliant salsa from Matt, but instead of raves for the great dancing that night the aftermath was dominated by rants about overmarking and favouritism, etc.
To be honest, the marking has been so erratic this year that I've started to ignore it, whether or not Matt and Flavia deserved their 40, it was a lovely waltz. Undermarking is always better than overmarking - with undermarking you tend to just complain lightly about the judges' stinginess, while overmarking backfires on the contestants for not having 'deserved' it, when it wasn't their fault. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
For me all 3 waltzes are on par.
I thought Matt did a fantastic job last night but i also thought Gethin and Aleshas waltz was lovely. I think the reason why Matt got the 40 and neither of them did was because he was the last one to perform it? And also because of the stage fright he suffered last week... Although i am interested to hear Craigs reasoning for giving his first 10 of the series.. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
I have to admit that t I was more impressed by Matt's waltz when I re-watched him doing it in the dance off. After its first performance it was obvious that Matt thought that he had nailed it technically. Maybe his problems stem from a perfectionist streak. I recall earlier criticisms that he was concentrating too hard about what came next. I now think that the judges had nowhere else to go. They had already given very high scores to Gethin and Alesha who for me were better in the more subjective aspects of performance and extra chemistry. A mark or two should have been deducted but that would have resulted in him getting the same score as a technically inferior dance.
But He *tried* harder at 'acting' the dance...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,079
|
Quote:
It was just pointless as far as the judging goes - it was purely an attempt at self promotion
Self Promotion - Len BADman. Spot on, Mate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,079
|
Quote:
I thought he stood up to re-arrange his pickled walnuts........?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Piddletrenthide
Posts: 104
|
I consider it very bad manners to whoever follows that exhibitionist gesture, knowing that favouritism has been declared. Enough to deflate any contestant, when you know that you are already toast in the dance-off before the main dances have finished.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,472
|
Quote:
I consider it very bad manners to whoever follows that exhibitionist gesture, knowing that favouritism has been declared. Enough to deflate any contestant, when you know that you are already toast in the dance-off before the main dances have finished.
And you could see it in Gethin's face - resigned - and Camilla's - gloomy. Matt and Flavia, meanwhile, just looked smug. The judges' ridiculous attempts to fall over each other to smother Matt with praise - exemplified by the four tens - has been embarrassing. It's undermined the credibility of Matt as a dancer, who was good when he first found his feet, then became very inconsistent. Then tonight Craig admits he's worried about Matt being able to do all five routines. So if Matt makes a mistake and looks crestfallen, what will the judges do then? Reward him with more tens? Or mark him down - cue the public rushing to his rescue and turning the entire series into a joke. I would really like to move on from this fiasco - but watching ITT tonight just mde the farce worse, with Arlene, Craig and Bruno trying to defend what happened (see the ITT thread). Doubtless Len BADman will be wheeled out to do similar at some point. :yawn: The BBC is probably thrilled that all this is generating so much press - they should be aware that it's seriously damaging a brand they supposedly value ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cuckoo Land
Posts: 16,461
|
Quote:
I assume you are starting another rant thread. But I guess it's true everyone is entitled to their own opinion...
I for one thought their Waltz was PERFECT as far as a male celeb goes. I remembered Gethin's Waltz was near-excellent, except for some missed heel leads and I think it was the same with Alesha (and both Gethin and Alesha edged Matt a little in PERFORMING the Waltz), but I thought Matt held himself very well and didn't put a foot wrong. Only his facial expression on two occasions (I thought it was one but I realised he did it twice when watching the dance again): i.e. he stuck out his tongue to wet his lips (either because he was nervous or he's trying to remember what to do next). But I guess the judges was swept away by the romance they so completely portrayed in the Waltz... Bruno was more swept away by his come-back as he already said in his comments. Craig, I believe truly mark according to his criteria, music, choreography (performance) and technicalities... I think I am the only one who thinks Matt's Waltz deserved a perfect 40. I have an impression that even Matt's most dedicated fans beg to differ with my opinion... I don't mind being alone in this! For me his Waltz is on par with last year's AT by Mark and Karen: one dance which I will NEVER get sick of watching again and again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
Ooh it does me 'ead in!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 592
|
I think Len made a bit of a fool of himself and was just attention seeking. Making a big point of saying "I'm going to do something I've never done before" and then proceeding to do something that he did last series which had got no less cringeworthy in the meantime. I bet Matt and Flavia were embarrassed.
I also agree with those who have said above that it was unfair on Gethin to have to follow it when the holder of the casting vote had made it very plain where his vote would be going. Unless he was going to do two standing ovations in one night?! |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Posts: 30,070
|
Noticed Len's absence on ITT tonight-why was that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, or thereabouts
Posts: 1,437
|
He hardly appears on ITT interviews apart from the masterclasses, if I recall correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
It was just pointless as far as the judging goes - it was purely an attempt at self promotion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 592
|
Len probably had an inkling that four 10s would be the score so had to come up with a way to make sure that his 10 was more noticeable than anyone else's. He loved the dance and gave it the maximum score, fair enough. Standing up only resulted in all eyes being on him when they should have been on Matt and Flavia.
In actual fact, Craig's 10 was the most noticeable because he has kept it in reserve until he saw something he really believed was as close as possible to being perfect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,467
|
They've even got a photo of Len's SO in the Gallery of this week's dances on the BBC website!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,242
|
Quote:
They've even got a photo of Len's SO in the Gallery of this week's dances on the BBC website!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,934
|
Quote:
it was like applauding him for REMEMBERING his steps - LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sportyland
Posts: 30,070
|
Quote:
He hardly appears on ITT interviews apart from the masterclasses, if I recall correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,467
|
Quote:
I thought the gallery is supposed to show the DANCERS, not judges! LOL!
![]() Maybe Len's after a part in EastEnders as Peggy's long lost lover from the Hammersmith Palais?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:20.





), while the other two had good performance but perhaps not as technically good. Maybe it'll make more sense if they had two scores out of 5, one for performance and one for technicality - but then it would never have the same impact as the "9! 8! 10! 10!" kind of scoring!
Ooh it does me 'ead in!!!!