I think a lot more people would've loved Matt's waltz if Len hadn't done a standing ovation/ got a perfect 40... people now concentrate on finding everything that was negative about the dance in order to disagree with the judges, whereas if he had got a 38 or so, people would've overlooked some of the faults but agree that overall it was a great dance (like with Alesha's and Gethin's). Shame that the judges' behaviour are taking it away from what was a great waltz. 
I thought it was rather sweet at the time but that's because I was stuck in this air of relief/pride/awe etc etc that my favourite had not only managed to get through the routine, but do a great one. Looking back though, it *is* a bit cringeworthy and I wish he hadn't done it.

I thought it was rather sweet at the time but that's because I was stuck in this air of relief/pride/awe etc etc that my favourite had not only managed to get through the routine, but do a great one. Looking back though, it *is* a bit cringeworthy and I wish he hadn't done it.




), while the other two had good performance but perhaps not as technically good. Maybe it'll make more sense if they had two scores out of 5, one for performance and one for technicality - but then it would never have the same impact as the "9! 8! 10! 10!" kind of scoring!
Ooh it does me 'ead in!!!!”