Oh goodie, cos I'd like to rant about the inconsistency of the Judges decision making and what the rules of the competition are:
I refer to Arlene and Craig this evening on ITT saying that they had to judge the Dance Off entirely based on those 2 particular performances.
So what about all the "so and so has more potential" and "based on consistent performances so far in this series" etc etc said to other couples in previous Dance Offs?
As a viewer I am totally confused, and I believe all 4 Judges are equally confused as to what the actual rules are and what they're looking for. Equally the BBC have not been very transparent in explaining the voting to the viewers, we are just asked to "keep voting for your favourites" week after week by Tess.
I think for the Judges to choose which couple went through to the Final rather than it be based purely on which 2 couples received the most votes is scandalous, and as a viewer I want to know the results based on viewer's votes.
It's all a sop to the Judges to have exactly who they want as the winner. They've been moaning for the last few seasons about their favourites being voted off by the public, and have shown yet again early on in this series who their favourite is, and have said so over and over again in interviews who they want to win.
There is no objectivity or impartiality in their views and scores.
I feel no excitement about the Final at all, as it's clear who is the better dancer and who will win. The contestant who could've upset the applecart and who would've been a worthy winner as befits the show's ethos of taking someone who couldn't dance and turning them into a dancer, and who has demonstrated the fun and spirit of the show at all times, was knocked out and will be having to watch.
If it was viewer based I would accept it, but if, as I suspect, the Judges overturned the viewer's verdict then it makes me mad, and very sad, and I feel was a horrible sleight to Camilla, a Pro deserving of a Final place.