• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Appalled at vitriol and ITT question
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
borntosuffer
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by kittles:
“I envy you your pompous certainty that you're right

no need to have a go at mint who has been around on this forum for this whole series and is very well aware of what has been said about all the contestants”


Pompous I may be; but I have no idea if I am right. As I've just replied above, I don't know if Matt's being machiavellian or if he's just an immature twerp.

Nor was i having a go at mint. I really do envy his naivety. What a lovely place the world would be if everybody thought the best of everybody else.... lovely but boring.
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by KDee:
“deaconswit - Welcome
What a fantastic post and totalling agree with you. We Matt & Flavia fans love Alesha & Mathew too so may the best man/women win”

Thanks for the welcome. It will be a great final , I am sure
Mac
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by soulmate61:
“Marks of 10 have repeatedly attracted questions on ITT, including the 10's awarded to Alesha, and even the 10's which Craig did not award. Questions about the sensational four 10's were asked of everybody in sight not just Philip. I gather Philip said it was in the dance-off waltz, not in the original waltz, that Matt twice got ahead of the music. If you truly believe the judges went by the dance-off waltz, then the four 10's waltz was irrelevant to the eviction.

I truly am confused what criterion you prefer for eviction. Is it performance to date, like Football League rules, or four 10's performance or meltdown on the day, like FA Cup rules. I would be quite relaxed to abide by either set of rules. But some would say switching at will from one rule to another would be bad faith -- your candidate right or wrong, at any price, to go through by any means, with the end justifying the means.

If this is vitriol please point to the vitriolic part.”

Umm? you pre-empted my reply?

Mac
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Cally's mum:
“Well said, deaconswit and welcome to the forum.

Most of the posters here are actually reasonable people, able to appreciate others' views. Unfortunately, there are a minority of fans of certain celebrities who seem to adhere to the principle that they're right, everyone else is wrong and that freedom of speech gives them the inalienable right to denigrate not only the other celebrities' dancing but also make nasty personal remarks as well (as we have seen a lot during this series. Mind you, this is not a new phenomenon. It has happened every series, usually about either the 'worst' dancer being kept in by public vote - and the public have every right to vote for whom they want. This show is not the property of those few who post on here - or one of the better dancers (mainly because, probably, there is a fear that this celebrity may win over the one the poster supports. Sorry about the split infinitive there, by the way!).

Of course, freedom of speech is accorded to us all. Unfortunately, what everyone seems to forget is that (a) with it comes a sense of responsibility and (b) there is simply no need for nastiness (it reflects badly on the poster actually, more than the person they're denigrating). But it seems manners and respect are two words some people don't know the meaning of!

However, there has been some very reasonable debate (amidst the inevitable vitriol ) about whether Matt deserves his place in the final (and that's what free speech is actually all about - not Matt, per se obviously! But reasonable debate without resorting to nastiness). Whether he does or not is actually very subjective, I suppose.

I didn't have any particular favourites, and didn't mind in the end who reached the final as long as it was someone who could dance, entertain and make watching the programme joyful (something both Matt and Alesha have achieved - Gethin too over the last few weeks).

In the end, it's simply a TV light entertainment show and once it's over everyone will return to their lives (and other threads on other forums, presumably) until the next one!

And I have to say that even though I too am appalled at some of the sheer vitriol on here, it's actually quite mild compared to the, say, 'Showbiz' part of this forum (and, indeed, other forums!). Which is quite frightening if you think about it, as this is a (n) (admittedly small) representation of the society we live in!! ”


Thanks for the welcome, and so agree with many of your points
Mac
nancy1975
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by deaconswit:
“Nothing wrong with the decisions of the judges being questioned. But, the way it was asked of Phillip?No, it should not have been asked in that way, or replied to in that way, right before a final. It was not tactful, or necessary
If you were Matt, how would you feel now?
Mac”

I can't see as it's the week before the final, when the question could have been asked in any other way.

The question was not 'do you think Matt is worthy of the final?' which I would fully understand would be out of order but 'was the dance worth 4 10s?'

As few of the 10s that have been awarded this series have been REALLY merited IMO I see nothing wrong with questioning the 4 muppets weird marking.

If I were Matt I'd feel determined to go and unleash hell on the dance floor aka Maximus.
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Who Am I?:
“Thank you.

I think I LOVE YOU.”

Thank you
Mac
bobajot
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by deaconswit:
“noy worthy of a reply on this thread, I think
The ain't put me off a little
Mac”

Alright isn't I really have been posting on Yank forums too long.
It is a bit more comprehensible than noy though. Oh and you just did reply.
Servalan
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by deaconswit:
“Nothing wrong with the decisions of the judges being questioned. But, the way it was asked of Phillip?No, it should not have been asked in that way, or replied to in that way, right before a final. It was not tactful, or necessary
If you were Matt, how would you feel now?
Mac”

It's a question that everyone would want to know the answer to - whether that was the right time to ask it is another thing: I suspect opinion would be split on that one.

But why focus the whole thing on Matt?

How do you think Gethin and Camilla felt, hearing what PJ said?

How do you think Alesha feels, when the BBC is shifting everyone's attention on to Matt?

It cuts both ways - something rather a lot of people here seem to forget ...
Ashrell
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“It's a question that everyone would want to know the answer to - whether that was the right time to ask it is another thing: I suspect opinion would be split on that one.

But why focus the whole thing on Matt?

How do you think Gethin and Camilla felt, hearing what PJ said?

How do you think Alesha feels, when the BBC is shifting everyone's attention on to Matt?

It cuts both ways - something rather a lot of people here seem to forget ... ”

Though seeing as it's so unhelpful and unconstructive to everyone I don't see why it has to be asked so many times - once or twice may be OK but the constant reference to "will he remember all 5 routines?" or "did it deserve 40" is getting very stale for all parties concerned.

I'm not so much annoyed with the 40/40 thing, rather the whole question of "Did he deserve to go through?". Now that the decision is made and it is irreversible, it surely undermines the effort that Matt is making right now for the final, as well as make Gethin feel worse.
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by bobajot:
“Alright isn't I really have been posting on Yank forums too long.
It is a bit more comprehensible than noy though. Oh and you just did reply.”

it looks that way.
Mac
deaconswit
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“It's a question that everyone would want to know the answer to - whether that was the right time to ask it is another thing: I suspect opinion would be split on that one.

But why focus the whole thing on Matt?

How do you think Gethin and Camilla felt, hearing what PJ said?

How do you think Alesha feels, when the BBC is shifting everyone's attention on to Matt?

It cuts both ways - something rather a lot of people here seem to forget ... ”

I doubt 'everyone' would. Most would accept the marks, as they have for all of the others.
The question being asked, and the 'shock, horror' people are being asked to display, seriously undermines the contestant
I don't think everyones attention is being shifted onto Matt at all, I believe Alesha is getting the praise she deserves

Mac
Ashrell
20-12-2007
I think all three semi finalists has had their fair share of insults/name-calling/snide comments, not just Matt. And even as a Matt fan, I have absolutely no problems of people discussing his dancing and whether it was worth a 40 in a rational way. What does irritate me though are the flippant and snide remarks people keep making about him unnecessarily, in an unrelated thread and where the comment would add nothing to the discussion - whenever Matt's name is mentioned there is always someone who goes "he is a bad dancer" or "he won't be able to complete 5 dances" etc. Then the thread, which started off with a reasonably intelligent discussion, ends up being a bitch fight between the two schools of supporters.

And that might have belonged better in the tantrum thread actually....!
mintchocchip
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by borntosuffer:
“Pompous I may be; but I have no idea if I am right. As I've just replied above, I don't know if Matt's being machiavellian or if he's just an immature twerp.

Nor was i having a go at mint. I really do envy his naivety. What a lovely place the world would be if everybody thought the best of everybody else.... lovely but boring.”

I'm a girl. And like I said, I can very well imagine the celebs sending people to these boards and adjusting their behaviour accordingly, in fact, part of me doesn't blame them. I also know how well edited these shows are and am always prepared to give people I get a negative impression of the benefit of the doubt (even Gabby!). My gripe was with the (rightfully or wrongfully understood) implication that he had a meltdown on purpose that night.

I don't really see why if he isn't being machiavellian he must be an immature twerp but I'm not gonna argue with you on something you've obviously made your mind up on based on the footage we are shown, after all, that's all we can base our opinions on.
mintchocchip
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Ashrell:
“I'm not so much annoyed with the 40/40 thing, rather the whole question of "Did he deserve to go through?". Now that the decision is made and it is irreversible, it surely undermines the effort that Matt is making right now for the final, as well as make Gethin feel worse.”

This is what bugs me too.
borntosuffer
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Ashrell:
“Though seeing as it's so unhelpful and unconstructive to everyone I don't see why it has to be asked so many times - once or twice may be OK but the constant reference to "will he remember all 5 routines?" or "did it deserve 40" is getting very stale for all parties concerned.

I'm not so much annoyed with the 40/40 thing, rather the whole question of "Did he deserve to go through?". Now that the decision is made and it is irreversible, it surely undermines the effort that Matt is making right now for the final, as well as make Gethin feel worse.”


Having just been accused of pomposity, I'll risk sounding pompous again. There's a bigger picture than your comment acknowledges. The BBC introduced a number of format changes this year, none of which imho have worked. The worst of them is the dance-off. Had last year's voting system been in operation, I would be willing to bet that Matt would not be in the final. Maybe nor would Alesha.

There is a fair weight of opinion among posters that the BBC should consider reversing the changes (although I appreciate that lots of people like the new format and that it probably won't change), so the debate has to be kept going. A debate about the pros and cons of various programme formats would last five minutes. So it has to be personalised.

I lost interest in the programme when it because obvious (a) that the judges were mangling the process, in order to ensure that their favoured two couples reached the final and (b) who they were determined would win it. I would like the programme back the way it was before and so would many others. That's why the "should Matt be in the final?" question isn't going to go away.
mintchocchip
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by kittles:
“no need to have a go at mint who has been around on this forum for this whole series and is very well aware of what has been said about all the contestants”

I don't think he was having a go but thanks very much for sticking up for me kittles
Ashrell
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by borntosuffer:
“Having just been accused of pomposity, I'll risk sounding pompous again. There's a bigger picture than your comment acknowledges. The BBC introduced a number of format changes this year, none of which imho have worked. The worst of them is the dance-off. Had last year's voting system been in operation, I would be willing to bet that Matt would not be in the final. Maybe nor would Alesha.

There is a fair weight of opinion among posters that the BBC should consider reversing the changes (although I appreciate that lots of people like the new format and that it probably won't change), so the debate has to be kept going. A debate about the pros and cons of various programme formats would last five minutes. So it has to be personalised.

I lost interest in the programme when it because obvious (a) that the judges were mangling the process, in order to ensure that their favoured two couples reached the final and (b) who they were determined would win it. I would like the programme back the way it was before and so would many others. That's why the "should Matt be in the final?" question isn't going to go away.”

Yes, I understand that and to an extent I agree with the judges' manipulation. I think it's fair that it is being discussed in forums such as this because that's what the point of it is after all. However, what I do object to is having this discussion on ITT, where the discussion is very public and is an official programme from the BBC, as opposed to a discussion by anonymous members on a message board. The contestants don't need conspiracy theories, discouragement or undermining at this stage in such a public medium.

IMO of course.
borntosuffer
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by mintchocchip:
“I don't think he was having a go but thanks very much for sticking up for me kittles ”

I wasn't; but I do apologise for masculinising you. I should have realised that somebody with your monicker just had to be female (although I'm not sure why because I am a boring individual who couldn't get through the evening without a mint choc chip cornetto!).
Dollystanford
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by kittles:
“oh I know where you're coming from - reminds me of the row I had with my sister age 14 over which one of Duran Duran we'd most like to marry ”

John Taylor, obviously!!

I personally like a bit of argy bargy and banter - it doesn't really hurt anyone and I get sick and tired of constantly having to gush

if I don't like someone, I should be allowed to say so!!
jtnorth
20-12-2007
Personally I have no problem with Philip Jackson answering a direct question when asked. He's entitled to his opinion, there's no evidence anyone is influenced by it and he only said it once.

Completely different is Craig undermining Matt repeatedly on ITT, particularly implying more than once that it will be a miracle if he remembers his dances. I think Craig saved Matt because he genuinely thought Matt was the better choice for the final, because they have never only voted on the dance in front of them, but is now cowardly trying to cover himself if Matt's nerves do get to him again. The failure of the judges to behave like impartial judges really annoys me.
mintchocchip
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by borntosuffer:
“I wasn't; but I do apologise for masculinising you. I should have realised that somebody with your monicker just had to be female (although I'm not sure why because I am a boring individual who couldn't get through the evening without a mint choc chip cornetto!).”

Lol...it is THE BEST ice cream flavour undoubtedly.
Ashrell
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by jtnorth:
“Personally I have no problem with Philip Jackson answering a direct question when asked. He's entitled to his opinion, there's no evidence anyone is influenced by it and he only said it once.

Completely different is Craig undermining Matt repeatedly on ITT, particularly implying more than once that it will be a miracle if he remembers his dances. I think Craig saved Matt because he genuinely thought Matt was the better choice for the final, because they have never only voted on the dance in front of them, but is now cowardly trying to cover himself if Matt's nerves do get to him again. The failure of the judges to behave like impartial judges really annoys me.”

Ditto - you've said it more eloquently than I would've been able to!

And for the record, I can't stand mint choc chip ice cream - and I'm female!
mintchocchip
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Ashrell:
“Ditto - you've said it more eloquently than I would've been able to!

And for the record, I can't stand mint choc chip ice cream - and I'm female! ”

How can you not love the mintiness? And the chocolatiness?!!!
zankoku87
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by mintchocchip:
“ How can you not love the mintiness? And the chocolatiness?!!!”

I have to say I don't like it generally - but After Eight ice cream for some reason, I adore.
bobajot
20-12-2007
Originally Posted by Ashrell:
“Yes, I understand that and to an extent I agree with the judges' manipulation. I think it's fair that it is being discussed in forums such as this because that's what the point of it is after all. However, what I do object to is having this discussion on ITT, where the discussion is very public and is an official programme from the BBC, as opposed to a discussion by anonymous members on a message board. The contestants don't need conspiracy theories, discouragement or undermining at this stage in such a public medium.

IMO of course. ”

Nobody has discussed it on ITT more's the pity. One question one opinion one "really!!" hardly a discussion. I haven't looked at the BBC forums but rumour has it that people are more miffed than here.
<<
<
4 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map