Originally Posted by Ashrell:
“Though seeing as it's so unhelpful and unconstructive to everyone I don't see why it has to be asked so many times - once or twice may be OK but the constant reference to "will he remember all 5 routines?" or "did it deserve 40" is getting very stale for all parties concerned.
I'm not so much annoyed with the 40/40 thing, rather the whole question of "Did he deserve to go through?". Now that the decision is made and it is irreversible, it surely undermines the effort that Matt is making right now for the final, as well as make Gethin feel worse.”
Having just been accused of pomposity, I'll risk sounding pompous again. There's a bigger picture than your comment acknowledges. The BBC introduced a number of format changes this year, none of which imho have worked. The worst of them is the dance-off. Had last year's voting system been in operation, I would be willing to bet that Matt would not be in the final. Maybe nor would Alesha.
There is a fair weight of opinion among posters that the BBC should consider reversing the changes (although I appreciate that lots of people like the new format and that it probably won't change), so the debate has to be kept going. A debate about the pros and cons of various programme formats would last five minutes. So it has to be personalised.
I lost interest in the programme when it because obvious (a) that the judges were mangling the process, in order to ensure that their favoured two couples reached the final and (b) who they were determined would win it. I would like the programme back the way it was before and so would many others. That's why the "should Matt be in the final?" question isn't going to go away.