• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Judges demand more money
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
hiawatha
22-12-2007
Apparently the 4 judges are demanding an increase in their
£60 000 fees for the series.

They were happy to accept it at the start but now think that they are the stars of the show.It has been apparent as the series has gone on they seem to think they are more important than the dancers, especially that dope Len.

If they insist in their demands then get rid of them. There are lots of dance judges out there who are better than this self opinionated gang of four.
They were OK when keeping a role in the background but when they want the show built around them it's time to say
NO.
mossy2103
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by hiawatha:
“Apparently the 4 judges are demanding an increase in their
£60 000 fees for the series.”

Apparently? Where is the article or interview then?
Erinfan
22-12-2007
Daily Mail...therefore I don't know if I believe it!!

If it's true then they should be careful, they are not above the show and they're not particularly popular with many viewers this year.
DavidJames
22-12-2007
Here's the article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1773

Relevant bits are:
Quote:
“Len Goodman, Craig Revel Horwood, Arlene Phillips and Bruno Tonioli have had enough and are threatening to quit unless they get large wage rises.

The four receive £60,000 each for the 12-week run, which has pulled in as many as 12million viewers.

Tonight will be another huge ratings winner as odds-on favourite Alesha Dixon, a television presenter and singer, dances against Matt Di Angelo, the EastEnders actor.

But behind the scenes, the judges are trying to strongarm the BBC into a wage rise - not least because the Strictly format has been sold around the world, earning a fortune for the corporation.

Pay problems have, it appears, been simmering for a while.

Goodman and Tonioli are paid around £200,000 for the U.S. version of the show - Dancing With The Stars.

A source on the show said: "It is the flagship show on BBC's schedule - and has been an incredible ratings winner.

"At the same time they are acutely aware that on ITV's X Factor, the judges are paid more than 15 times the amount they are and that their pay keeps rising. Reports of Dannii Minogue being offered £500,000 for the next series of X Factor seem to have angered them more.

"Closer to home, other stars on BBC are being paid many many millions a year - the obvious example being Jonathan Ross.

"Also added into that mix is the fact that Bruce Forsyth is bound to be replaced on the next series - and a big-name presenter will have to fill that role. The judges are airing their grievances and staking their claim before they hire a big new expensive name to host the show. You can't blame them."

The source added: "Their agents have been working together and have approached the BBC. To their shock, the BBC told them that they could not be seen to be giving them a pay hike while the BBC was cutting costs.

"Making the problem worse is that the franchise has really taken off abroad. Their agents are getting calls to do the shows all over the world. Something has to give and, ultimately, it has to be the BBC."”

Shrug.

It sounds like a press release done by their PR guys to increase pressure on pay negotiations.

There's usually a pay dispute after the 5th year of a series, I think a lot of contracts are pay-locked for 5 years, then if the series is wildly successful, the negotiations start. Standard sort of stuff.
Endemoniada
22-12-2007
I'm not keen on any of these 'judges' in general....but if they can blag a six figure salary for being a bit sh1t then good luck to them I say.
Eternal Life
22-12-2007
I think they deserve it well two of them do anyway.
janjohn
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by hiawatha:
“Apparently the 4 judges are demanding an increase in their
£60 000 fees for the series.

They were happy to accept it at the start but now think that they are the stars of the show.It has been apparent as the series has gone on they seem to think they are more important than the dancers, especially that dope Len.

If they insist in their demands then get rid of them. There are lots of dance judges out there who are better than this self opinionated gang of four.
They were OK when keeping a role in the background but when they want the show built around them it's time to say
NO.”

I totally agree with you. If true, this offers an excellent opportunity for the BBC to get rid of all four before the next series, a move which I think would be popular with the public.
Joanne MA
22-12-2007
How much do the professional dancers get paid for Strictly?
Spinaker5
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by Joanne MA:
“How much do the professional dancers get paid for Strictly?”

Hasn't the sum £25 000 been quoted for both pro dancers and celebrities?
Servalan
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by janjohn:
“I totally agree with you. If true, this offers an excellent opportunity for the BBC to get rid of all four before the next series, a move which I think would be popular with the public.”

After this week, I suspect you'd find street parties celebrating their demise. Len's especially.
Cat Balou
22-12-2007
I would love to see Len replaced but sadly I think it's unlikely.
Joanne MA
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by Spinaker5:
“Hasn't the sum £25 000 been quoted for both pro dancers and celebrities?”

So the Judges are currently paid more than a couple's combined salary. I'd say the Judges have got a good deal in that case then.
dancealong
22-12-2007
£60 000 for three months work - not to mention the spin offs! They're not irreplaceable...
X- factor is on a commercial staion so the money can be more easily afforded. You can't compare the two.
miaviv
22-12-2007
Dancing with the stars and their media hype has gone to their heads, I hate it when the judges become bigger than the stars of the show - GET RID.
Orin
22-12-2007
So our licence fees are paying for them, and they turn around and slag the public off in the press.
Also I thought this show was about raising money for charity? I don't mind the pros getting paid, but the judges believe their own hype now.
Espresso
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by Joanne MA:
“So the Judges are currently paid more than a couple's combined salary. I'd say the Judges have got a good deal in that case then.”

You're not kidding. The couples have to work hard all week for as long as they're in and the judges have one or maybe two slots on ITT in the week, along with one day at the filming.

Cushy number!
dancingfan
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by Erinfan:
“Daily Mail...therefore I don't know if I believe it!!

If it's true then they should be careful, they are not above the show and they're not particularly popular with many viewers this year.”

totally agree - a change would be welcomed - preferably judges who show more respect for their audience
luckyforest
22-12-2007
For the damages they have made (especially Len Goodman) to SCD, I would expect them to repay the money and be sacked. Pay rise, in their dream
Apricot
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by dancingfan:
“totally agree - a change would be welcomed - preferably judges who show more respect for their audience”


Question: why is blatant sexism (a la Len Goodman) more acceptable than blatant racism? If he keeps his job, it would appear that it is.
flat_foot
22-12-2007
just wondering;

how much does everyone on strictly earn eg. pros, judges, presenters and celebs???
Miss Poppy
22-12-2007
The whole cult of certain TV people being overpaid when there are other people could do their jobs just as well really annoys me.

I think it would be great if rather than getting a rise all the judges were sacked and replaced - I bet there's loads of interesting, fresh people out there who could do a great job. And we'd all have forgotten them within weeks!
Spinaker5
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by Miss Poppy:
“The whole cult of certain TV people being overpaid when there are other people could do their jobs just as well really annoys me.

I think it would be great if rather than getting a rise all the judges were sacked and replaced - I bet there's loads of interesting, fresh people out there who could do a great job. And we'd all have forgotten them within weeks!”

Good point. The judges seem (if we can believe the article) to be claiming responsibility for success of the brand. They just happened to get lucky.
Cat Balou
22-12-2007
The BBC should call the judges bluff! I am sure that the show would continue to be very successful if they change one, two or even all of the judges.
hiawatha
22-12-2007
After their performance so far they should have a reduction in fees instead of an increase.
Len especially is a pain, he said to MattD " there were a few foot faults in that routine but we wont worry about that". How can you ignore faults.

I admit it's been close so far but hope Alesha prevails,
she deserves it.
Castanet
22-12-2007
Originally Posted by dancealong:
“£60 000 for three months work - not to mention the spin offs! They're not irreplaceable...
X- factor is on a commercial staion so the money can be more easily afforded. You can't compare the two.”

Exactly - well said.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map