• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Why so much moaning?
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
CLL Dodge
26-12-2007
Originally Posted by Mowbray:
“If it wasn't for RTD, Doctor Who would be still be re - runs on UKTV Gold.
He dragged it kicking and screaming, into the 21st Century, and improved it. Like the old series, some stories were hit and miss, so Whovians should be grateful for what he did.
I've followed Doctor Who from the very beginning.”

None of us are going to disagree with that. We've got our show back and it's great.

But every series the best episodes are by the guest writers. They should be sounding out more of today's top scriptwriters to submit stories for consideration and reduce the burden on RTD to continuously come up with fresh situations for his characters. I wouldn't even want Moffat to contribute half the episodes in a series, just his best 2 episodes.

"Queer as Folk" was as good as TV drama can get but QAF 2 was poor (I still loved the characters but not what they were made to do).
biomorph04
26-12-2007
it is outrageous for people to suggest that the only reason we are moaning is because we all have an agenda.

that xmas episode was rubbish telly.

it was sacharine, bland, unimaginative, lazy, tiresome, and unwatchable..... I switched it off.

my only agenda is that I want quality entertainment please.
jamesp26
26-12-2007
Originally Posted by biomorph04:
“it is outrageous for people to suggest that the only reason we are moaning is because we all have an agenda.

that xmas episode was rubbish telly.

it was sacharine, bland, unimaginative, lazy, tiresome, and unwatchable..... I switched it off.

my only agenda is that I want quality entertainment please.”

Far from it. Who fans like nothing more than a good moan. Its what they like best about the show. Recently I met possibly the most idiotic fan ever who said that the show shouldn't have any sort of large budget as the spirit of the show was the dodgy sets, visiting the quarries and the bad effects. The muppet finished by saying the BBC had stolen Dr Who from the fans!

As the the episode. Absolutely brilliant. It wasn't rubbish telly and i fail to see how even if you didn't like this particular episode that you could appreciate anything about it. How was it unwatchable? Never mind. don't reply. I forgot, you just want a moan.
TimCypher
26-12-2007
Originally Posted by biomorph04:
“...rubbish...sacharine...bland...unimaginative...lazy...tiresome...unwatchable...I switched it off...I want quality entertainment please.”

Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“Criticism of the show is delivered in a completely over-the-top, hysterical manner, usually stated as 'fact' - 'that's an hour of my life I'll never get back', indeed...LMAO, just listen to yourself!”

QED

Regards,

Cypher
Carrierbag Head
26-12-2007
Originally Posted by Mowbray:
“If it wasn't for RTD, Doctor Who would be still be re - runs on UKTV Gold.
He dragged it kicking and screaming, into the 21st Century, and improved it. Like the old series, some stories were hit and miss, so Whovians should be grateful for what he did.
I've followed Doctor Who from the very beginning.”

Well it was great that RTD revived Who, and alot of credit needs to go to him for that, but maybe it's time he passed baton on, as the guy just seems to have run out of ideas. Last night's show was so cliched and unoriginal it was unreal.
Weigh-Man
26-12-2007
I will admit quite freely, I thought it was great, just what I needed on Christmas Day.

Then I come on here and everyones slagging it off, why? It was good telly.

The moaners won't be happy until the series gets canceled, then they will moan at the BBC for canceling it.
seanvice
26-12-2007
Never seen Dr Who before but saw it last night it was amazing
Digital Sid
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“It's because these are Doctor Who fans, who, as a class, are insane freaks!

I had my first foray into DW fandom in the early nineties when I was at uni, and I found the way that some of them carried themselves to be bordering on disturbing.

One guy refused to watch any DW that came after Earthshock (as it was all JNT patronising crap apparently) - another guy believed that the last DW story ever made was 'The Talons Of Weng Chiang', and everything subsequent was a 'forgery' bearing the DW banner - he made a fascinating case, in his little deranged way, of how the JNT & Williams eras were actually 'illegal'!

All complete fruitcakes who should be elevated on the very podium of world psychiatry!

I exited DW fandom shortly after that, but kinda got back into again recently.

And nothing's really changed at all:

1) The producer is largely despised;
2) Criticism of the show is delivered in a completely over-the-top, hysterical manner, usually stated as 'fact' - 'that's an hour of my life I'll never get back', indeed...LMAO, just listen to yourself!

All very, very sad stuff. The big thing now is that the show is actually popular again, and for the right reasons - it's well-made, well-scripted, well-acted, well-plotted and perfectly pitched at the modern audience - hence the awards, the overwhelming wave of positivity from the media, the ratings, the audience appreciation indexes, the critical reviews etc...

I think a lot of long-term DW fans resent that DW is no longer their exclusive, special little plaything that they could feel hubris in liking.

Certainly the fact that VOTD had a very enthusiastic write-up from long-time TV critics in respected newspapers like The Times and The Independent, yet it gets slated on fan message boards, just goes to show the extent of the disconnect.

Regards,

Cypher”

Thats like with little britain fans, they loved series 1 because it was cult, but as soon as it moved to BBC 1 and got popular with chavs they all disowned it and now you'll be lucky to find an active fanboard for the show.

I've been a fan of a lot of cult shows (red dwarf, fast show, dr who, little britain, torchwood, mighty boosh, father ted, my hero etc) and I've seen all of them fall out of popularity when they got popular.

Cult fans are fickle things, one minute they love it, the next the hate it.

I think people need to remember that last night's ep was a christmas special of a primarily children's show. It's not meant to be taken seriously. Just a bit of light hearted fun. It was a lot better than gridlock (series 3), rose (series 2) and the 2 previous christmas specials and almost definitely all of the classic episodes lol.
Anne C
27-12-2007
This is actually my first moan about it...

I hate all disaster movies (especially the bleedin' Poseidon Adventure) and I didn't want to see an homage/ripoff/plagiarised version of something so rubbish.

And I felt the episode fell into an uncomfortable place for Xmas - not wonderfully dark and scary to make it best Dr Who ever, not light hearted and funny to make it a fun romp for the festive holidays. Just depressing death after depressing death, and not even a happy ending. I fear it was designed to fit in between the two episodes of Eastenders, the worst and most depressing show on TV!!!
GhyllenStillwheel
27-12-2007
dr who should be scary / creepy and sometimes mysterious ..the atmosphere is all wrong ..like its set up soley for david tennant show case hero the mad dash to save the world as usual ...its got so ..b.o.r.i.n.g ... its too much about him at the moment ...
timetogetagrip
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by SLEETKIN:
“dr who should be scary / creepy and sometimes mysterious ..the atmosphere is all wrong ..like its set up soley for david tennant show case hero the mad dash to save the world as usual ...its got so ..b.o.r.i.n.g ... its too much about him at the moment ...”

you do know what the programme is called don't you
And to think it was only last year evryone was complaining it was all about Rose and not the doctor ...
Chris Davies
27-12-2007
The fact is that many people on this forum can't see past the 'written by RTD' on the credits of an episode. I'd be willing to bet that if VOTD had been credited to Steven Moffat, it would have received far less harsh treatment on these boards. Let's face it, that's exactly what happened with the embarrassment that was Time Crash.
TimCypher
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by Chris Davies:
“The fact is that many people on this forum can't see past the 'written by RTD' on the credits of an episode. I'd be willing to bet that if VOTD had been credited to Steven Moffat, it would have received far less harsh treatment on these boards.”

You only have to read some of the pre-emptive comments in this thread to see how true your observation is, Chris.

Regards,

Cypher
Fizzbin
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“You only have to read some of the pre-emptive comments in this thread to see how true your observation is, Chris.

Regards,

Cypher”

And by the o/p of this thread too - lol
Rooks
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“I think a lot of long-term DW fans resent that DW is no longer their exclusive, special little plaything that they could feel hubris in liking.”

That's a tad unfair Tim. It's not about popularity and it's way off the mark to suggest it. I've seen this mentioned often, normally as a way of devalueing someones argument. If you went to a Harry Potter forum, or a Lord of the Rings forum you'd see a lot of people spitting venom on the movie versions of the books. They've seen something they love and hate the way it's been interpreted (in bold because it's the important bit of this post ). It's not because it's no longer 'their property'. The new series of Doctor Who is an interpretation of the original show. Some older fans like it, others don't.

Oh and as for the theory that some of the anti-new series posters only come on here to post hatred against it, well if you look in the main Voyage of the Damned thread, I enjoyed the christmas special and said as much. When I enjoy it I'll say so, it's just that it doesn't happen often
dgcyberman
27-12-2007
VOTD was the best thing on telly (so far) this xmas, the AI rating was 86 (excellant and the best mainstream figure) and the viewing figures were outstanding, the polls on the forums rate it so the question is do we want a show wrapped up in continuity (which new who drips very slowly back in) with poor sets and jobbing writers or do we want big ,bold, showy and expensive (relativly) but most importantly family friendly non reality telly, RTD will always atract flak as a massive fan of the show he got the balls to do it his way and attract a massive mainstream\family audience when he steps away and the clamour for moffat ( yes his hit rate is four\four) or cornell (three\three) and they are to busy to commit for four years and we are left with an ex-staffer at my family we will look back at these years with acute fondness,
yes RTD has written some of the poorer episodes (long game\boom town) and only liked TRB on its second viewing but when he is good he is very good.
TimCypher
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by Rooks:
“That's a tad unfair Tim. It's not about popularity and it's way off the mark to suggest it.”

My thoughts concerning a lot of long term fans weren't directed at those who merely have a different opinion on Who, or those who simply do not like the new interpretation.

That's their perogative - got no problem with that. I've got no right to have a problem with that.

My issue is with those who continually spit intellectually bankrupt bile on the show, ranting hysterically about how DW is being destroyed, stating their opinion as if it was fact in a breathtaking display of arrogance.

Gets my goat up, to tell you the truth.

I've met plenty of folk like that in real life (the JNT/Williams haters) - gave you some anecdotes earlier, so, as a phenomenon, I know they do exist.

It was not intended as a broad brush comment to encompass all long-term fans (as I'm one myself), and you're certainly excluded Mr. Rooks...

Regards,

Cypher
Rooks
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by TimCypher:
“My issue is with those who continually spit intellectually bankrupt bile on the show, ranting hysterically about how DW is being destroyed, stating their opinion as if it was fact in a breathtaking display of arrogance.”

I understand what you are saying. It works both ways though. There's an equal number of posters that simply won't have a bad word said against the show and they use the "oh your are a real fan so you hate everything because we took back the series from you" argument which is utter claptrap. Then again, I'm still in a state of shock from defending the show early on. I'm sure when Christmas is over I'll get back to my normal self
dervish
27-12-2007
Originally Posted by Rooks:
“I understand what you are saying. It works both ways though. There's an equal number of posters that simply won't have a bad word said against the show and they use the "oh your are a real fan so you hate everything because we took back the series from you" argument which is utter claptrap. self ”

CORRECT!!!

It seems those that have occasional valid criticisms of the programme (such as myself and others) do often mention the good episodes - I regularly say how much I thought "Blink" was fantastic Dr Who, as was "Girl in the Fireplace", "Werewolves", "Dalek" etc.

However those that uber-defend the show always seem as if they think it is perfect and NEVER mention any negatives. They then harras, and verbally assault those who dare to criticise their beloved show and their beloved leader. It is the apologists who take it eprsonally - as if the porgramme is their proeprty.
dd68
27-12-2007
It was good episode and it delivered the viewers.Simple
Chet_Dyson
27-12-2007
Yes, moaners, you are moaning. Dress it up how you like, justify it how you like but, on the balance of probabilities, you are moaning. Judge Dyson has spoken.

I personally thought the Xmas Special was a bit dull as it lacked a really strong sci-fi element but clearly lots of people liked something about it. For me, the scene with "The Cribbins" and the coda with Clive Swift made it worth watching. It was not however the end of the world, a travesty of entertainment, the poorest television anywhere, a waste of licence payer's money...zzzzz....

For every 'Aliens of London' (that had a really good pre-credits sequence by the way) there's a 'Blink' (slow starter but came good). For every RTD script that isn't aimed at me, there's another RTD script which really inspires - is there anyone who didn't feel the hairs on the back of their neck stand up when Christopher Eccleston gave his 'NO' speech? Daleks and Cybermen arguing in a Dad's army tribute fashion? Loved it.

Yes, in a perfect world, there'd be twice the writing staff, four times the budget 48 hours in a day and anyone they ever wanted to cast would be instantly available. But this isn't a perfect world, and in an age with so much pain and misery, and having missed this programme for years before it came back, I'll gladly suffer something like The Idiot's Lantern (shame they cut the line linking it to Logopolis) because someone somewhere will have really enjoyed it and that makes it worthwhile in my book even if it's not the best telly ever.
mossy2103
28-12-2007
Originally Posted by dervish:
“ I regularly say how much I thought "Blink" was fantastic Dr Who, as was "Girl in the Fireplace", "Werewolves", "Dalek" etc.”

Werewolves? I must have missed that one, I watched Tooth and Claw instead.
Blackhorse47
28-12-2007
I'm sure I remember a certain producer commenting a few times in the confidential program that if the Who fans are up in arms complaining he's done something right. Sounds as if he has!
farrendahl
28-12-2007
Maybe people only make these threads about moaning as to get Dervish's valuable insight. After all she only seems to post when she has something to whine about or if Ghosts come into the equation.

Ghosts which of course as we all know MOAN. Coincidence?
nottinghamc
28-12-2007
I enjoyed it, the bit with peth turning into that blue cloud was rubbish, but besides that it was good family christmas entertainment, although parts were a bit obvious.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map