|
||||||||
Widescreen - Stupid Question? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Enfield Lock
Posts: 2,954
|
Widescreen - Stupid Question?
I am sorry if this is a really stupid question, but I know there are black bars on my TV during films as my TV is 16:9 and films are 2:13 (I think?), so why didn't TV manufactures make TV's in the correct ratio for films initally?
It just seems pointless having widescreen with the black bars. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
I am sorry if this is a really stupid question, but I know there are black bars on my TV during films as my TV is 16:9 and films are 2:13 (I think?), so why didn't TV manufactures make TV's in the correct ratio for films initally?
It just seems pointless having widescreen with the black bars. Personally I'd rather have a 2.35:1 TV even though it means that I'd have bars more often than I do currently. The reason for this is that the height of the picture would remain the same which is the important factor in viewing distance - the bars would always be there for non 2.35:1 programmes (the majority). I don't understand the "hang up" about "black bars" - what is the problem that people have with these?. I actually have grey bars for 4:3 viewing because it limits image retention on my plasma and even they become unnoticeable after a short time whereas fattyvision or the claustrophobia caused by zooming in would never be acceptable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,313
|
Quote:
films are 2:13 (I think?), so why didn't TV manufactures make TV's in the correct ratio for films initally?
Any 4:3 broadcasts would take up a tiny square in the middle of the screen, with an incredible amount of wasted space in black bars to the left and right if TVs were produced to a 2.35:1 ratio. Or these numpties who stretch the picture to fill the screen would have Olive Oyl looking like a 25 stone elephant. Mandy Dingle would be really scary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
Most (but not all) movies are in 2.35:1 ratio. Widescreen TV is not in 2.35:1 ratio. A lot of people who have widescreen televisions may never watch movies. Why should they have to put up with an elongated television designed purely to show some films without black bars when they never watch movies, but have to put up with black vertical bars on everything that they do watch because TV programmes are not made in that format?
Any 4:3 broadcasts would take up a tiny square in the middle of the screen, with an incredible amount of wasted space in black bars to the left and right if TVs were produced to a 2.35:1 ratio. Or these numpties who stretch the picture to fill the screen would have Olive Oyl looking like a 25 stone elephant. Mandy Dingle would be really scary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,506
|
Quote:
I am sorry if this is a really stupid question, but I know there are black bars on my TV during films as my TV is 16:9 and films are 2:13 (I think?), so why didn't TV manufactures make TV's in the correct ratio for films initally?
It just seems pointless having widescreen with the black bars. Not relevent for plasma / LCD screens of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
Quote:
Remember that the first widescreen TVs were CRT. I think it would be very hard (and/or expensive) to make a 2.35:1 CRT that wouldn't implode unless the glass was very thick. It would also be pretty hard to get the electron beam to scan accurately across such a non-square screen. So 16:9 may well be close to the CRT limit, and that became the standard.
Not relevent for plasma / LCD screens of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
|
Not all widescreen films have black bars when viewed on a widescreen television. A great number (past and present) use the 1.85:1 ratio, which is so close to the 1.77:1 (16:9) of widescreen TV that on most sets the bars won't even be visible. You can't have a TV ratio that perfectly matches the cinematic ratio because there are two standard ratios (1.85:1 and 2.35:1). Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcar
Since films can be any ratio (some are still made 4:3 like "Eyes Wide Shut") then you can't make a TV that fits all films.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
Although Eyes Wide Shut was shot full frame 4:3 (like all of Kubrick's films after 2001: A Space Odyssey) it was framed and matted to widescreen for its theatrical presentation. Kubrick removed the matte for the TV versions of his films simply because he didn't like to see his films being cropped. The HD disc versions of Eyes Wide Shut and earlier films have been remastered in widescreen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 336
|
UK Gold
What annoys me is stations like UK Gold put in black bars unnecessarily by squashing the picture and then ticking their logo in the black bar. So pointless, is it to try and show we were all short and obese 30 years ago so why worry now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
What annoys me is stations like UK Gold put in black bars unnecessarily by squashing the picture and then ticking their logo in the black bar. So pointless, is it to try and show we were all short and obese 30 years ago so why worry now?
![]() It'll be good when they do go widescreen though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 797
|
At this point I would normally rant about the fact that UK Gold comes from the same building as the BBC used to play out their material yet fail to provide their output in widescreen - but at least now we've been told that they're going to be doing true widescreen sometime this year...
about time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 18 miles from Sandy Heath
Posts: 382
|
It's reported in the media that early Philips Ambilight TVs had a problem with black aspect ratio bars (no ambilight top and bottom)...
If ambilight is so great why doesn't someone create a version that replaces the black bars with dynamicly illuminated bars as per ambilight? Quick patent it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
If ambilight is so great ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 336
|
Quote:
What UK Gold programme is this? What UK Gold do is show the 14:9 version that the BBC showed on analogue in a 4:3 frame - there's no squashing involved in the ones I've seen.
The same problem with UK People & UK Documentary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
|
Quote:
Ah, just reset my TV from Wide to Normal and no longer do I get Obese people but Today, Sunday, on UK History, Walking with Dinasours @ 09:00 the picture has a black band each side and top and bottom, the logo extends into the black bar at the top and commercials also go to the top and bottom of the screen. Via HDMI my TV doesn't have a zoom facility (it does via scart) - any suggestions?
The same problem with UK People & UK Documentary. They have the copies of the programs that BBC made to send 16:9 over analogue, they converted to 14:9 letterbox as a compromise. Your best bet is to watch via scart and switch to 14:9 or just put up with the bars. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:02.

