|
||||||||
Traveling to US need advice on PAL mini DV please |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Derbyshire / UK
Posts: 3,755
|
Traveling to US need advice on PAL mini DV please
Hey, sorry if this is in the wrong forum...
I'm considering traveling to the US for a month or 2 in the next year and intend to take my (PAL) mini DV cam with me. Naturally I know that they use NTSC, but due to the nature of the trip (urban exploration) I would like to know if I should just stock up on PAL mini DVs or is it easy enough with a PC to burn my PAL tapes to PAL DVD (in the US) or convert them to NSTC on DVD and save on the ammount of tapes I will have to carry? Or failing that should I just buy a digital camcorder that uses memory cards for storage and get around the whole standards problem that way? And money is very much an issue so I can't afford a duel standard camera. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
I'd avoid converting PAL to NTSC for several reasons, firstly it's not easy to do without good (expensive) software, secondly NTSC looks rubbish compared to PAL (seems a shame to deliberately ruin your footage!) and also you'd need a laptop to do this.
miniDV tapes are cheap, small and probably the best way to archive the footage. I spent 3 months travelling the US in a car and would not suggest lugging any more equipment than necessary, having a laptop is a liability and might just get stolen. If you have the ability, burning to DVD while there is an idea I guess, but then you're into MPG2 domain whereas keeping the original miniDV tapes keeps the footage at the highest DVAVI quality. Finally, if it were me, I might well consider a tapeless camcorder, HD not DVD though, as long as you think it has sufficient recording space for a long trip (or just try and record carefully and don't be too touristy!) Lots of choices, not really one answer! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 10,529
|
All Mini DV tapes are the same - there's no such thing as a blank PAL or NTSC tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
Quote:
All Mini DV tapes are the same - there's no such thing as a blank PAL or NTSC tape.
Aren't miniDV tapes are marked as PAL or NTSC? - I believe the only technical difference will be that a 60 minute NTSC will run longer if recorded as PAL, due to frame rate being higher for NTSC. Or am I thinking back to analogue days!?? lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central London
Posts: 6,845
|
Quote:
Aren't miniDV tapes are marked as PAL or NTSC?
Quote:
I believe the only technical difference will be that a 60 minute NTSC will run longer if recorded as PAL, due to frame rate being higher for NTSC. Or am I thinking back to analogue days!?? lol
The Mini DV tape is designed to store a stream of digital data at a fixed bitrate regardless of resolution/frame rate so the length of DV video it can store is the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 10,529
|
Quote:
Oh did I misunderstand the original question? hmmmm
Aren't miniDV tapes are marked as PAL or NTSC? - I believe the only technical difference will be that a 60 minute NTSC will run longer if recorded as PAL, due to frame rate being higher for NTSC. Or am I thinking back to analogue days!?? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
ah, i'm thinking of analogue.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Derbyshire / UK
Posts: 3,755
|
Thanks for the answers. I had no idea that mini DVs were "universal" untill I checked a tape I would swear blind they were marked PAL, however as mentioned it's just the camera that has a PAL analogue output. I guess as money will be tight I will just take as many tapes as is practical and then stock up later if needed.
Just one other question - How much lower is the quality in long play mode? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sussex
Posts: 12,173
|
I'd avoid long play not as it makes any difference to picture quality (it doesn't) but can potentially be troublesome when playing back as the same high data is put onto tape, it has to be squeezed more closely on the tape so any slight tape / camcorder problems can render it unplayable.
Do a Google search for something like 'miniDV LP problems' and see what you get. One example http://www.2-popforums.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=82495 (See bottom post) You'll see many people complaining that they're unable to play back their LP recordings at all.... so I don't think it's worth the risk. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:02.

