• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
576,965 votes.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
bystander
07-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Gregorian
Man can not live on texts alone - especially as this charge of 25p is likely to come down over the years ”

Wasn't the phone vote in BB1 only 10p and that's gone UP.

In BB1 and maybe BB2, part of the money went to charity and that doesn't happen anymore.

The trend for the 25p text vote is more likely to be upwards.
Gregorian
07-07-2003
I find it very unlikely that it will be allowed to go up over the medium term given the cost of keeping such a service going averages out at less than 1p a text. The regulators will get involved sooner or later - remember too that it is kids under 16 who are often the ones making these purchases.
Papyrus
07-07-2003
...it is odd, what with Oftel's recent regulation recommendation; that these companies can still charge such sums etc etc...
bystander
07-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Gregorian
I find it very unlikely that it will be allowed to go up over the medium term given the cost of keeping such a service going averages out at less than 1p a text. The regulators will get involved sooner or later - remember too that it is kids under 16 who are often the ones making these purchases. ”

The 25p is on top of the cost of the text charge.
Has the regulator any jurisdiction over the 25p Channel 4 charge and isn't it similar to a premium call rate, where you can charge what you like?
Gregorian
07-07-2003
We should ask one of these guys

Channel4-Endemol-TwoWayTV's agreement

Channel 4, independent producer Endemol Entertainment UK and interactive specialist Two Way TV have signed an agreement to allow the latest series of Big Brother's viewers to use their television remote control handset to vote out a nominated housemate.

Two Way TV has enabled digital cable viewers on NTL, who are watching Big Brother on E4, to cast votes via their handset - by pressing the red button on an interactive panel which appears around the broadcast picture, containing the names of evictees. The viewer presses the relevant number alongside their chosen name. This will cost 25p a go but there are polls and votes and viewers receive constantly updated information about what is going on in the Big Brother house.

Two Way TV's Head of Business Affairs Tracy Munro says, "Casting your vote for the person you most dislike is at the centre of Big Brother and by being able to do that by pressing a button on your remote makes that process even easier. We anticipate it will prove, pro rata, preferable to picking up the phone. With E-Victor, the game is inextricably linked to the programme. You can't win unless you've watched."

Channel 4's Head of Interactive Television Peter Good says, "With this year's series we wanted to build on the cross platform success of Big Brother by adding new TV elements. Two Way TV has a wealth of experience in allowing viewers to interact with content through their remote controls. This technology will allow viewers to experience the drama of Big Brother in a new way."

In the UK the Two Way TV channel is available to NTL and Telewest digital cable subscribers. It will also be on digital terrestrial broadcast platform ONdigital from summer 2001. Recent deals will see Two Way TV creating interactive content for MTV and working with top games developer Infogrames.
munkeee
07-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Longsightboy
Mystic Nutmeg, Did every evictee have over a million votes by the end of BB3? ”

I'm not mystic_nutmeg but I'll answer anyway. The answer is yes, so that means every eviction in BB3 got over a million votes. While only one in BB4 has topped a million so far.

Week 7 - PJ evicted - 1,355,126
Week 8 - Tim evicted - 1,452,005
Week 9 - Kate wins - 8,572,373
Eusebius
08-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by munkeee

Week 7 - PJ evicted - 1,355,126
Week 8 - Tim evicted - 1,452,005
Week 9 - Kate wins - 8,572,373
”

Thanks munkeee!

I hope you don't mind if I make a small correction ....

Week 8 -- 1,781,989 total votes (of which Tim 1,452,005 &nbsp; and Alex 329,984)
munkeee
08-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by mystic_nutmeg
Thanks munkeee!

I hope you don't mind if I make a small correction ....

Week 8 -- 1,781,989 total votes (of which Tim 1,452,005 &nbsp; and Alex 329,984)
”

Doh! Thanks mystic_nutmeg for pointing it out
Hamlet77
08-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by mystic_nutmeg
Just bringing these stats over from last week's thread, and updating with today's and last year's wk6 figures:

BB4
Week 1 - Anouska evicted - 594,393 votes...... £148,598.25
Week 2 - Justine evicted - 640,081 votes........ £160,020.25
Week 3 - Sissy evicted - 897,852 votes............. £224,463.00
Week 4 - Fed & Jon evicted - 1,735,317 votes... £433,829.25
Week 5 - Tania evicted - 676, 109 votes ........... £169,027.25
Week 6 - Gos evicted - 576,965 votes.................£144,241.25

BB3
Week 1 - Lynne evicted - 1,200,000 votes*............ £300,000
Week 2 - Alison evicted - 1,405,191 votes........... £351,297.75
Week 3 - Lee evicted - 1,204,346 votes ............... £301,086.50
Week 4 - Spencer evicted - 2,740,988 votes........ £685,247
Week 5 - Sophie evicted - 1,039,770 votes.......... £259,942.50
Week 6 - Adele evicted - 3,427,202 votes............. £856,600.50

( *[size=1]approximate figure, couldn't find exact figure but it is quoted in various news reports at the time as "just over 1.2million" total votes cast[/size])

Accumulative to wk6 :
BB3 ..... 11,017,497 votes...... £2,754,374
BB4 ....... 5,120,717 votes....... £1,280,179

= currently down 54% on last year ...........especially abysmal when you consider that BB4 wks 4 & 6 are inflated by anomalous circumstances
”

I am gobsmacked that they are still making that sort of money even now over a million and a quarter in 6 weeks.

Just point out one thing, premium line revenue is split aproximately 50/50 with BT or whoever supplies the lines, probably BT as the main sponser is their sister mobile group.

Just goes to show though what a cash cow BB is, no wonder they can afford private jets for the swap.

How much do they share with C4? Or do C4 have to bite the bullet and actually pay Endemol to produce the programme?

My god Endemol (worldwide television domination) Inc really are rolling in it even when they come up with a s**t version this year.
duncann
08-07-2003
I don't know the split of income on BB but 02's usual deal with small clients on votes via txt is to make no charge upfront to put the system in place but to then charge 15p for each txt vote to cover the telecom costs. The remaining 10p profit is then split 50/50. In other words 02 takes 20p and the client takes 5p. On that deal Endemol/C4 would be getting only 20% of the figures shown above. But of course they may have done a completely different deal.

The voting and txt income, while substantial, is peripheral to the huge income generated from selling the format licence around the world and from the ad revenue to C4/E4. BB is responsible for more than 50% of the entire annual ratings for E4, for example.

All of the housemates get free bed and board (sometimes poor rations) and the winner gets £70K. But that is nothing compared to the huge revenues generated by the series. If the HMs go on to make money themselves after that is their own affair and even then the producers are often acting as their agents scraping another 20% off the top. So in that sense BB is quite exploitative.
pettra
08-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by boardmarker
I wonder about this too. The only certainty is that only their shareholders will get told anything informative. Have I got time to learn enough Dutch before their next annual report, I wonder? ”

Just wondering how the Dutch is coming along!?
Gregorian
10-07-2003
A good impression of the Dutch
and the ugliest language in the world - is to say "dopping da penn in da ink" - very fast - in english dipping the pen in the ink
Cwej
10-07-2003
I completely forgot that the money used to go partially to charity... I think it's disgusting they stopped that.

I reckon that the texting could be a valid reason for WHY voting is down so much. I would never spend more than £1 on BB a week - and I presume other people a;lso have limits, lower or higher. Some of their money probably goes on the inane texts now, and some on voting, whereas before it was all voting.
ricky321
10-07-2003
All Endamol programmes i.e Who wants to be a millionare,BB and numerous others, some still in the pipeline make money from participants trying to engage in the programme.
Its called interactive television,Im just suprised its took you so long to work it out.
As well as wasting your life watching this rubbish you want to give them money!
Gregorian
10-07-2003
The lottery makes shitloads of profit for Camelot. I agree that BB's and other reality TV shows are so ubiquitous because of the profitability of the shows rather than public interest. I think we all agree that the reality TV genre is saturated. But the media cos are not letting go of these dollars - except of course Celeb BB (charitable element) which was hanged. The TV cos are desperate to keep the masses happy - that is why they subsidise the papers and other media to keep on covering BB like it's front page news. In fact, we are being brainwashed into accepting that this reality TV genre is here to stay whether we like it or not, when in fact most of us would rather watch the Learning Zone, a good documentary or film.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map