DS Forums

 
 

Space and Astronomy Thread


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20-03-2011, 11:49
HenryGarten
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,567
That's quite neat )
Indeed. It is great to be able to investigate sunrise times in western China. Scottish farmers would feel quite good that they do not have to put up with that situation.
HenryGarten is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-03-2011, 10:45
squack
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 607
This looks like a great way to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the first man in space: http://www.firstorbit.org/

It is a film using modern footage from the ISS to 'recreate' what Gagarin would have seen on his flight as the first man in space.

Nice idea.
squack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-03-2011, 12:25
Darthchaffinch
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,104
I think it`s great !!

Too cloud here grrrr and the night before was so clear
Thank you!

I discivered this little tool last night. I have not come across anything quite like it before. See http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s....php?t=1451015
I find this is better, especially when planning a photo!
http://photoephemeris.com/
Darthchaffinch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-03-2011, 17:16
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927

...was featured on a BBC radio documentary earlier on in the week and the relevant links are here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00nycw3
http://herschel.cf.ac.uk/results/whirlpool-galaxy

The Hershel telescope is dedicated to infrared astronomy and its mirror is 3.5 metres in diameter and that is 1.5x the Hubble Space Telescope's mirror. However, the more you go into the infrared, the longer the wavelength is and the poorer the resolution is so scroll down on that first link and looking at the Whirlpool Galaxy in the different infrared wavelengths show this.

Even the best infrared picture is still worse than the best optical picture from Hubble here:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...mat/large_web/
http://herschel.cf.ac.uk/files/M51_H...S_3colours.jpg
TelevisionUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2011, 03:56
balthasar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Osaka
Posts: 2,007
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject..
balthasar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-03-2011, 12:28
geordiejackie
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,267
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html

A really beautiful time lapse from Norway of the aurora stunning work by the cameraman
geordiejackie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-03-2011, 14:57
Assa2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject..
No. There was the Constellation project which included Orion as the next manned spaceship for NASA but nthat has largely been cancelled and NASA are now looking to private ventures to come up with replacements. In the mean time the US & ESA will use Russia's Soyuz to get to and from the ISS.
Assa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2011, 13:26
balthasar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Osaka
Posts: 2,007
No. There was the Constellation project which included Orion as the next manned spaceship for NASA but nthat has largely been cancelled and NASA are now looking to private ventures to come up with replacements. In the mean time the US & ESA will use Russia's Soyuz to get to and from the ISS.
Once the shuttle is retired, Nasa will have a lot of attention focused
on what comes next, In terms of manned space flight.
balthasar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 12:28
tiger2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158
From National Geographic...

NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory has been orbiting Earth since February 2010, watching the sun with a suite of instruments designed to monitor the evolution of solar activity. But twice a year the spacecraft's orbit brings it into an "eclipse" season, when SDO slips behind Earth for up to 72 minutes a day.

During these short periods, the craft sees the sun partly in Earth's shadow. But unlike the solar eclipses seen from Earth—which appear crisp due to the airlessness of moon—SDO's eclipses are filtered through Earth's atmosphere. This creates an uneven edge to the shadow cast on the sun, as seen in the picture, captured March 29.

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...59951_huge.jpg

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...14_600x450.jpg
tiger2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 12:54
J6ngo1977
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,487
I love space and cosmology. Dr Brian Cox is my hero
J6ngo1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 13:06
BeethovensPiano
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ♫ At The Keyboard ♫
Posts: 11,556
BeethovensPiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 16:14
tiger2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158
Great news for British astronomy...

Jodrell Bank chosen as base for largest radio telescope

Jodrell Bank Observatory in Cheshire has been selected as the headquarters for a £1.3bn project to build the world's biggest radio telescope. An agreement to run the Square Kilometre Array from Jodrell Bank was signed in Rome by Australia, China, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. SKA is designed to answer some key questions about the Universe. Its location is undecided but could be built in Australia or Southern Africa.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12947435
tiger2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 17:22
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
How much would you weigh on other stellar objects?.
http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weight/

Apparently I'd weigh 1,680,000,000,000 stones on a neutron star, that's about 10,500,000,000 tons!! (For a merest fraction of a second before I got squished into sub atomic particles.)

Mind boggling.! literally
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 16:58
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject..
No. There was the Constellation project which included Orion as the next manned spaceship for NASA but nthat has largely been cancelled and NASA are now looking to private ventures to come up with replacements. In the mean time the US & ESA will use Russia's Soyuz to get to and from the ISS.
As Assa2 has pointed out, the USA will be dependent on Russia's Soyuz rocket http://www.google.co.uk/images?um=1&...&aqi=&aql=&oq= for the immediate future once all the shuttles have been taken out of service.

In the medium term, the likely replacements for the shuttle originate from the private sector and what they are basically doing is reinventing the Saturn 1 rocket http://www.google.co.uk/images?um=1&...&aqi=&aql=&oq= which will take astronauts into Earth orbit and to the ISS but they're not powerful enough to go to the Moon.

The two private sector contenders are Space X's Dragon capsule http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Dragon to be launched atop the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9 rocket and Orbital Science's Prometheus lifting body http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HL20_mockup.jpeg to be launched atop an Atlas V rocket http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V. At the time of writing, Space X's proposals seem to be closer to practical realisation.

Space News Update


Earth is a gravity potato...

...and there's more here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12911806. The mass of the Earth is not uniformly spread and that means that parts of the planet contain more mass than other parts. That produces a variation in the Earth's gravitational field and that very variation has now been mapped by the GOCE satellite to produce a rather unusual gravity strength map.

The launch of the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA)...

...is covered in this article here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12924060. This new body will be responsible for devising and implementing British space policy and there's more at UKSA's website here http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency. This new agency will have a budget of some £220 million a year and space science recently received a boost in the last budget of £10 million http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12833654.

Whilst this is good news, UK funding for space is way behind other states such as France. The best that can be said is that UK space science is at least going in the right direction now.
TelevisionUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 15:02
Assa2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
The launch of the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA)...

...is covered in this article here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12924060. This new body will be responsible for devising and implementing British space policy and there's more at UKSA's website here http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency. This new agency will have a budget of some £220 million a year and space science recently received a boost in the last budget of £10 million http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12833654.

Whilst this is good news, UK funding for space is way behind other states such as France. The best that can be said is that UK space science is at least going in the right direction now.
Slightly ironically other countries, especially the USA, are moving away from centralised funding of space programmes and towards more commerciallise projects. The UK space industry is one of the world leaders so we've had that sort of model for a long time. However it's concentrated where the money is i.e. commercial satellites and Defence applications. There's not much money to be made out of science or manned space flight at the moment. The minute that chages (especially manned space flight) I imagine the private sector in this country will be in the vanguard. I'm sure I've seen some proposals from BAe for SpaceShip2-like sub-orbital craft recently.

I'm not convinced the UKSA is a worthwhile move in the long run unless it gets some sort of regulatory role to 'manage' a burgeoning manned space flight industry in this country much like the CAA does for civil aviation.
Assa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 20:28
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
Slightly ironically other countries, especially the USA, are moving away from centralised funding of space programmes and towards more commerciallise projects. The UK space industry is one of the world leaders so we've had that sort of model for a long time. However it's concentrated where the money is i.e. commercial satellites and Defence applications. There's not much money to be made out of science or manned space flight at the moment. The minute that chages (especially manned space flight) I imagine the private sector in this country will be in the vanguard. I'm sure I've seen some proposals from BAe for SpaceShip2-like sub-orbital craft recently.

I'm not convinced the UKSA is a worthwhile move in the long run unless it gets some sort of regulatory role to 'manage' a burgeoning manned space flight industry in this country much like the CAA does for civil aviation.
The UK is a world leader in terms of commercial satellites and their components and specialist instruments for scientific satellites and deep space probes.

I suspect, Assa2, that a good part of UKSA's work will involve the funding and coordination of funding for space science work that won't get funded by the private sector, e.g. remote sensing for environmental purposes in Earth orbit, exploration of the Earth's electromagnetic environment, space probes to study the Sun and planets, etc. and that's no bad thing. Such funding should result in high-tech jobs staying in the UK so that the economy benefits too.
TelevisionUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 07:37
Assa2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
Referring back to the discussion a few posts ago about the future of the US's manned space program, SpaceX has announced plans to launch the largest rocket since the Saturn V in 2 years time:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12975872

This heavy-lift rocket could put into LEO
more than a fully loaded Boeing 737 with 136 passengers, luggage and fuel
Wow!
Assa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 19:54
TelevisionUser
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
Referring back to the discussion a few posts ago about the future of the US's manned space program, SpaceX has announced plans to launch the largest rocket since the Saturn V in 2 years time:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12975872

This heavy-lift rocket could put into LEO

Wow!
That's the type of vehicle that could be converted to take crews after thorough testing which will take some time. That means that the USA will be completely dependent upon Russia's Soyuz to get their astronauts into orbit for the next few years - how embarassing for them!

With hindsight, the USA might have better to go down the road of keeping the Saturn 1 assembly line going and putting Apollo capsules or lifting bodies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_body on top of them to carry astronauts into space and back again. That way they'd still have a viable launch capability today.

As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk
TelevisionUser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 14:14
HenryGarten
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,567
Nice link here. What does it take to make an astronaut?
HenryGarten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 15:38
Mallaha
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DTG Bunker
Posts: 5,044
As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk
Ex-NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman is also now a senior engineer at SpaceX.
Mallaha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2011, 16:53
Mandark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,583
That's the type of vehicle that could be converted to take crews after thorough testing which will take some time. That means that the USA will be completely dependent upon Russia's Soyuz to get their astronauts into orbit for the next few years - how embarassing for them!
Yeah, we moan at the mess we got into with our defence budget but America's made an even bigger mess of its manned space programme. It soon won't have one!!

You tend to suspect that NASA has suffered at the expense of the US defence budget. That could backfire, especially on the Air Force, as NASA did a lot of research which was then used for military purposes.
Mandark is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:44
Assa2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
With the construction of the ISS virtually complete the role of the space shuttle has ended. Given the rate of crew rotation on the ISS you would only need 4 missions or so a year. According to NASA each shuttle launch costs $450m although I'm sure I saw a figure of over $1billion before. Certainly there are other high costs involved in maintaining the fleet when not in flight prep. In other words the shuttle would be a very expensive and infrequent bus service.

NASA bought 15 seats on future Soyuz missions at $48m per seat back in 2007 but that also included several 'Progress' cargo launches for supplies so the actual cost of a Soyuz seat is rather less (Russia make a nice profit). Current rate for a space tourist flight in Soyuz to the ISS is $35m. So Soyuz is a very cheap and reliable alternative to the Space Shuttle so purely on ecenomic grounds it makes sense for NASA mto retire the fleet and divert the funding in other directions.
Assa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 09:52
Assa2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
That's the type of vehicle that could be converted to take crews after thorough testing which will take some time. That means that the USA will be completely dependent upon Russia's Soyuz to get their astronauts into orbit for the next few years - how embarassing for them!

With hindsight, the USA might have better to go down the road of keeping the Saturn 1 assembly line going and putting Apollo capsules or lifting bodies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_body on top of them to carry astronauts into space and back again. That way they'd still have a viable launch capability today.

As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk
Interesting point about the Saturn 1 system.

That is a fundemental flaw in the way NASA has developed / procured systems over it's history. There has been very little if any natural evolution of the designs. Each time they've moved on to a new programme they've effectivley asked for and bought a completely different design for the launch system. Each one has lasted less than a decade with the exception of the Shuttle, but even thene there's hardly ever been a major redesign with the exception of the SRBs after Challenger.

Contrast that with Soyuz which itself was a development of older Russian systems. It's been around in one form or another for 45 years but has kept on being updated and improved so that today as a manned launch system it is cheap, reliable and effective.
Assa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 13:50
tiger2000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158

TV Alert

Space Night on BBC FOUR today from 7pm. Look like a couple of interesting programmes I'll save to my HD.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/program...1/4/10#evening
tiger2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 17:35
emails
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: northwest
Posts: 9,566
TV Alert

Space Night on BBC FOUR today from 7pm. Look like a couple of interesting programmes I'll save to my HD.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/program...1/4/10#evening
yes only 2 programmes i can see might be worth watching
emails is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47.