|
||||||||
Space and Astronomy Thread |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1626 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,567
|
Quote:
That's quite neat )
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1627 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales
Posts: 607
|
This looks like a great way to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the first man in space: http://www.firstorbit.org/
It is a film using modern footage from the ISS to 'recreate' what Gagarin would have seen on his flight as the first man in space. Nice idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1628 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,104
|
Quote:
I think it`s great !!
Too cloud here grrrr and the night before was so clear ![]() ![]() Quote:
I discivered this little tool last night. I have not come across anything quite like it before. See http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/s....php?t=1451015
http://photoephemeris.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#1629 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
|
The Herschel Space Telescope...
...was featured on a BBC radio documentary earlier on in the week and the relevant links are here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00nycw3 http://herschel.cf.ac.uk/results/whirlpool-galaxy The Hershel telescope is dedicated to infrared astronomy and its mirror is 3.5 metres in diameter and that is 1.5x the Hubble Space Telescope's mirror. However, the more you go into the infrared, the longer the wavelength is and the poorer the resolution is so scroll down on that first link and looking at the Whirlpool Galaxy in the different infrared wavelengths show this. Even the best infrared picture is still worse than the best optical picture from Hubble here: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...mat/large_web/ http://herschel.cf.ac.uk/files/M51_H...S_3colours.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#1630 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Osaka
Posts: 2,007
|
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1631 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,267
|
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
A really beautiful time lapse from Norway of the aurora stunning work by the cameraman
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1632 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
|
Quote:
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1633 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Osaka
Posts: 2,007
|
Quote:
No. There was the Constellation project which included Orion as the next manned spaceship for NASA but nthat has largely been cancelled and NASA are now looking to private ventures to come up with replacements. In the mean time the US & ESA will use Russia's Soyuz to get to and from the ISS.
on what comes next, In terms of manned space flight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1634 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158
|
From National Geographic... Quote:
NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory has been orbiting Earth since February 2010, watching the sun with a suite of instruments designed to monitor the evolution of solar activity. But twice a year the spacecraft's orbit brings it into an "eclipse" season, when SDO slips behind Earth for up to 72 minutes a day. During these short periods, the craft sees the sun partly in Earth's shadow. But unlike the solar eclipses seen from Earth—which appear crisp due to the airlessness of moon—SDO's eclipses are filtered through Earth's atmosphere. This creates an uneven edge to the shadow cast on the sun, as seen in the picture, captured March 29. http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...59951_huge.jpg http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...14_600x450.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#1635 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,487
|
I love space and cosmology. Dr Brian Cox is my hero
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1636 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ♫ At The Keyboard ♫
Posts: 11,556
|
Quote:
From National Geographic...
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...59951_huge.jpg http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...14_600x450.jpg http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#1637 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158
|
Great news for British astronomy... Jodrell Bank chosen as base for largest radio telescope Quote:
Jodrell Bank Observatory in Cheshire has been selected as the headquarters for a £1.3bn project to build the world's biggest radio telescope. An agreement to run the Square Kilometre Array from Jodrell Bank was signed in Rome by Australia, China, the Netherlands, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. SKA is designed to answer some key questions about the Universe. Its location is undecided but could be built in Australia or Southern Africa.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12947435
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1638 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
|
How much would you weigh on other stellar objects?.
http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weight/ Apparently I'd weigh 1,680,000,000,000 stones on a neutron star, that's about 10,500,000,000 tons!! (For a merest fraction of a second before I got squished into sub atomic particles.) Mind boggling.! literally
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1639 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
|
Quote:
Is there a confirmed replacement for the space shuttle .
The fellow I heard from got a little bit Dan Dare on the subject.. Quote:
No. There was the Constellation project which included Orion as the next manned spaceship for NASA but nthat has largely been cancelled and NASA are now looking to private ventures to come up with replacements. In the mean time the US & ESA will use Russia's Soyuz to get to and from the ISS.
In the medium term, the likely replacements for the shuttle originate from the private sector and what they are basically doing is reinventing the Saturn 1 rocket http://www.google.co.uk/images?um=1&...&aqi=&aql=&oq= which will take astronauts into Earth orbit and to the ISS but they're not powerful enough to go to the Moon. The two private sector contenders are Space X's Dragon capsule http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Dragon to be launched atop the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9 rocket and Orbital Science's Prometheus lifting body http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HL20_mockup.jpeg to be launched atop an Atlas V rocket http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V. At the time of writing, Space X's proposals seem to be closer to practical realisation. Space News Update Earth is a gravity potato... ...and there's more here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12911806. The mass of the Earth is not uniformly spread and that means that parts of the planet contain more mass than other parts. That produces a variation in the Earth's gravitational field and that very variation has now been mapped by the GOCE satellite to produce a rather unusual gravity strength map. The launch of the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA)... ...is covered in this article here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12924060. This new body will be responsible for devising and implementing British space policy and there's more at UKSA's website here http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency. This new agency will have a budget of some £220 million a year and space science recently received a boost in the last budget of £10 million http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12833654. Whilst this is good news, UK funding for space is way behind other states such as France. The best that can be said is that UK space science is at least going in the right direction now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1640 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
|
Quote:
The launch of the United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA)...
...is covered in this article here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12924060. This new body will be responsible for devising and implementing British space policy and there's more at UKSA's website here http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency. This new agency will have a budget of some £220 million a year and space science recently received a boost in the last budget of £10 million http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12833654. Whilst this is good news, UK funding for space is way behind other states such as France. The best that can be said is that UK space science is at least going in the right direction now. I'm not convinced the UKSA is a worthwhile move in the long run unless it gets some sort of regulatory role to 'manage' a burgeoning manned space flight industry in this country much like the CAA does for civil aviation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1641 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
|
Quote:
Slightly ironically other countries, especially the USA, are moving away from centralised funding of space programmes and towards more commerciallise projects. The UK space industry is one of the world leaders so we've had that sort of model for a long time. However it's concentrated where the money is i.e. commercial satellites and Defence applications. There's not much money to be made out of science or manned space flight at the moment. The minute that chages (especially manned space flight) I imagine the private sector in this country will be in the vanguard. I'm sure I've seen some proposals from BAe for SpaceShip2-like sub-orbital craft recently.
I'm not convinced the UKSA is a worthwhile move in the long run unless it gets some sort of regulatory role to 'manage' a burgeoning manned space flight industry in this country much like the CAA does for civil aviation. I suspect, Assa2, that a good part of UKSA's work will involve the funding and coordination of funding for space science work that won't get funded by the private sector, e.g. remote sensing for environmental purposes in Earth orbit, exploration of the Earth's electromagnetic environment, space probes to study the Sun and planets, etc. and that's no bad thing. Such funding should result in high-tech jobs staying in the UK so that the economy benefits too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1642 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
|
Referring back to the discussion a few posts ago about the future of the US's manned space program, SpaceX has announced plans to launch the largest rocket since the Saturn V in 2 years time: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12975872 This heavy-lift rocket could put into LEO Quote:
more than a fully loaded Boeing 737 with 136 passengers, luggage and fuel
Wow!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1643 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Storbritannia
Posts: 28,927
|
Quote:
Referring back to the discussion a few posts ago about the future of the US's manned space program, SpaceX has announced plans to launch the largest rocket since the Saturn V in 2 years time:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12975872 This heavy-lift rocket could put into LEO Wow! ![]() With hindsight, the USA might have better to go down the road of keeping the Saturn 1 assembly line going and putting Apollo capsules or lifting bodies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_body on top of them to carry astronauts into space and back again. That way they'd still have a viable launch capability today. As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk |
|
|
|
|
|
#1644 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,567
|
Nice link here. What does it take to make an astronaut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1645 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DTG Bunker
Posts: 5,044
|
Quote:
As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1646 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,583
|
Quote:
That's the type of vehicle that could be converted to take crews after thorough testing which will take some time. That means that the USA will be completely dependent upon Russia's Soyuz to get their astronauts into orbit for the next few years - how embarassing for them!
![]() You tend to suspect that NASA has suffered at the expense of the US defence budget. That could backfire, especially on the Air Force, as NASA did a lot of research which was then used for military purposes. |
|
|
|
|
#1647 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
|
With the construction of the ISS virtually complete the role of the space shuttle has ended. Given the rate of crew rotation on the ISS you would only need 4 missions or so a year. According to NASA each shuttle launch costs $450m although I'm sure I saw a figure of over $1billion before. Certainly there are other high costs involved in maintaining the fleet when not in flight prep. In other words the shuttle would be a very expensive and infrequent bus service.
NASA bought 15 seats on future Soyuz missions at $48m per seat back in 2007 but that also included several 'Progress' cargo launches for supplies so the actual cost of a Soyuz seat is rather less (Russia make a nice profit). Current rate for a space tourist flight in Soyuz to the ISS is $35m. So Soyuz is a very cheap and reliable alternative to the Space Shuttle so purely on ecenomic grounds it makes sense for NASA mto retire the fleet and divert the funding in other directions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1648 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Solihull
Posts: 7,274
|
Quote:
That's the type of vehicle that could be converted to take crews after thorough testing which will take some time. That means that the USA will be completely dependent upon Russia's Soyuz to get their astronauts into orbit for the next few years - how embarassing for them!
![]() With hindsight, the USA might have better to go down the road of keeping the Saturn 1 assembly line going and putting Apollo capsules or lifting bodies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting_body on top of them to carry astronauts into space and back again. That way they'd still have a viable launch capability today. As an aside, SpaceX's co-founder is one Elon Musk who made his billions from being involved in Paypal! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk That is a fundemental flaw in the way NASA has developed / procured systems over it's history. There has been very little if any natural evolution of the designs. Each time they've moved on to a new programme they've effectivley asked for and bought a completely different design for the launch system. Each one has lasted less than a decade with the exception of the Shuttle, but even thene there's hardly ever been a major redesign with the exception of the SRBs after Challenger. Contrast that with Soyuz which itself was a development of older Russian systems. It's been around in one form or another for 45 years but has kept on being updated and improved so that today as a manned launch system it is cheap, reliable and effective. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1649 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 7,158
|
Space Night on BBC4
TV Alert
Space Night on BBC FOUR today from 7pm. Look like a couple of interesting programmes I'll save to my HD. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/program...1/4/10#evening |
|
|
|
|
|
#1650 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: northwest
Posts: 9,566
|
Quote:
TV Alert
Space Night on BBC FOUR today from 7pm. Look like a couple of interesting programmes I'll save to my HD. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/program...1/4/10#evening |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47.




grrrr and the night before was so clear 


