DS Forums

 
 

Space and Astronomy Thread


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2013, 15:04
atg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4,020
Picture of two comets Panstarrs and Lemmon


They peak in the next two weeks.
Very impressive. I was a bit confused in the description where they said the tails point approximately towards the recently set Sun. However, everything seems in order.

How soon can we see them from the UK?
atg is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 05-03-2013, 15:17
tvqueen1905
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 53,213
Very impressive. I was a bit confused in the description where they said the tails point approximately towards the recently set Sun. However, everything seems in order.

How soon can we see them from the UK?
Next week for panstarrs if i remember correctly
tvqueen1905 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 15:33
HenryGarten
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,567
Very impressive. I was a bit confused in the description where they said the tails point approximately towards the recently set Sun. However, everything seems in order.

How soon can we see them from the UK?
See PannStarrs
HenryGarten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 17:26
atg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 4,020
Thanks, I'll have to find a nice clear horizon for the end of next week.

As for today, there is a well placed -7.8 magnitude Iridium flare at 17.47 and a clear sky here in SE13, which makes a change.
atg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 09:15
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
I see that the BBC have got their graphic wrong in this article about the comet. They are showing a track with the tail towards the Sun instead of away from it.

It is the old misconception that, if it is going in a particular direction, the tail must trail behind.
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 09:40
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
I see that the BBC have got their graphic wrong in this article about the comet. They are showing a track with the tail towards the Sun instead of away from it.

It is the old misconception that, if it is going in a particular direction, the tail must trail behind.
I think they're just trying to keep it easy to understand imo

Technically with the sun setting in the west and the comet following the sun (in it's movement across the sky relative to the observer), it makes sense for the tail to be displayed as roughly going from west to east at that time of the evening, as in the graphic. Your average BBC reader of those articles is unlikely to be that clued up about orbital mechanics and the likes.

Some nice shots here taken by an amateur from a southern hemisphere location.

http://stargazerslounge.com/topic/17...mount-stromlo/
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 09:48
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
Technically with the sun setting in the west and the comet following the sun (in it's movement across the sky), it makes sense for the tail to be displayed as roughly going from west to east at that time of the evening, as in the graphic.
In that graphic, the western horizon is somewhere below the bottom of the image with the Sun somewhere below that, so for the tail to be going west to east, it should be going towards the top of the image, not the bottom as shown.
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 09:54
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
In that graphic, the western horizon is somewhere below the bottom of the image with the Sun somewhere below that, so for the tail to be going west to east, it should be going towards the top of the image, not the bottom as shown.
Well mail them then lol....I know what you're saying, the proof reading is a little lacking. They've probably been confused by the motion of the comet rising through the constellations over the month. At least the they got the rough direction horizontally right (I've seen worse from them!), just not the diagonal orientation of the tail.

Ideally they should've showed a procession of mini comets marking out the days instead of the one blob with a haze behind it.
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 09:58
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
Well mail them then lol...
I already had before I posted here.
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:00
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
I already had before I posted here.
Good man!!

Must admit it's a nasty looking graphic before we even get to the comet!! I find most people with star maps like that get confused quite easily as they don't really show magnitude properly. A lot of the 'quick user guides' etc are a little lacking and don't feature relative scale well enough.

They should've just ripped an image off heavens above and asked for permission etc.
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:03
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
I see that the BBC have got their graphic wrong in this article about the comet. They are showing a track with the tail towards the Sun instead of away from it.

It is the old misconception that, if it is going in a particular direction, the tail must trail behind.
Haven't you added your own misconception to the mix? Comets have two tails, not one.

The ion tail does indeed point away from the sun, but the dust tail points back along the orbital trajectory.
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:05
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
Haven't you added you own misconception to the mix? Comets have two tails, not one.

The ion tail does indeed point away from the sun, but the dust tail points back along the orbital trajectory.
Yes, but the main tail, that most people see, points away.
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:12
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
You might find this interesting relative to our discussion

http://spaceguard.rm.iasf.cnr.it/NSc...t/com-tail.htm
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:17
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
Yes, but the main tail, that most people see, points away.
I can clearly recall seeing both tails of Hale-Bopp, and I also recall that the yellow/white dust tail was the most prominent of the two.

Are you saying this is atypical?
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:21
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
I can clearly recall seeing both tails of Hale-Bopp, and I also recall that the yellow dust tail was the most prominent of the two.

Are you saying this is atypical?
I too clearly remember Hale-Bopp (for weeks on end) and the main impression to the naked eye was of a tail that pointed away from the Sun as expected.
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 10:52
njp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21,645
I too clearly remember Hale-Bopp (for weeks on end) and the main impression to the naked eye was of a tail that pointed away from the Sun as expected.
The images found using google all seem to show a blue ion tail that is rather less prominent than the dust tail (though both are easily seen). So unless this is a mere photographic artefact, and my memory is faulty, I think I'll stick with my recollection!

This paper states that the ion tail didn't become visible until sometime after the dust tail:

"We photographed Comet Hale-Bopp from Sept. 1996, to April 1997, as it approached the Sun, moving from 3.5 AU (1AU = average Sun-Earth distance, or 150 million kilometers) in towards its perihelion at 0.91 AU[3]. During this time, the comet evolved from sporting a short fan-shaped dust cloud,into a twin-tailed object."

However, they also talk about comet Hyakutake having only an ion tail:

"Unlike Comet Hale-Bopp, Comet Hyakutake displayed only a plasma tail (indicating that it was relatively dust-free)"

So clearly not all comets are the same.

Hale-Bopp also had a third tail, consisting of neutral sodium atoms, that took up an intermediate position between the ion and dust tails. I don't think that could be seen without appropriate instrumentation.
njp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 11:07
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
The images found using google all seem to show a blue ion tail that is rather less prominent than the dust tail (though both are easily seen). So unless this is a mere photographic artefact, and my memory is faulty, I think I'll stick with my recollection!

This paper states that the ion tail didn't become visible until sometime after the dust tail:

"We photographed Comet Hale-Bopp from Sept. 1996, to April 1997, as it approached the Sun, moving from 3.5 AU (1AU = average Sun-Earth distance, or 150 million kilometers) in towards its perihelion at 0.91 AU[3]. During this time, the comet evolved from sporting a short fan-shaped dust cloud,into a twin-tailed object."

However, they also talk about comet Hyakutake having only an ion tail:

"Unlike Comet Hale-Bopp, Comet Hyakutake displayed only a plasma tail (indicating that it was relatively dust-free)"

So clearly not all comets are the same.

Hale-Bopp also had a third tail, consisting of neutral sodium atoms, that took up an intermediate position between the ion and dust tails. I don't think that could be seen without appropriate instrumentation.
That is all very interesting, but nothing whatsoever to do with Joe-Public's non-scientific view of things, as was my point about the BBC's graphic (which I see has now been corrected).
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 11:12
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
Guys you'll argue each other into the ground on this....let it go!!
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 11:13
albertd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Crawley, West Sussex
Posts: 9,299
Guys you'll argue each other into the ground on this....let it go!!
Yes, very happy to!
albertd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 11:37
Elissa Richards
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,812
Is anyone going to attempt to image it? Be interesting to see the DS'ers can do!
Elissa Richards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 14:43
fender101
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Reading
Posts: 3,604
I see that the BBC have got their graphic wrong in this article about the comet. They are showing a track with the tail towards the Sun instead of away from it.

It is the old misconception that, if it is going in a particular direction, the tail must trail behind.
"Bright comet 'lighting sky' as it flies by Earth".

Have they seen the weather forecast for the next four days? This comet will have to be ****ing bright.
fender101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2013, 22:23
BeethovensPiano
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ♫ At The Keyboard ♫
Posts: 11,556
Maybe some big news coming from the Curiosity rover next week?

http://spaceref.com/mars/curiousmars...-analysis.html
BeethovensPiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2013, 09:42
Tissy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pembrokeshire.
Posts: 40,686
ProfBrianCox: RT @PeoplesAstro: You can see Comet #panstarrs in west after sunset. Tomorrow night it will sit just below the Moon and above Mars http: ... http://owl.li/2voGrt
Tissy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2013, 19:35
Milian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 452
*jumps up and down*

I saw Pan-STARRS! From my back garden, with the naked eye! Awesome! I thought it'd be visible (with difficulty) from tomorrow! ie, I wasn't even looking for it, so I was stunned to see it so easily, and the double tail it had was beautiful.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...311181802.jpg/

This one's a zoomed-in view.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/4/177pl.jpg/
Milian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2013, 19:45
Pootmatoot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,778
*jumps up and down*

I saw Pan-STARRS! From my back garden, with the naked eye! Awesome! I thought it'd be visible (with difficulty) from tomorrow! ie, I wasn't even looking for it, so I was stunned to see it so easily, and the double tail it had was beautiful.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...311181802.jpg/

This one's a zoomed-in view.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/4/177pl.jpg/


Wow, that's much clearer than I was expecting.
Pootmatoot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40.