Originally Posted by Point17:
“Did u actually like Erika? In season 7 didnt she just ruin it for u???”
I thought she was a good player in season 4 and enjoyed watching her and Jack's relationship. They both did really well considering their alliance was all but sunk in week 3 with David's eviction. Their strategic moves/thinking were usually based on intelligence rather than emotion (i.e. the bitchiness or personal grivences of the other factions that year), which was refreshing to see.
In BB7, it was sad to see that her biggest floor, being fataly attracted to the most dispicable men imaginable, reared it's head again. But again, she still did well. For someone who was essentially on her own at first, she managed to make it all the way to the end. Not only that, but she won the tasks when she needed to and was the only person to instigate a move against Dr Will, and she made it work. (everyone else was too dumb to see the danger he presented/scared to take him on).
Whilst I didn't like some of her behaviour, I think the fans reaction to her was over the top. She was called a whore, etc. yet she went with Boogie because she actually had feelings for him (as hard as that is to understand

). He went with her purely to win the game. The last time I looked, the definition of a whore is someone who sleeps with someone else for financial gain. So surely out of the two, it is Boogie who should have been labelled the whore?
If the Jury was sequestered individually, then she may have done better in the final, but she was never going to win with both Dr Will and Janelle there to influence the vote.
Was she the best player in both the seasons she was in? Nope. But I think she was arguably in the top 3 of both shows, which isn't too shabby.