people are usually entitled to use their own name, providing that there is no attempt to 'pass off' as some other person. didn't sound like that.
anyhow, to the world-class talent that Yoko Ono obviously is, I say "where the fk would you be if you hadn't got it together with John?"
and would you give a shiny shite if you didn't have a financial stake? love is all you need?
so marrying a famous Lennon is OK yet being born one isn't? does Neil Lennon now need your permission to appear on a team sheet? will any great grand-children of John need your say-so to sign their names?
Yoko may have become a Grande Dame by marrying one of the most popular figures of the 1960s, but very few people have any interest in her outside of her as wife of John and her use of the courts to suppress a person who may be talented to protect her income from her late husband is shameful IMO. so much for the idealism of the 1960s.
Funny how love can be - John appeared to love Yoko, even though most of the world apeared to have little or no regard for her and now, rather than be grateful for what he provided, she appears to want to suppress other (talented) people to get what she only got through the irrationality of love. shame on her!
it feels like a flea on a dead dog complaining to me... (remember "I am the Walrus" anybody?)