Originally Posted by delgado:
“Well, yes there's alot of nonsense talked about Klaxons (mainly from the blokes themselves
) but not liking the winner doesn't make the whole award a farce. The voting system is stupid and is done better in other countries like Canada but the idea of the award and the attention it can bring to lesser known artists is good imo.”
“Well, yes there's alot of nonsense talked about Klaxons (mainly from the blokes themselves
) but not liking the winner doesn't make the whole award a farce. The voting system is stupid and is done better in other countries like Canada but the idea of the award and the attention it can bring to lesser known artists is good imo.”
Well it's not about me disliking the winner. I guess they're okay. It was more the reasoning behind the choice of winner that made me feel that the last Mercurys were less than credible.
But like I say it's just personal opinion, and yes, it's a good thing that lesser known artists can be seen.
But by that same token you could say that as Bat For Lashes are at this year's Brits it somehow makes the Brits good.





I assumed he was. Well most of those girl singers are anyway I think Lilly Allen and Joss Stone are the exceptions when it comes to female singers who have been nominated recently.
. I've seen 3 mentioned so far; Amy MacDonald, Electrelane (and M.I.A. from me)
. The Mercury Prize (along with the US, Canadian, Australian and Irish equivalents) are the only music awards I take an interest in because they're not about popularity. Also, you can be sure that M.I.A. will be nominated this year, something The Brits spectacularly failed to do