Originally Posted by Helena Handcart:
“I don't understand why there is all this fuss about Chris when there was no similar outrage over David Seaman who had not only been an excellent ice hockey player but had also won a previous celebrity ice dancing competition.”
Some of us, at least, didn't know that about David Seaman, or weren't following that series of DOI, or weren't using this forum then.
Originally Posted by ava2007:
“I still think people are down playing what he has actually achieved so far, he can spin, dance, lift and actually dance with a partner, and even attempt an axle - all things he couldn't do before the show - he pushes and pushes himself - they have all had a head start over someone else one way or another - DOI have never seen anything like him and are unlikely to in the future - I am hoping for an exciting final.”
Yes, he's learned new things, but one important reason why he's been able to learn figure skating moves such as his spin and his jump is that he could spend time on
that rather than on developing a basic ability to skate well.
The reason he can do much more impressive skating moves than anyone else in the competition is that he's a better skater than anyone else in the competition; and a big part of why he's a better skater than anyone else in the competition is that he
started DOI as a much better skater than anyone else in the competition.
Of course, there are other factors as well. No one's saying talent had no role, or that he's rested on what he could already do. I don't think many are saying he should be disqualified, or anything like that. (I wouldn't even have a problem if he won.)
Now, in shows like this and Strictly Come Dancing, we have to put up with the celebs having various advantages; and the shows would be much less interesting (imo) if everyone had to start from a low level. It's not completely fair, but maybe that's ok. At any rate, viewers accept it.
Also, if there were a rule that said no dance experience, it would rule out too many female celebs and would create bitter controversy over borderline cases, such as when someone had no formal training but still in a sense danced professionally by being a member of a boy-band or similar.
But a line is drawn. In the SCD forum, the current line seems to be that it's ok to have dancing experience, just so long as it's not ballroom dance experience.
Here, people have tried to draw a similar line. It's ok to have skating experience, just so long as it's not ice dance experience. (Probably people would rule out figure skating experience as well, if they thought about it, but it's not always phrased that way.)
But imo skating experience -- of the sort Chris had, to a fairly high level -- is a different sort of advantage (than, say, dance experience is to SCD).
For one thing, there could be a rule that said no skating experience, without changing the show very much, because most of the celebs don't have appreciable skating experience.
For another, it's a huge advantage. Just look how hard most of the celebs found it to be able to jump
at all. The two hockey skaters -- Chris and Greg -- found it
much easier.
Many of the celebs will have started just barely able to stand up on the ice.
No one starts SCD just barely abel to stand up on the dance floor. It's simply not possible to have the same kind of advantage in SCD!