WHY do they argue once they've been told no? Haven't they watched the previous programmes? The judges never change their mind, and the arguing always makes you look desperate.
Originally Posted by Elanor: “WHY do they argue once they've been told no? Haven't they watched the previous programmes? The judges never change their mind, and the arguing always makes you look desperate.”
Maybe they're hoping to be one of those that Andrew sees and put through regardless of the judges...?
Originally Posted by Elanor: “WHY do they argue once they've been told no? Haven't they watched the previous programmes? The judges never change their mind, and the arguing always makes you look desperate.”
It's VERY unprofessional. It's just the same as saying to the judges "you don't know what you are atlking about, but do you still want to hire me?"
Originally Posted by Playboy Nolan: “It's VERY unprofessional. It's just the same as saying to the judges "you don't know what you are atlking about, but do you still want to hire me?"”
Exactly. Can you imagine doing that at a job interview?
Originally Posted by pilgrim4j: “Looking at these little boys, it'd have been agonisingly ugly seeing them voted 'not on' (since we don't actually vote anyone 'off')”
Yes it could have been. That's why it's preferable for ALW and Cameron McKintosh to decide - just like a normal casting.