• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Scott To Win ................ Why ?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
50 Cent
20-07-2003
what has Scott done for the "entertainment value" to win the big brother ???
TOML
20-07-2003
Nout
Jennings
20-07-2003
Or even nowt!
***Angel***
20-07-2003
i heard him speak yesterday that doesn't happen much, maybe its the people with Mute on that are voting him
itsonlyme
20-07-2003
It's not easy being a Doormat.
Khayman
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by ***Angel***
i heard him speak yesterday that doesn't happen much, maybe its the people with Mute on that are voting him ”

I frequently use the mute button, so it can't be that as I don't want him to win

Entertainment wise, hmm.....I can't think of anything. So my answer is nowt as well.
magsiesss
20-07-2003
Why not?
KriZ
20-07-2003
Why MUST (and it is only your option that we MUST) judge the winner based on "entertainment value"!

that may well be your option of how a HM is to be summed up and judged but not everyones!

My opinion on how I arrive at Scott being the best is not one of Entertainment but one of the HM who gave the most to the house.

Now Scott has been there helping as much as possible any and every HM who needed it - He is offten blaimed for Fence Sitting and having no opinion - That is in fact WRONG!

He sees things in a logical manner and on a greater scale than the rest and when looking at the bigger picture, a given HM's tantrum at any given time ain't a lot to get excited about, even if it is "Entertaining".

Scott is a Genuine "Nice bloke" - Maybe you should judge him on how hard it would be inside that house to keep your cool!
All the others have lost it at one stage or another!

So maybe you should vote for the one bloke that has worked his rear end off being there for all in times of need and put in the most work "for the good of the house".

Vote Scott for being Mr Big Brother to everyone and not for someone who got drunk and acted silly !
Sorca
20-07-2003
Scott is the lesser evil of whats left........kinda say's it all about bb4
matt.b
20-07-2003
many fancy him
KriZ
20-07-2003
Now come on!

I just manage to right a sensible post there without meantioning that I fancy him !!!
matt.b
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by KriZ
Now come on!

I just manage to right a sensible post there without meantioning that I fancy him !!!
”

i know good argument though
charleah
20-07-2003
Cos then it means the Sham wont win.

Seriously, if voting for Scott is our best chance to stop the fake fishboy winning, then I'm texting the name Scott til my nails snap off.
bbjason
20-07-2003
why should scott win big brother?

he's not cameron and thats good enough for me

although i would prefer ray to win as he has brought most of of the ones in the house that can win
Georgiecats
20-07-2003
Well what have we gained by having Scott still in the house?

Hmmm a hope of a relationship with Nush.
Looking like Frank Sinatra in the 60s reward room.
Saying very little therefore not making people vote either way.
Never getting nominated well hardly ever.


I think they may find it difficult to put together some best bits because in most of them he's yawning. And hardly speaks. And of course they ARE there for entertainment value because that's why we watch. We don't watch to be bored rigid which we have been alot of the time.

If it's not entertainment what else is it?
gazza71
20-07-2003
I've enjoyed watching Scott when he's been there for Federico and Nush when they've been at their most vulnerable. He's a nice guy, who has made some genuine friendships in the house, and whilst I'm all for keeping the most entertaining people in, I'm also for the nicest person winning. I wouldn't be upset if Ray won, but I'd be pissed off if Steph or Cameron did, so it's either Scott or Ray for me.
TOML
20-07-2003
I would love to have scott has a friend because he is intelligent and covers many topics well. He is not annoying and would be a good flatmate for people who like discussion. But sadly he is not really tv and some of us (myself) prefer loud people on bb for pure entertainment value.
KriZ
20-07-2003
"If it's not entertainment what else is it?"

Intellectual study !

Each to their own - If it is "tittilation" that you are after, then certainly you should vote for the HM that tittilated you.

If it is just a sexual thing then certainly vote for the one you fancy!

I'm voting Scott for the reasons I gave in my main post above.

No Scott hasn't been "Loud" and "in your face" but he does have all the qualities that I stated above. - If that does not rate in your opinion then, well, you won't be voting for him!

As for the tactical Voters then YES! that is the best chance we have of removing Shameron - but as some will waste votes on Ray and Steph (who have no hope of winning) Shameron will slip through!!! - But Scott is in with the best chance of the General Publice Vote + Anti-Shameron voters. Ray is too violent to appeal to the General Public!
micjay
20-07-2003
I agree Scott hasn't given much entertainment value but that could partly be blamed on the people he's stuck with. He's supposed to be reasonably intelligent and I think would have joined in a good discussion but not start one. However debating with Steph is a waste of time and she's very stubborn and just screeches you down, or ends it with 'well, that's your opinion but you're wrong'.

Cameron doesn't debate - the only time he really talks is when its about his life or BBSA and its just one long monologue. Otherwise he stays quiet and won't be drawn.

Ray doesn't seem to have any big opinions on anything and would just end up agreeing because he couldn't find the words to argue.

I would really hate Steph or Cameron to win even though they probably gave us more to talk about than the other two (except for Rays tantrums). In that sense they probably gave us more 'entertainment' (not strictly the right word) value than the others, but rewarding them for being bitchy, self righteous, undermining and generally obnoxious, seems very wrong. They have both made life in the house very uncomfortable for some ex HMs and deliberately kept pointing out to us all their flaws and imperfections whereas none of the others (except for Justine) bitched about the others behind their backs.
thms
20-07-2003
recently bblb reported, more people
bet on big brother than the epsom derby.
on that show, a bookmaker said
scott was the favourite at 5/6.
(basically you put £5 you get back £11)
he also added that if scott won bb4
bookmakers would make a fortune.
however, if cameron went on to win
they would sustain heavy losses.
which means the public wins.
this suggests to me, more people
back cameron to win bb4 than scott.
are people voting out of necessity?

matt.b
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by thms
recently bblb reported, more people
--
back cameron to win bb4 than scott.
are people voting out of necessity?

”

maybe thats it, the missing majority there were reports about a betting scam be4.
Avid_Merrion
20-07-2003
Well, yes I agree with those of you who think Scott should win. But I also see those who think he shouldn't win are also sort of right .....

So in a kind of way everyone is right and noone is wrong and we should all be friends ....

Yes, um, that's my position, but, er, if you disagree I can see your point of view
charleah
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by gazza71
I've enjoyed watching Scott when he's been there for Federico and Nush when they've been at their most vulnerable. He's a nice guy, who has made some genuine friendships in the house, and whilst I'm all for keeping the most entertaining people in, I'm also for the nicest person winning. I wouldn't be upset if Ray won, but I'd be pissed off if Steph or Cameron did, so it's either Scott or Ray for me. ”

Pretty much my view as well. I actually like Ray and Scott as people and they do remind me of some people I know in a lot of ways. Example my husband is evry much a Scott type character, quite, laid back, thoughtful and liked by everyone. His best mate is a real off at the deep end, loud, emotional Ray sort of guy and my hubbie is usually there to clear up the mess.
I'm sure most people have got a mate whos a bit of a Scott.

And if the Sham or the munchkin win, there really is no hope for the GBP.
thms
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by charleah

..........
I'm sure most people have got a mate whos a bit of a Scott.
..........
”



lol

everyone should have a friend like scott

xx
KriZ
20-07-2003
Quote:
“Originally posted by Avid_Merrion
Well, yes I agree with those of you who think Scott should win. But I also see those who think he shouldn't win are also sort of right .....

So in a kind of way everyone is right and noone is wrong and we should all be friends ....

Yes, um, that's my position, but, er, if you disagree I can see your point of view
”

But are you sure???
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map