Quote:
“Originally posted by Khayman
Indeed, isn't life grand when you can see both the good and bad in people, then make up your own mind about what they are like overall? Does the good outweigh the bad, or is it the other way around? It's all down to opinion.
I've settled on "Yeah he has his flaws, but basically he's a good person". You, of course, are free to think otherwise
”
It is grand that we are free to decide and have our own opinions as to what a HMs character is, but can it be fair when the vast majority of those voting are only being shown one side of a certain HMs character, the so called good side, can the vast majority form a reasoned and fairly accurate opinion if they are not shown a fair and balanced coverage of that HMs activities while in the house?
An example of this, would be Federico, who for four week, was given a virtually 100% negative coverage by C4, most IMO as revenge for his Avid Impersonation, yet for those of us who watched E4 extensively, there was more to Fed than just his Slags and slapper comments, very little of his best moments were ever shown on C4, hence the public had a very negative view of Fed as compared to cameron. Yet Fed has never threatened to suffocate, strangle, punch their face or squash anybody's windpipe, in fact he's never advocated any kind of violence to anyone, yet he is not as popular as cameron, where is the logic in that. Of course if C4 had shown a more balanced view of Fed, then that may have been different.