they should increase the length to 10 weeks and make it a rule that no evictions until the end of week 5, then 1 person gets evicted each week up until week 10 where a person is evicted every night.

Good idea but i would just increase to 100 days

i was thinking about this earlier - the BB SA idea of no nominations for the first few weeks is a good idea - altho whether ch4 will agree to no money-grabbing voting is debatable

Perhaps for the first 5 weeks viewers could vote which housemates get goods like double beds, 3 course meal, reward rooms etc, I can see lots of people voting for that.

Oh god no.........Imagen watching these lot for 100 !

No only thing out of many they need to do is get some personalitys please ......

Yeh but there will be better housemates next year hopefully to watch for 100 days.

We could have voting for who could do the live tasks

Of course this would be much better if we knew the task in advance and could vote for the most unsuitable HM

Alison for the assault course
Steph or Jade for a general knowledge quiz
Gos & Ray for the ballet duet

you get the idea.......

Erm silly question........but how do you know?

Next year might be even worse............!

Though i cant imagen anything worse then this one

14 or 16 housemates to enter house this would make it really cramped and would allow for anyone walking. This would also allow for some late surprise evictions and more people would be in later on in the program.

No evictions for at least two/three weeks.

Weekly tasks to be split into teams and the teams would be rotated to split up clique's forming. Each team would be playing for part of the weekly budget plus the winning team/teams would get a bonus amount to spend on themselves only. These items would be kept in lockers and would be for that individual/individuals only. Team tasks could be run one team in the day and one team at night.

Reasons for nominations to be scrapped they would just require to name three people reducing to two halfway through. Any nominations discussions to be dealt with severely First warning removal of voting rights - second warning automatically up for eviction - third warning automatic eviction (you would only have to evict one and they soon stop talking about noms).

Positive voting only.

C4 highlights to fairly reflect housemates good or bad.

How about showing nominations on the video screens, with audio.

It would mean excuses would have to be valid also. And to being two faced either. If you don't like someone, fair enough, don't put on a false face.