It's certainly one of my favourites. It's in a genre all of its own though I think. The closest thing to it is probably "From Ladette to Lady" which I also like but nowhere near as much.
I think I'd go so far as to say "one of a kind".
I love SCD and DOI with a passion too, but The Apprentice probably pips it. However, it is different as they others are fundamentally entertainment-based shows and the Apprentice is supposed to be a bit more than that.
I am so off big brother after last year's utter rubbish that I will never watch it again and I do think I mean that. I have better things to do with my time.
So yes, the Apprentice has it, just. Mind you, I am now getting confused over the difference between "reality TV" and game shows. Most game shows take a selection of members of the public (or so we are told) and set them a series of tasks in order to win a prize (the tasks of course are usually questions, but sometimes like in the excellent old Krypton Factor or the Crystal Maze) there were physical tasks to do or other challenges. So what makes "reality TV" that as such?
I genuinely would like to know because I think the definition is very loose indeed.
I've just read one or two of the posts just before this one now, and I hasten to add that I am massively intelligent (I kid you not!

) but that's not the reason that I am not going to watch Big Brother again. I have watched 4 series of Big Brother and for the most part I found it quite facinating. I just haven't enjoyed the last two series very much because I have felt it was all far too contrived and there was too much outisde interference for it to be a genuine study and it because just a freak show geared to stimilation of a public with jaundiced tastes. Nikki was bad enough, but Chalie Uchea just sealed it for me. However just because other people like it does not make them any less intelligent than me any more than I am any less intelligent than my cat just because I wathed it last year and my cat wasn't interested.