Originally Posted by nowsthebturn:
“I think you have to understand something about the BB jury. From past seasons, the alliances dont carry over to the jury. Once they are out of the house, and relaxing in the jury, they dont need anymore alliances. That was just during the game. And most times, the jury rewards the most deserving player. They are a lot more impartial than you think! Sharon I dont think is gonna get a lot votes. A guy like James for example, will never vote for her. He's been busting his butt trying t stay in that house. fighting for vetos and votes, while sharon just sits back and do nothing, as a pawn, until all targets are evicted. He would never vote for sharon, and neither would chelsea I dont think. If anyone would vote for her, it would be Natalie (I think she'll be mad at being blindsided), and maybe Josh because they were partners!”
I really can't see good sense coming into it this year, the only other time we have had a similar situation - when there's such a strong split in the house and the alliances have stayed true to each other for several weeks, was BB6 - and when it got down to the jury those loyalties stayed true.
James does not strike me as the sort of person who would put his bitterness aside and vote based on who played the better game - but I guess that comes down to how I see him, a lot liked the dude but I found him to be hypocritical, unpleasant, immature, a whinger etc, Chelsia and Josh? Not a chance in hell they'd vote for any one over Sharon imho.
I'd like to be proved wrong, and wouldn't be
that surprised if I am, but no...I am pretty convinced Sharon has those 3 votes locked in.