|
||||||||
Dr Who Ratings Thread (Merged) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#251 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: A Crack In Time
Posts: 13,646
|
Quote:
Got a yearning for the naughty step this afternoon, eh, BG?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,652
|
Quote:
7.7m (36.1%)
Let's hope the rest of the series can keep its momentum! Regards, Cypher |
|
|
|
|
|
#253 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
|
An excellent figure this week! Wonder if an extra million non-Who but Christie fans joined us?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#254 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,639
|
Brillaint figure. 36.1% audience share too, which is brilliant. 2nd most watched programme of the day. Top programme for the BBC on Saturdays.
I'm so glad next week it's not on in relation to the audience figures as it will be earlier and not get as much viewers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,405
|
I read a story (possibly here on Digital Spy) that the BBC wasn't going to do another 'I'd Do Anything' next year.
It may be they've run out of West End shows to cast the lead for, but I got the impression they've realised that even by giving it Doctor Who's time slot, they still can't get the viewers. Doesn't make much of a difference, taking into account there's no season 5 next year anyway, but nice to know they may have learnt a lesson about scheduling (you can lead a horse to water etc etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
#256 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: A Crack In Time
Posts: 13,646
|
Quote:
I read a story (possibly here on Digital Spy) that the BBC wasn't going to do another 'I'd Do Anything' next year.
It may be they've run out of West End shows to cast the lead for, but I got the impression they've realised that even by giving it Doctor Who's time slot, they still can't get the viewers. Doesn't make much of a difference, taking into account there's no season 5 next year anyway, but nice to know they may have learnt a lesson about scheduling (you can lead a horse to water etc etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,405
|
Quote:
wouldn't you like to see it return to it's natural home in the Autumn/Winter schedule?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: A Crack In Time
Posts: 13,646
|
Quote:
Ooohh, imagine that. All dark and cold outside, rain tapping on the lounge windows and wind howling down the chimney . . . and Doctor Who on the telly! Lovely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#259 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,639
|
Quote:
Ooohh, imagine that. All dark and cold outside, rain tapping on the lounge windows and wind howling down the chimney . . . and Doctor Who on the telly! Lovely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#260 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I wear a Stetson now...
Posts: 92,640
|
Quote:
Ooohh, imagine that. All dark and cold outside, rain tapping on the lounge windows and wind howling down the chimney . . . and Doctor Who on the telly! Lovely.
Quote:
yes please
![]() Quote:
That would be good, especially for the scary (Moffat) episodes. I wasn't really creeped out by Blink last year as the sun was shining through the windows. It wasn't till I watched it again at night that it scared me.
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/a96...-timeslot.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#261 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 1,921
|
Quote:
Ooohh, imagine that. All dark and cold outside, rain tapping on the lounge windows and wind howling down the chimney . . . and Doctor Who on the telly! Lovely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#262 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,405
|
Quote:
sounds like last summer....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 523
|
Quote:
wouldn't you like to see it return to it's natural home in the Autumn/Winter schedule?
61 out of 134 First Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 39 out of 129 Second Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 66 out of 128 Third Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 26 out of 170 Fourth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 4 out of 69 Fifth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 9 out of 31 Sixth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 5 out of 42 Seventh Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. So 210 out of 703 episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. Bearing in mind that all of the Davison, Colin Baker and McCoy seasons were shown over thirteen or fourteen weeks, and so stayed largely within a single season, makes an association with Autumn/Winter more a consequence of scheduling decisions than any perception that Doctor Who is an Autumn/Winter series. If Davison's episodes had been had not been shown twice weekly, and Colin Baker's episodes been a standard 26 x 25 minutes (with no hiatus), then more than half of all Doctor Who episodes would have been shown in Spring or Summer, rather than well over a quarter as actually happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#264 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
Something of a myth that. A large amount of classic Who was broadcast in Spring and Summer.
61 out of 134 First Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 39 out of 129 Second Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 66 out of 128 Third Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 26 out of 170 Fourth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 4 out of 69 Fifth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 9 out of 31 Sixth Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. 5 out of 42 Seventh Doctor episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. So 210 out of 703 episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. Bearing in mind that all of the Davison, Colin Baker and McCoy seasons were shown over thirteen or fourteen weeks, and so stayed largely within a single season, makes an association with Autumn/Winter more a consequence of scheduling decisions than any perception that Doctor Who is an Autumn/Winter series. If Davison's episodes had been had not been shown twice weekly, and Colin Baker's episodes been a standard 26 x 25 minutes (with no hiatus), then more than half of all Doctor Who episodes would have been shown in Spring or Summer, rather than well over a quarter as actually happened. http://slug-web.co.uk/doctorwho/clas...ts_bymonth.asp |
|
|
|
|
|
#265 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,405
|
Quote:
Something of a myth that. A large amount of classic Who was broadcast in Spring and Summer.
If it was broadcast in the spring and summer, this was because each season was so long - 24 episodes or so! Goodness, that's half a year!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#266 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Folkestone
Posts: 10,537
|
Quote:
So 210 out of 703 episodes were shown in Spring or Summer. Bearing in mind that all of the Davison, Colin Baker and McCoy seasons were shown over thirteen or fourteen weeks, and so stayed largely within a single season, makes an association with Autumn/Winter more a consequence of scheduling decisions than any perception that Doctor Who is an Autumn/Winter series.
Which means that 70% of all episodes were shown in Autumn/Winter, so the perception that Doctor Who is a Autumn/Winter show is down to the fact that 7 out of every 10 episodes were in Autumn/Winter. Quote:
Something of a myth that. A large amount of classic Who was broadcast in Spring and Summer.
70% is greater than 30%, 70% wins, Autumn/Winter wins, FACT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#267 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
|
I'd heard that the Beeb weren't doing another musical search next year, but also heard that Lloyd-Webfoot wants to do "The Wizard of Oz" next, so conflicting stories out there.
As much fun as it would be watching DW on a dark cold evening, the Beeb is never gonna put DW head-to-head with something like "The X Factor", which forms quite a part of ITV's autumn/winter schedule. I guess there could be room for both, after all "Britain's Got Talent" is on at the moment, but it doesn't have two parts to the show like "The X Factor". |
|
|
|
|
|
#268 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 824
|
Quote:
I'd heard that the Beeb weren't doing another musical search next year, but also heard that Lloyd-Webfoot wants to do "The Wizard of Oz" next, so conflicting stories out there.
As much fun as it would be watching DW on a dark cold evening, the Beeb is never gonna put DW head-to-head with something like "The X Factor", which forms quite a part of ITV's autumn/winter schedule. I guess there could be room for both, after all "Britain's Got Talent" is on at the moment, but it doesn't have two parts to the show like "The X Factor". Do we think the ratings for TU&TW were purely down to the change in timeslot or the weather wasn't as nice and it was about Agatha Christie? |
|
|
|
|
|
#269 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,692
|
Quote:
Do we think the ratings for TU&TW were purely down to the change in timeslot or the weather wasn't as nice and it was about Agatha Christie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#270 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
I'd heard that the Beeb weren't doing another musical search next year, but also heard that Lloyd-Webfoot wants to do "The Wizard of Oz" next, so conflicting stories out there.
As much fun as it would be watching DW on a dark cold evening, the Beeb is never gonna put DW head-to-head with something like "The X Factor", which forms quite a part of ITV's autumn/winter schedule. I guess there could be room for both, after all "Britain's Got Talent" is on at the moment, but it doesn't have two parts to the show like "The X Factor". X-Factor finishes just before Christmas for some strange reason I've never been able to fathom and in my opinion it would be perfect to start a new Doctor Who series with a Christmas Special, and then continue it through to the Spring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#271 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,134
|
Quote:
I've said it before. The figures I've linked to above show that historically the most successful months for Doctor Who were January to March.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#272 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 4,094
|
Quote:
And how many decades out of date are those figures?
But people still watch more TV in the Autumn/Winter months now: http://www.barb.co.uk/viewingsummary...viewingsummary |
|
|
|
|
|
#273 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 523
|
Quote:
But it's interesting that the average audience peaked in the January - March period.
http://slug-web.co.uk/doctorwho/clas...ts_bymonth.asp Quote:
I think this is probably quite true, but my memory is that each season started in the autumn (September time).
If it was broadcast in the spring and summer, this was because each season was so long - 24 episodes or so! Goodness, that's half a year!!! All of the Pertwee seasons started late December/January. The first Tom Baker season started late December. All the rest were late August/early September. All of Davison's seasons started in early January, as did Colin Baker's first. The hiatus shifted Baker's second series to Autumn, all of McCoys staying the same. So the series shifted about a lot more than people think. Quote:
Sorry to bring statistics into this (well basic algebra anyway) but if 210 episodes were shown in Spring/Summer then 493 were shown in Autumn/Winter.
Which means that 70% of all episodes were shown in Autumn/Winter, so the perception that Doctor Who is a Autumn/Winter show is down to the fact that 7 out of every 10 episodes were in Autumn/Winter. My point is - the BBC didn't treat the series as an Autumn/Winter show, and the changes to broadcast patterns had more to do with finding a 26 part series awkward to fit in than anything else. A fan common fan perception is that Doctor Who was all watched in the early evening darkness of Autumn and Winter, when a substantial part of it was shown in the brightness of Spring and Summer. In fact - being in a much earlier timeslot back then, for much of its life, meant that a fair few Autumn and Winter screenings were actually watched with the sun streaming through the windows. |
|
|
|
|
|
#274 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,294
|
I would think if they are going to shift Doctor Who, it would probably be more likely to move to a January-March run, rather than a September-December one. The schedules on BBC and ITV are packed in the autumn with Strictly and X-Factor in such a way that trying to schedule Doctor Who without clashing would be a nightmare.
Much better to move to Saturday nights January-March, which has been now been vacated by Dancing on Ice. Doctor Who would have a free run, in the dark, off the back of a much-hyped Christmas special. This would surely be the best option. |
|
|
|
|
|
#275 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37,497
|
Quote:
Excellent stuff! That's not a million miles away from where S4 started. Doubly-impressive when you consider that it's a mid-series ep.
Let's hope the rest of the series can keep its momentum! Regards, Cypher |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07.




