• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Dr Who Ratings Thread (Merged)
<<
<
112 of 288
>>
>
Mulett
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by GDK:
“Not really. They will have calculated that the audience for BGT and TV is largely the same people, whereas Doctor Who viewers are largely not the same people as BGT and TV. BGT and TV are similar types of programme which attract similar viewers. They want to avoid splitting the viewing figures, fearing that TV would loose out.”

Yes, that's probably right. Interesting, though, that they normally don't bother giving viewers such a choice.

Strictly regularly goes head-to-head with X-Factor which have largely the same audiences, And I'm sure all those dreadful Andrew Lloyd Webber talent search shows (like 'I'd Do Anything') went head-to-head with BGT.

It just feels to me like The Voice is getting special treatment at the expense of Doctor Who.
morph1970
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“Final ratings for Cold War were 7.37 million, with a timeshift of 1.64 million. While the timeshift is indeed a little down than of late, it did better than was being predicted in this thread a few days ago.....”

I explained why that was going to happen a few days ago. The figures we were seeing were including three minutes of weather. That has now been corrected with the official figures.
nebogipfel
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Dr Thete:
“They only get published occasionally, but here are some from Series Seven so far (BBC One final figures in brackets):

9.65m (8.33m) - Asylum of the Daleks
8.64m (7.57m) - Dinosaurs on a Spaceship
9.22m (8.42m) - A Town Called Mercy
8.68m (7.67m) - The Power of Three
8.92m (7.82m) - The Angels Take Manhattan”

Thanks Dr Thete! The regular figures are healthy enough. But the Live+7 (a really good measure of how many people watched within a week) shows astoundingly strong performance.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by morph1970:
“I explained why that was going to happen a few days ago. The figures we were seeing were including three minutes of weather. That has now been corrected with the official figures.”

Yep. It's lovely (and often times reassuring) that Yog101 gives up updates on the timeshifts, but the issue you mention does need to be taken in to account. The data above shows, for example shows a big dip in the final final five minutes, that of course will be due to people turning over as the credits role...
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Lowest rating ep of the series so far in the overnights by 500k, and with the timeshift for 7B so far decreasing with each ep, probably the lowest officially too. Shame, I really liked last night's episode. Rings deserved that honour, awful.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“Lowest rating ep of the series so far in the overnights by 500k, and with the timeshift for 7B so far decreasing with each ep, probably the lowest officially too. Shame, I really liked last night's episode. Rings deserved that honour, awful.”

Some of the most loved episodes of Doctor Who with fandom have ended up being among the least viewed - The Impossible Planet (6.32m), The Satan Pit (6.08m), Silence in the Library (6.27m), Blink (6.62m) etc.

It's ironic really, but I guess you can't know in advance how good a story will be!
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“Some of the most loved episodes of Doctor Who with fandom have ended up being among the least viewed - The Impossible Planet (6.32m), The Satan Pit (6.08m), Silence in the Library (6.27m), Blink (6.62m) etc.

It's ironic really, but I guess you can't know in advance how good a story will be!”

I never got the hype around the last two of them (Not a fan of Moffat's episodes in general, loved his series 1 two parter and liked the series 5 finale and series 6 opener but that's about it, none of my favourite episodes of Moffat's era are his), but loved TIP and TSP.
Sceptilian
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“I never got the hype around the last two of them (Not a fan of Moffat's episodes in general, loved his series 1 two parter and liked the series 5 finale and series 6 opener but that's about it, none of my favourite episodes of Moffat's era are his), but loved loved TIP and TSP.”

Too complicated for you?
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“I never got the hype around the last two of them”

No me neither really, but they are very popular with fandom as whole. The only story of Moffats I really loved before him being show runner was The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances.

The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit is one of the few series 2 stories I actually enjoyed.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Sceptilian:
“Too complicated for you?”

yes they were far too complicated for both myself and Digital Sid. The fact that I have subsequently enjoyed most of Moffat's stories since he took over is because I had a brain transplant operation rather than it being a question of personal preference.
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Sceptilian:
“Too complicated for you?”

They're not remotely complicated. Complicated for Who yes, but it's a teatime family show, not Inception.
Banks246
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“No me neither really, but they are very popular with fandom as whole. The only story of Moffats I really loved before him being show runner was The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances.

The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit is one of the few series 2 stories I actually enjoyed.”

Still my favourite 2 parter in Doctor who!
Sceptilian
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“They're not remotely complicated. Complicated for Who yes, but it's a teatime family show, not Inception.”

Inception is hardly complicated - in fact it's nolans least compelling film, and notably less accomplished than blink. Memento or the prestige maybe.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Banks246:
“Still my favourite 2 parter in Doctor who!”

Yep mine too

The Doctor Dances rated under 7 million as well (6.86m)
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“No me neither really, but they are very popular with fandom as whole. The only story of Moffats I really loved before him being show runner was The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances.”

Same. Blink is a decent episode but it's not remotely deserving of all the fawning and recognition it gets, even Moffat himself didn't rate it and he rates his work more highly than his fans do.
Quote:
“The Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit is one of the few series 2 stories I actually enjoyed.”

Series 2 was my second least favourite series after series 6.
nebogipfel
21-04-2013
So....steering the thread back to ratings then....ratings are as strong as ever? Sort of? Eight years in and still hauling in the mainstream week after week
Banks246
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“Yep mine too

The Doctor Dances rated under 7 million as well (6.86m) ”

I think sometimes we an all get a bit too carried away with ratings and stuff.

Every show has dips and highs in rating for a number of reasons.

But 5 million overnights is still a good figure, not t mention I-player, people who were out enjoying the sun, BGT etc etc.

The finale and 50th Anniversary will draw loads in.

I reckon they will revert back to a full season rather tha splitting it in half next season as well, I think I remember them saying they wanted to do it like this because they didn't wanted it to build towards the 50th.
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by nebogipfel:
“So....steering the thread back to ratings then....ratings are as strong as ever? Sort of? Eight years in and still hauling in the mainstream week after week”

Though satisfaction doesn't seem to be quite as high, perhaps it would have been the same during the RTD era, but every other tweet last night was moaning about how little they liked this series, how they preferred David to Matt, how they were only watching for Matt now or how it was the first episode they'd liked in ages.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by nebogipfel:
“So....steering the thread back to ratings then....ratings are as strong as ever? Sort of? Eight years in and still hauling in the mainstream week after week”

Basically, yeah, lol!

There are some fluctuations up or down for various reasons, but the show overall is still overall continues to average between 7.5-8 million viewers.
The Gatherer
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Abomination:
“Putting a show like Doctor Who up against BGT says a lot more about Doctor Who than a lot of people seem to think. If they're happy to put it up against the likes of BGT then they are clearly still displaying a confidence in the brand. It's when they start trying to avoid Doctor Who clashing with BGT that we should be worried. ”

So by this logic it was good when Doctor Who was scheduled against Coronation Street in 1987 was it? Let's face it, the BBC are only interested in protecting The Voice.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Digital Sid:
“Though fan satisfaction doesn't seem to be quite as high, perhaps it would have been the same during the RTD era, but every other tweet last night was moaning about how little they liked this series, how they preferred David to Matt, how they were only watching for Matt now or how it was the first episode they'd liked in ages.”

Hard to compare with the RTD era, though, as twitter was hardly as prevalent back when he ran the show. And I can well remember the unpleasantness that was directed at him by fans here and on OG when he ran the show. So honestly? I don't think it's that different, it's just that it's different people complaining and they now have a more recent point of comparison to make than critics of the RTD era did.
Muttley76
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by The Gatherer:
“So by this logic it was good when Doctor Who was scheduled against Coronation Street in 1987 was it? .”

I think it was a different scenario though, the shows strength now lies in the fact that it has an audience that uses multi platform options to view it. Back then, people either watched or didn't, and when it was up against Corrie they just didn't watch it.

Plus back then the show was not valued by the BBC the way it is now and a lot of people actively wanted rid of it.
Banks246
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“Hard to compare with the RTD era, though, as twitter was hardly as prevalent back when he ran the show. And I can well remember the unpleasantness that was directed at him by fans here and on OG when he ran the show. So honestly? I don't think it's that different, it's just that it's different people complaining and they now have a more recent point of comparison to make than critics of the RTD era did.”

You raise some very good points there.

I'm sure when a new writer takes over for Moffat we will hear people say how they preferred Moffat.
Digital Sid
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“Hard to compare with the RTD era, though, as twitter was hardly as prevalent back when he ran the show.”

Hence "perhaps it would have been the same during the RTD era".
Quote:
“And I can well remember the unpleasantness that was directed at him by fans here and on OG when he ran the show. So honestly? I don't think it's that different, it's just that it's different people complaining and they now have a more recent point of comparison to make than critics of the RTD era did.”

I meant regularly watching viewer rather than forum using hardcore fan but yeah, the proper fans are no more pleased now than they were then, OG hated his guts, now GB hate Moffat's. I lean towards RTD, I prefer Matt to David and I think the production values have improved considerably but lying to us, cheating us out of episodes and treating UK viewers like the red headed step child in an attempt to attract more US viewers irk me more than DT's tendency to Teeth Grit his way through episodes.
The Gatherer
21-04-2013
Originally Posted by Muttley76:
“I think it was a different scenario though, the shows strength now lies in the fact that it has an audience that uses multi platform options to view it. Back then, people either watched or didn't, and when it was up against Corrie they just didn't watch it.

Plus back then the show was not valued by the BBC the way it is now and a lot of people actively wanted rid of it.”

Yes, that's true.
<<
<
112 of 288
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map